IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p989-d100859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit

Author

Listed:
  • Gerardo Maria Mauro

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Costantino Menna

    (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Umberto Vitiello

    (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Domenico Asprone

    (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Ascione

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Nicola Bianco

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Andrea Prota

    (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Peter Vanoli

    (Department of Medicine, Università degli studi del Molise, Via Cesare Gazzani 47, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

Abstract

Most European buildings built before 1980s were constructed without any design concern for energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. In addition to this issue, over the last decades, the essential need of safer buildings has progressively attracted the interest of scientific community and government institutions. However, the strong interaction between energy and structural aspects in building retrofit design has never been handled via robust and reliable approaches. The present study explores this knowledge gap by introducing a novel multi-step approach that addresses the retrofit of existing buildings by integrating energy, structural and economic aspects. To this end, a multi-stage energy optimization is carried out by implementing a genetic algorithm and a smart research strategy. Thus, the cost-optimal energy retrofit solution is identified and the impact of the expected economic losses due to seismic damage is assessed throughout the building lifecycle. The methodology is applied to a multi-story residential building, considering the effects of two different building locations, namely Milan and Norcia. These latter are characterized by similar climatic conditions but by a different level of seismic risk, which is higher for Norcia. The outcomes show that the estimated seismic economic losses associated with the energy retrofit solutions are strongly affected by the building location. Thus, the selection of the optimal energy retrofit measures should be related to the building structural behavior in order to achieve reliable economic and sustainability benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerardo Maria Mauro & Costantino Menna & Umberto Vitiello & Domenico Asprone & Fabrizio Ascione & Nicola Bianco & Andrea Prota & Giuseppe Peter Vanoli, 2017. "A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:989-:d:100859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    2. Fabrizio Ascione & Nicola Bianco & Rosa Francesca De Masi & Gerardo Maria Mauro & Giuseppe Peter Vanoli, 2015. "Design of the Building Envelope: A Novel Multi-Objective Approach for the Optimization of Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghazanfar Ali Anwar & Mudasir Hussain & Muhammad Zeshan Akber & Mustesin Ali Khan & Aatif Ali Khan, 2023. "Sustainability-Oriented Optimization and Decision Making of Community Buildings under Seismic Hazard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Martina Caruso & Rui Pinho & Federica Bianchi & Francesco Cavalieri & Maria Teresa Lemmo, 2020. "A Life Cycle Framework for the Identification of Optimal Building Renovation Strategies Considering Economic and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Mohamed Hamdy & Gerardo Maria Mauro, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Building Energy Design to Reconcile Collective and Private Perspectives: CO 2 -eq vs. Discounted Payback Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Marina Fumo & Antonio Formisano & Giulia Sibilio & Antonella Violano, 2018. "Energy and Seismic Recovering of Ancient Hamlets: the Case of Baia e Latina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizio Ascione & Nicola Bianco & Claudio De Stasio & Gerardo Maria Mauro & Giuseppe Peter Vanoli, 2017. "Addressing Large-Scale Energy Retrofit of a Building Stock via Representative Building Samples: Public and Private Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Germán Campos Gordillo & Germán Ramos Ruiz & Yves Stauffer & Stephan Dasen & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2020. "EplusLauncher: An API to Perform Complex EnergyPlus Simulations in MATLAB ® and C#," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2019. "A new comprehensive framework for the multi-objective optimization of building energy design: Harlequin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 331-361.
    4. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    5. Anja Hansen & Jörn Budde & Annette Prochnow, 2016. "Resource Usage Strategies and Trade-Offs between Cropland Demand, Fossil Fuel Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Building Insulation as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-24, June.
    6. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    7. Mohamed Hamdy & Gerardo Maria Mauro, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Building Energy Design to Reconcile Collective and Private Perspectives: CO 2 -eq vs. Discounted Payback Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Harkouss, Fatima & Fardoun, Farouk & Biwole, Pascal Henry, 2018. "Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 591-613.
    9. Prada, A. & Gasparella, A. & Baggio, P., 2018. "On the performance of meta-models in building design optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 814-826.
    10. Amasyali, Kadir & El-Gohary, Nora M., 2021. "Real data-driven occupant-behavior optimization for reduced energy consumption and improved comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    11. Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2022. "An Analysis of the Development of Modular Building Design Elements to Improve Thermal Performance of a Representative High Rise Residential Estate in the Coastline City of Famagusta, Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-50, March.
    12. Delgarm, N. & Sajadi, B. & Kowsary, F. & Delgarm, S., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 293-303.
    13. Iturriaga, E. & Aldasoro, U. & Campos-Celador, A. & Sala, J.M., 2017. "A general model for the optimization of energy supply systems of buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 954-966.
    14. Roberto Robledo-Fava & Mónica C. Hernández-Luna & Pedro Fernández-de-Córdoba & Humberto Michinel & Sonia Zaragoza & A Castillo-Guzman & Romeo Selvas-Aguilar, 2019. "Analysis of the Influence Subjective Human Parameters in the Calculation of Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Napolitano, Davide Ferdinando, 2019. "Retrofit of villas on Mediterranean coastlines: Pareto optimization with a view to energy-efficiency and cost-effectiveness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Ciardiello, Adriana & Rosso, Federica & Dell'Olmo, Jacopo & Ciancio, Virgilio & Ferrero, Marco & Salata, Ferdinando, 2020. "Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Yeh, Shih-Chuan, 2019. "High performance natural lighting system combined with SPSC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 226-232.
    18. Haleh Boostani & Polat Hancer, 2018. "A Model for External Walls Selection in Hot and Humid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Jolanta Šadauskienė & Juozas Ramanauskas & Lina Šeduikytė & Mindaugas Daukšys & Algimantas Vasylius, 2015. "A Simplified Methodology for Evaluating the Impact of Point Thermal Bridges on the High-Energy Performance of a Passive House," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Lydon, G.P. & Hofer, J. & Svetozarevic, B. & Nagy, Z. & Schlueter, A., 2017. "Coupling energy systems with lightweight structures for a net plus energy building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 310-326.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:989-:d:100859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.