IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1865-d115258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Leisure Venues Are and Why? A Geospatial Perspective in Wuhan, Central China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaolin Liu

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial Information Technology, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ying Jing

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Enxiang Cai

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jiaxing Cui

    (School of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yiyun Chen

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial Information Technology, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Urban leisure venues proffer spatial carriers for citizens’ leisure activities and their functions rely heavily on the spatial configuration, which have largely been ignored. The increasing needs for healthy leisure life and the availability of geospatial open data provide a rising opportunity to fill this gap. To examine the spatial distribution of leisure venues and explore its underlying dominating factors, we adopt geospatial analysis techniques—point pattern analysis and cluster analysis with multi-sources geospatial data in Wuhan, Central China. Results conclude interesting spatial discrepancy based on a three-level clustered pattern of 86520 leisure venues. We find that (1) most clusters are in urban center along the Yangtze River with all 1st-level clusters and plentiful 2nd-level and 3rd-level clusters; (2) There are just sporadic clusters in suburban areas—no 1st-level, merely one 2nd-level and some few 3rd-level ones. Moreover, we demonstrate three underlying dominating factors (i.e., the policy, population and economy) and identify that (1) No systematic (spatial-relevant) leisure policy framework is formed; (2) Population density and commercial centers have positive correlation with the distribution of leisure venues. This study contributes to spatial-relevant leisure policy-making for facilitating healthy leisure life, optimizing leisure space, guiding people-oriented urbanization transition and promoting urban competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaolin Liu & Ying Jing & Enxiang Cai & Jiaxing Cui & Yang Zhang & Yiyun Chen, 2017. "How Leisure Venues Are and Why? A Geospatial Perspective in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1865-:d:115258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiang Wei & Hailin Qu & Emily Ma, 2016. "How Does Leisure Time Affect Production Efficiency? Evidence from China, Japan, and the US," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 101-122, May.
    2. Bin Wang & Wenzhong Shi & Zelang Miao, 2015. "Confidence Analysis of Standard Deviational Ellipse and Its Extension into Higher Dimensional Euclidean Space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Mark L. Burkey & Joy Bhadury & H. A. Eiselt, 2011. "Voronoi Diagrams and Their Uses," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H. A. Eiselt & Vladimir Marianov (ed.), Foundations of Location Analysis, chapter 0, pages 445-470, Springer.
    4. Mark Aguiar & Erik Hurst, 2007. "Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time Over Five Decades," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(3), pages 969-1006.
    5. Graham, Carol & Zhou, Shaojie & Zhang, Junyi, 2017. "Happiness and Health in China: The Paradox of Progress," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 231-244.
    6. Yoshitaka Iwasaki, 2007. "Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: what are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 233-264, June.
    7. Andreja Brajša-Žganec & Marina Merkaš & Iva Šverko, 2011. "Quality of Life and Leisure Activities: How do Leisure Activities Contribute to Subjective Well-Being?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 81-91, May.
    8. David Newman & Louis Tay & Ed Diener, 2014. "Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 555-578, June.
    9. Chenglin Qin & Xinyue Ye & Yingxia Liu, 2017. "Spatial Club Convergence of Regional Economic Growth in Inland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Sofia Izquierdo Sanchez & Caroline Elliott & Robert Simmons, 2016. "Substitution between leisure activities: a quasi-natural experiment using sports viewing and cinema attendance," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(40), pages 3848-3860, August.
    11. Crelis F. Rammelt & Maarten Van Schie & Fredu Nega Tegabu & Maggi Leung, 2017. "Vaguely Right or Exactly Wrong: Measuring the (Spatial) Distribution of Land Resources, Income and Wealth in Rural Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Claudia Schmiedeberg & Jette Schröder, 2017. "Leisure Activities and Life Satisfaction: an Analysis with German Panel Data," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 137-151, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Csaba Sidor & Branislav Kršák & Ľubomír Štrba, 2019. "Identification of Distorted Official Hospitality Statistics’ and Their Impact on DMOs’ Funding’s Sustainability: Case Notes from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Shaojun Liu & Yao Long & Ling Zhang & Hao Liu, 2021. "Quantifying and Characterizing Urban Leisure Activities by Merging Multiple Sensing Big Data: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Susan (Sixue) Jia, 2018. "Leisure Motivation and Satisfaction: A Text Mining of Yoga Centres, Yoga Consumers, and Their Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Ying Jing & Ding Ma & Yaolin Liu & Jiaxing Cui & Sheng Zhang & Yiyun Chen, 2021. "Decoding the Street-Based Spatiality of Urban Gyms: Implications for Healthy City Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Ying Jing & Junjiao Shu & Rushan Wang & Xiang Zhang, 2021. "Tempo‐spatial variability of urban leisure functional zones: An analysis based on geo‐big data," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1852-1865, September.
