IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v12y2016i1p274-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Innovation on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Soyoung Park
  • Yinglee Tseng
  • Sungchan Kim

Abstract

Organizational innovation has been commonly considered as the strategic means for performance improvement in an organization. However, there is little research regarding how innovative practices influence individual work satisfaction in public organizations. Thus, this paper aims to examine how innovative practices will affect public employees¡¯ job satisfaction using the results of the 2013 U.S. Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS). The findings indicate that organizational practice toward innovation has a positive impact on job satisfaction. On the other hand, supervisors, underrepresented groups such as females and ethnic minorities, and older employees perceive that innovation has a negative impact on job satisfaction. However, employees with a higher level of work experience and payment grade believe that innovation leads to more job satisfaction. Moreover, employees in regulatory agencies perceive that innovation is negatively related to job satisfaction, while employees in distributive agencies perceive that innovation is positively related to job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Soyoung Park & Yinglee Tseng & Sungchan Kim, 2016. "The Impact of Innovation on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 274-286, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:1:p:274-286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/52888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/52888
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imran Khan & Tauqir Ahmad Ghauri & Kashif Akram, 2012. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and HR Practices, an Empirical Research of Different Sectors of University Teachers in Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(3), pages 25-33, June.
    2. Hans Loof & Almas Heshmati, 2006. "On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4-5), pages 317-344.
    3. Bryson, Alex & Dale-Olsen, Harald & Barth, Erling, 2009. "How does innovation affect worker well-being?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27781, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. David Albury, 2005. "Fostering Innovation in Public Services," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 51-56, January.
    5. Mark Moore & Jean Hartley, 2008. "Innovations in governance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 3-20, January.
    6. Kaiser, Lutz C., 2014. "Job Satisfaction and Public Service Motivation," IZA Discussion Papers 7935, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Jean Hartley, 2005. "Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 27-34, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mustafa Aslan & Hulya Atesoglu, 2021. "The Effect of Innovation and Participation as Workplace Values on Job Satisfaction and the Mediating Effect of Psychological Ownership," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bugge, Markus M. & Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje, 2019. "Governance for system optimization and system change: The case of urban waste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1076-1090.
    2. Gomez, Rebecca J. & Travis, Dnika J. & Ayers-Lopez, Susan & Schwab, A. James, 2010. "In search of innovation: A national qualitative analysis of child welfare recruitment and retention efforts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 664-671, May.
    3. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    4. Clark, Richard & Griffith, Garry & Madzivhandila, Tshilidzi & Mulholland, Cynthia & Nengovhela, Nkhanedzeni & Timms, Janice, 2012. "Learning by Writing: Applying Continuous Improvement and Innovation Principles to Project Management by Formal Documentation and Publication," Papers 234293, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    5. Klas Palm & Johan Lilja, 2021. "On the road to Agenda 2030 together in a complex alliance of Swedish public authorities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9564-9580, June.
    6. Rinor KURTESH, 2018. "A Systematic Review Of The Internal And External Barriers To Public Sector Innovation In Kosovo," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(3), pages 12-23, September.
    7. Nilssen, Maja, 2019. "To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 98-104.
    8. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Marta Orviska & Juraj Nemec, 2015. "Public Sector Innovation Support by European States: Its Characteristics and Impact on Firms," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 19-31.
    10. Bruce C. Glavovic, 2013. "Coastal Innovation Paradox," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & Arundel, Anthony, 2017. "Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 900-910.
    12. Ani MATEI & Corina-Georgiana ANTONOVICI & Carmen SAVULESCU, 2015. "Innovative Public Marketing As Instrument For Creating The Social Value," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 21-34, September.
    13. Aaron M. Lane, 2020. "The destruction phase of public sector innovation: regulations governing school closure in Australia," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1151-1169, September.
    14. Lena Brogaard, 2021. "Innovative outcomes in public-private innovation partnerships: a systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 135-157, January.
    15. Kurteshi Rinor, 2018. "Human Resources Supporting Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Kosovo," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 9(3), pages 153-172, December.
    16. Laurin Buchheim & Alexander Krieger & Sarah Arndt, 2020. "Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 509-533, November.
    17. Szkuta, Katarzyna & Pizzicannella, Roberto & Osimo, David, 2014. "Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: A scoping study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 558-567.
    18. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.
    19. Teimuraz Gogokhia & George Berulava, 2021. "Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 221-245, June.
    20. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2014. "Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2014-04, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:1:p:274-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.