IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p582-d95537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Household Smart Water Metering in Spain: Insights from the Experience of Remote Meter Reading in Alicante

Author

Listed:
  • Hug March

    (Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 08860 Castelldefels, Spain)

  • Álvaro-Francisco Morote

    (Interuniversity Institute of Geography, University of Alicante, 03080 Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Spain)

  • Antonio-Manuel Rico

    (Interuniversity Institute of Geography, University of Alicante, 03080 Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Spain)

  • David Saurí

    (Departament de Geografia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain)

Abstract

Since the past few years, the smart city paradigm has been influencing sustainable urban water resources management. Smart metering schemes for end users have become an important strategy for water utilities to have an in-depth and fine-grained knowledge about urban water use. Beyond reducing certain labor costs, such as those related to manual meter reading, such detailed and continuous flow of information is said to enhance network efficiency and improve water planning by having more detailed demand patterns and forecasts. Research focusing on those initiatives has been very prolific in countries such as Australia. However, less academic attention has been paid to the development of smart metering in other geographies. This paper focuses on smart water metering in Spain and, more particularly, documents and reflects on the experience of the city of Alicante (southeastern Spain), a pioneer case of massive deployment of remote reading of water meters at the household level and for large urban customers. Through data and interviews with water managers from the water utility, we shed light on the costs and early benefits, as well as the potentialities and (unexpected) problems of this technology to contribute to more sustainable urban water cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Hug March & Álvaro-Francisco Morote & Antonio-Manuel Rico & David Saurí, 2017. "Household Smart Water Metering in Spain: Insights from the Experience of Remote Meter Reading in Alicante," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:582-:d:95537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fróes Lima, Carlos Alberto & Portillo Navas, José Ricardo, 2012. "Smart metering and systems to support a conscious use of water and electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 528-540.
    2. David Gibbs & Rob Krueger & Gordon MacLeod, 2013. "Grappling with Smart City Politics in an Era of Market Triumphalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2151-2157, August.
    3. Amy Glasmeier & Susan Christopherson, 2015. "Thinking about smart cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 3-12.
    4. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    5. Beal, C.D. & Flynn, J., 2015. "Toward the digital water age: Survey and case studies of Australian water utility smart-metering programs," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 29-37.
    6. Rabari, Chirag & Storper, Michael, 2015. "The digital skin of cities: urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63028, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Chirag Rabari & Michael Storper, 2015. "Editor's choice The digital skin of cities: urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 27-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Gumz & Diego Castro Fettermann & Enzo Morosini Frazzon & Mirko Kück, 2022. "Using Industry 4.0’s Big Data and IoT to Perform Feature-Based and Past Data-Based Energy Consumption Predictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Brenda Espinosa Apráez & Saskia Lavrijssen, 2018. "Exploring the regulatory challenges of a possible rollout of smart water meters in the Netherlands," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 19(3-4), pages 159-179, September.
    3. Amankwaa, Godfred & Heeks, Richard & Browne, Alison L., 2023. "Smartening up: User experience with smart water metering infrastructure in an African city," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Fettermann, Diego Castro & Cavalcante, Caroline Gobbo Sá & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Avalone, Marianne Costa, 2020. "Configuration of a smart meter for Brazilian customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Steven Hendrik Andreas Koop & Sharon Helena Pascale Clevers & Elisabeth Johanna Maria Blokker & Stijn Brouwer, 2021. "Public Attitudes towards Digital Water Meters for Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Sarah A. Elariane & Jean Dubé, 2019. "Is Smart Housing a Good Deal? An Answer Based on Monte Carlo Net Present Value Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Carlos J. Baños & María Hernández & Antonio M. Rico & Jorge Olcina, 2019. "The Hydrosocial Cycle in Coastal Tourist Destinations in Alicante, Spain: Increasing Resilience to Drought," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Koo, A Mi & Kim, Ju-Hee & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2022. "Household willingness to pay for a smart water metering and monitoring system: The case of South Korea," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Antti Silvast & Robin Williams & Sampsa Hyysalo & Kjetil Rommetveit & Charles Raab, 2018. "Who ‘Uses’ Smart Grids? The Evolving Nature of User Representations in Layered Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2019. "Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Ryan Burns & Max Andrucki, 2021. "Smart cities: Who cares?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 12-30, February.
    3. Constance Carr & Markus Hesse, 2020. "When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto’s Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 69-83.
    4. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2019. "Smart cities and the citizen-driven internet of things: A qualitative inquiry into an emerging smart city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 44-53.
    5. Chiara Cavalieri & Michael Stas & Marcelo Rovira Torres, 2020. "The ‘Analogue City’: Mapping and Acting in Antwerp’s Digital Geographies," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 289-300.
    6. James Cummings, 2020. "“Look How Many Gays There Are Here”: Digital Technologies and Non-Heterosexual Space in Haikou," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 347-357.
    7. E.V. Popov, 2021. "Drivers of the Economy in the Context of the Coronavirus Pandemic," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(1), pages 5-30.
    8. Dannenberg Peter & Braun Boris & Fuchs Martina & Revilla Diez Javier, 2018. "Dynamics in an unequal world," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, De Gruyter, vol. 62(2), pages 87-91, May.
    9. Małgorzata Baran & Monika Kłos & Monika Chodorek & Karolina Marchlewska-Patyk, 2022. "The Resilient Smart City Model–Proposal for Polish Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Amy Glasmeier & Susan Christopherson, 2015. "Thinking about smart cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 3-12.
    11. Emilia Rönkkö & Aulikki Herneoja & Essi Oikarinen, 2018. "Cybernetics and the 4D Smart City: Smartness as Awareness," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, April.
    12. Solis, Miriam & Bashar, Samira Binte, 2022. "Social equity implications of advanced water metering infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    14. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2018. "Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 330-339.
    15. Pucci, Paola & Vecchio, Giovanni, 2019. "Trespassing for mobilities. Operational directions for addressing mobile lives," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Libor Měsíček, 2015. "Context Sources and their Processing in Company Security," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 44-51.
    17. David McGillivray & Severin Guillard & Emma Reid, 2020. "Urban Connective Action: The Case of Events Hosted in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 252-266.
    18. Sawsan Abutabenjeh & Julius A. Nukpezah & Annus Azhar, 2022. "Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Local Economic Development?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 3-16, February.
    19. Eunmi Lee & Sanghyuk Lee & Kyeong Soo Kim & Van Huy Pham & Jinbae Sul, 2019. "Analysis of Public Complaints to Identify Priority Policy Areas: Evidence from a Satellite City around Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Ulysses Sengupta & Mahmud Tantoush & May Bassanino & Eric Cheung, 2020. "The Hybrid Space of Collaborative Location-Based Mobile Games and the City: A Case Study of Ingress," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 358-370.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:582-:d:95537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.