    6. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Xueqi Wang & Zhichong Zou, 2021. "Open Data Based Urban For-Profit Music Venues Spatial Layout Pattern Discovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. KangJae Jerry Lee & Seonghee Cho & Eui Kyung Kim & Sunhwan Hwang, 2020. "Do More Leisure Time and Leisure Repertoire Make Us Happier? An Investigation of the Curvilinear Relationships," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1727-1747, June.
    2. Xinyu (Judy) Hu & Larissa K. Barber & Alecia M. Santuzzi, 2021. "Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2003-2029, June.
    3. Sergio Cocozza & Pier Luigi Sacco & Giuseppe Matarese & Gayle D. Maffulli & Nicola Maffulli & Donatella Tramontano, 2020. "Participation to Leisure Activities and Well-Being in a Group of Residents of Naples-Italy: The Role of Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Aiste Dirzyte & Aleksandras Patapas & Aidas Perminas, 2022. "Associations between Leisure Preferences, Mindfulness, Psychological Capital, and Life Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Pengfei Wang & Xiang Wei & Xu Yingwei & Cao Xiaodan, 2022. "The Impact of Residents' Leisure Time Allocation Mode on Individual Subjective Well-being: The Case of China," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1831-1866, June.
    6. Fatih Terzi & Handan Türkoğlu & Fulin Bölen & Perver Baran & Tayfun Salihoğlu, 2015. "Residents’ Perception of Cultural Activities as Quality of Life in Istanbul," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 211-234, May.
    7. Philipp Schulz & Julian Schulte & Sven Raube & Hala Disouky & Christian Kandler, 2018. "The Role of Leisure Interest and Engagement for Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1135-1150, April.
    8. Cui, Dan & Wei, Xiang & Wu, Dianting & Cui, Nana & Nijkamp, Peter, 2019. "Leisure time and labor productivity: A new economic view rooted from sociological perspective," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-24.
    9. David Newman & Louis Tay & Ed Diener, 2014. "Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 555-578, June.
    10. Oliviero Carboni & Paolo Russu, 2015. "Assessing Regional Wellbeing in Italy: An Application of Malmquist–DEA and Self-organizing Map Neural Clustering," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 677-700, July.
    11. Michael Mutz, 2019. "Life Satisfaction and the UEFA EURO 2016: Findings from a Nation-Wide Longitudinal Study in Germany," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 375-391, April.
    12. Bimonte, Salvatore & Faralla, Valeria, 2016. "Does residents' perceived life satisfaction vary with tourist season? A two-step survey in a Mediterranean destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    13. Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2018. "Impacts of Leisure and Tourism on the Elderly’s Quality of Life in Intimacy: A Comparative Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Miika Kujanpää & Christine Syrek & Dirk Lehr & Ulla Kinnunen & Jo Annika Reins & Jessica Bloom, 2021. "Need Satisfaction and Optimal Functioning at Leisure and Work: A Longitudinal Validation Study of the DRAMMA Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 681-707, February.
    15. M. Joseph Sirgy & Muzaffer Uysal & Stefan Kruger, 2017. "Towards a Benefits Theory of Leisure Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 205-228, March.
    16. Yu-Chih Huang & Jen-Son Cheng & Lan Lan Chang, 2020. "Understanding Leisure Trip Experience and Subjective Well-Being: an Illustration of Creative Travel Experience," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(4), pages 1161-1182, September.
    17. Attila Lengyel & Sándor Kovács & Anetta Müller & Lóránt Dávid & Szilvia Szőke & Éva Bácsné Bába, 2019. "Sustainability and Subjective Well-Being: How Students Weigh Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Elena Dragioti & Björn Gerdle & Lars-Åke Levin & Lars Bernfort & Huan-Ji Dong, 2021. "Association between Participation Activities, Pain Severity, and Psychological Distress in Old Age: A Population-Based Study of Swedish Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Daniel Wheatley & Craig Bickerton, 2019. "Measuring changes in subjective well-being from engagement in the arts, culture and sport," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(3), pages 421-442, September.
    20. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy, 2011. "Leisure and Subjective Well-being," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1865-:d:115258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.