IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2016i1p2-d85886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Groundwater Resource Management under Uncertainty Using a Retrospective Optimization Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Gislar E. Kifanyi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Julius M. Ndambuki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Samuel N. Odai

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB KNUST Kumasi, Ghana)

Abstract

Water resources are a major concern for any socio-economic development. As the quality of many surface fresh water sources increasingly deteriorate, more pressure is being imparted into groundwater aquifers. Since groundwater and the aquifers that host it are inherently vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts, there is a need for sustainable pumping strategies. However, groundwater resource management is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of aquifer systems. Aquifer hydrogeology is highly uncertain, and thus it is imperative that this uncertainty is accounted for when managing groundwater resource pumping. This, therefore, underscores the need for an efficient optimization tool which can sustainably manage the resource under uncertainty conditions. In this paper, we apply a procedure which is new within the context of groundwater resource management—the Retrospective Optimization Approximation (ROA) method. This method is capable of designing sustainable groundwater pumping strategies for aquifers which are characterized by uncertainty arising due to scarcity of input data. ROA framework solves and evaluates a sequence of optimization sub-problems in an increasing number of realizations. We used k-means clustering sampling technique for the realizations selection. The methodology is demonstrated through application to an hypothetical example. The optimization problem was solved and analyzed using “Active Set” algorithm implemented under MATLAB environment. The results indicate that the ROA sampling based method is a promising approach for optimizing groundwater pumping rates under conditions of hydrogeological uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Gislar E. Kifanyi & Julius M. Ndambuki & Samuel N. Odai, 2016. "A Quantitative Groundwater Resource Management under Uncertainty Using a Retrospective Optimization Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:2-:d:85886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yung-Jaan Lee & Chuan-Ming Tung & Piin-Rong Lee & Shih-Chien Lin, 2016. "Personal Water Footprint in Taiwan: A Case Study of Yunlin County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Jiyang Tian & Chuanzhe Li & Jia Liu & Fuliang Yu & Shuanghu Cheng & Nana Zhao & Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar, 2016. "Groundwater Depth Prediction Using Data-Driven Models with the Assistance of Gamma Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Wagner, Janet M. & Shamir, Uri & Marks, David H., 1994. "Containing groundwater contamination: Planning models using stochastic programming with recourse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 1-26, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han-Shen Chen & Wan-Yu Liu & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Eco-Security to Assess Sustainable Development in Liuqiu Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Maqsood, Imran & Huang, Guo H. & Scott Yeomans, Julian, 2005. "An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 208-225, November.
    3. Ahmadhon Akbarkhonovich Kamolov & Suhyun Park, 2021. "Prediction of Depth of Seawater Using Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm of Crowdsourced SONAR Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Guojing Li & Xinru Han & Qiyou Luo & Wenbo Zhu & Jing Zhao, 2021. "A Study on the Relationship between Income Change and the Water Footprint of Food Consumption in Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Dongxiao Niu & Weibo Zhao & Si Li & Rongjun Chen, 2018. "Cost Forecasting of Substation Projects Based on Cuckoo Search Algorithm and Support Vector Machines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Wang, G.Q. & Huang, Y.F., 2009. "FSWM: A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic water-management model for agricultural sustainability under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1807-1818, December.
    7. Yongho Ko & Seungwoo Han, 2017. "A Duration Prediction Using a Material-Based Progress Management Methodology for Construction Operation Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Qiang Fu & Ke Zhao & Dong Liu & Qiuxiang Jiang & Tianxiao Li & Changhong Zhu, 2016. "Two-Stage Interval-Parameter Stochastic Programming Model Based on Adaptive Water Resource Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 2097-2109, April.
    9. Yong Li & Guo Huang, 2008. "Interval-parameter Two-stage Stochastic Nonlinear Programming for Water Resources Management under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(6), pages 681-698, June.
    10. Akram Rahbar & Ali Mirarabi & Mohammad Nakhaei & Mahdi Talkhabi & Maryam Jamali, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Data-Driven Models (SVR, ANFIS, and ANNs) for Daily Karst Spring Discharge Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 589-609, January.
    11. Yuheng Yang & Xi Zhang & Leran Chang & Yufei Cheng & Shengle Cao, 2018. "A Method of Evaluating Ecological Compensation Under Different Property Rights and Stages: A Case Study of the Xiaoqing River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Melissa Demartini & Claudia Pinna & Bahar Aliakbarian & Flavio Tonelli & Sergio Terzi, 2018. "Soft Drink Supply Chain Sustainability: A Case Based Approach to Identify and Explain Best Practices and Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    13. L. Shao & X. Qin & Y. Xu, 2011. "A Conditional Value-at-Risk Based Inexact Water Allocation Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(9), pages 2125-2145, July.
    14. Han-Shen Chen, 2017. "Evaluation and Analysis of Eco-Security in Environmentally Sensitive Areas Using an Emergy Ecological Footprint," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Lin, Q.G. & Huang, G.H. & Bass, B. & Qin, X.S., 2009. "IFTEM: An interval-fuzzy two-stage stochastic optimization model for regional energy systems planning under uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 868-878, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:2-:d:85886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.