IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p1043-d101740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Travel: Exploring the Characteristics and Behavior Transformation of Urban Residents in China

Author

Listed:
  • Han Jia

    (College of Communication and Information Science, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35406, USA)

  • Andrea Appolloni

    (Sino-Us Global Logistics Institute (SUGLI), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
    Department of Management and Law Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Columbia, 200133 Rome, Italy)

  • Yunqi Wang

    (Dalian University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

Green travel can ease urban traffic problems and has aroused Chinese government interest regarding their extensive concerns. Although the Chinese government has formulated some policies to encourage residents to perform green travel behavior, non-green travel behavior is still popular. Using the Q method, this study explores the characteristics of Chinese urban residents from the perspective of green travel behavior. The results show that according to values and travel attitudes, urban residents can be divided into three groups; green, light green, and brown travelers. Green travelers care about the environment, have positive environmental attitudes, and implement green travel in their daily lives. Light green travelers require incentives and good conditions to carry out green travel. Brown travelers, however, hold egoistic values and their travel behavior, with little consideration of environment, is mainly affected by individual travel habits. Such results can help governments make suitable and effective policies and initiatives to promote behavior transformation from brown and light green into green travelers.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Jia & Andrea Appolloni & Yunqi Wang, 2017. "Green Travel: Exploring the Characteristics and Behavior Transformation of Urban Residents in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1043-:d:101740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Vos, Jonas & Derudder, Ben & Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Buys, Laurie & Miller, Evonne, 2011. "Conceptualising convenience: Transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane, Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 289-297, January.
    3. Grdzelishvili, Inga & Sathre, Roger, 2011. "Understanding the urban travel attitudes and behavior of Tbilisi residents," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 38-45, January.
    4. Pitombo, C.S. & Kawamoto, E. & Sousa, A.J., 2011. "An exploratory analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 347-357, March.
    5. Scheiner, Joachim & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2012. "Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 250-261.
    6. Marcel Paulssen & Dirk Temme & Akshay Vij & Joan Walker, 2014. "Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 873-888, July.
    7. Ranran Yang & Ruyin Long & Yu Bai & Lanlan Li, 2017. "The Influence of Household Heterogeneity Factors on the Green Travel Behavior of Urban Residents in the East China Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. de Abreu e Silva, João & Morency, Catherine & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2012. "Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1252-1264.
    9. Hsin-Ping Hsu & Jean-Daniel Saphores, 2014. "Impacts of parental gender and attitudes on children’s school travel mode and parental chauffeuring behavior: results for California based on the 2009 National Household Travel Survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 543-565, May.
    10. Susilo, Yusak O. & Williams, Katie & Lindsay, Morag & Dair, Carol, 2012. "The influence of individuals’ environmental attitudes and urban design features on their travel patterns in sustainable neighborhoods in the UK," Working papers in Transport Economics 2012:1, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaqi Luo & Mingxiao Bi & Haibo Kuang, 2021. "Design of Evaluation Scheme for Social Responsibility of China’s Transportation Enterprises from the Perspective of Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Francesc Valls & Josep Roca, 2021. "Visualizing Digital Traces for Sustainable Urban Management: Mapping Tourism Activity on the Virtual Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Ali Keyvanfar & Arezou Shafaghat & Nasiru Zakari Muhammad & M. Salim Ferwati, 2018. "Driving Behaviour and Sustainable Mobility—Policies and Approaches Revisited," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Congjia Huo & Lingming Chen & Peipei Dong, 2022. "Threshold Effect of Industry Heterogeneity on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    5. Junjun Zheng & Yi Cheng & Gang Ma & Xue Han & Liukai Yu, 2020. "Feasibility Analysis of Green Travel in Public Transportation: A Case Study of Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Huaide Wen & Jun Dai, 2021. "The Change of Sources of Growth and Sustainable Development in China: Based on the Extended EKC Explanation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Jianfang Liang & Ruiwen Wang & Jingjun Li, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Chinese Urban Residents’ Perceptions of Sustainable Consumption and Their Efficiency Behavior: A Mediation and Moderation Analysis Based on the Social Practice Appro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Jing Claire Li & Abdelhafid Benamraoui & Neeta Shah & Sudha Mathew, 2021. "Dynamic Capability and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Okewu Emmanuel & Ananya M & Sanjay Misra & Murat Koyuncu, 2020. "A Deep Neural Network-Based Advisory Framework for Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals 1-6," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Suyeon Kim & Seokjun Han & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2019. "Experts’ Perceptions on the Particulate Matter Reduction Effects of Green Open Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Qi Yang & Jianyuan Huang, 2020. "Content Analysis of Family Policy Instruments to Promote the Sustainable Development of Families in China from 1989–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yang & van Wee, Bert & Ettema, Dick, 2023. "Intra-household decisions and the impact of the built environment on activity-travel behavior: A review of the literature," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    3. Maurici Ruiz-Pérez & Joana Maria Seguí-Pons, 2020. "Transport Mode Choice for Residents in a Tourist Destination: The Long Road to Sustainability (the Case of Mallorca, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Thomas Klinger & Martin Lanzendorf, 2016. "Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 243-271, March.
    5. Bilin Han & Jinhee Kim & Harry Timmermans, 2020. "Turn taking behavior in dual earner households with children: a focus on escorting routines," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 203-222, February.
    6. Janke, Julia, 2021. "Re-visiting residential self-selection and dissonance: Does intra-household decision-making change the results?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 379-401.
    7. Yusak O. Susilo & Chengxi Liu, 2016. "The influence of parents’ travel patterns, perceptions and residential self-selectivity to their children travel mode shares," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 357-378, March.
    8. Jonas De Vos & Long Cheng & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Do changes in the residential location lead to changes in travel attitudes? A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2011-2034, August.
    9. Li, Jianling, 2018. "Residential and transit decisions: Insights from focus groups of neighborhoods around transit stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Matthias N. Sweet & Kailey Laidlaw, 2020. "No longer in the driver’s seat: How do affective motivations impact consumer interest in automated vehicles?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2601-2634, October.
    11. Yang, Min & Wu, Jingxian & Rasouli, Soora & Cirillo, Cinzia & Li, Dawei, 2017. "Exploring the impact of residential relocation on modal shift in commute trips: Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 142-152.
    12. Lisa Döring & Maarten Kroesen & Christian Holz-Rau, 2019. "The role of parents’ mobility behavior for dynamics in car availability and commute mode use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 957-994, June.
    13. Gang Cheng & Shuzhi Zhao & Jin Li, 2019. "The Effects of Latent Attitudinal Variables and Sociodemographic Differences on Travel Behavior in Two Small, Underdeveloped Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Hsin-Ping Hsu, 2023. "Domestic burden in an unfamiliar new homeland: gender, immigration, and household-serving trip frequencies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2319-2337, December.
    15. De Vos, Jonas & Cheng, Long & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "The indirect effect of the built environment on travel mode choice: A focus on recent movers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    17. Dacko, Scott G. & Spalteholz, Carolin, 2014. "Upgrading the city: Enabling intermodal travel behaviour," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 222-235.
    18. Ding, Yu & Lu, Huapu, 2016. "Activity participation as a mediating variable to analyze the effect of land use on travel behavior: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    19. Gil Solá, Ana, 2016. "Constructing work travel inequalities: The role of household gender contracts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 32-40.
    20. Giménez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Velilla, Jorge & Ortega, Raquel, 2022. "Revisiting excess commuting and self-employment: The case of Latin America," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1179, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1043-:d:101740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.