IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p290-d66270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on Sustainability in Architectural Education in Asia—With a Focus on Professional Degree Curricula

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Porras Álvarez

    (Department of Architecture, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02481, Korea)

  • Kyungsun Lee

    (School of Architecture, Hongik University, 94 Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04066, Korea)

  • Jiyoung Park

    (Department of Architecture, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Sun-Young Rieh

    (Department of Architecture, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Korea)

Abstract

Architectural education is a key factor in the re-thinking of the whole industry toward a system of more sustainable buildings and cities. Asia is the continent with the highest population growth and the fastest urbanization rate on earth. It is necessary to educate professionals with a well-balanced and integrated knowledge of local issues and global standards. This paper focuses on education for sustainable architecture in Asian countries. This is an exploratory study, analyzing the curricula of 20 selected influential schools in 11 countries. Sustainability-related courses are identified, classified and summarized in qualitative tables (course matrix) and in quantitative graphs. The analysis helps to identify trends and regional or individual uniqueness. The results show that sustainability education is organized in very diverse ways, according to contents, intensity and sequence. The percentages of sustainable courses range from less than 5% to 25%. Technology-related courses are the most numerous and homogeneous. Sustainability design studios show the greatest variation, from zero to almost 100%. General theory courses help in dealing with sustainability issues through traditional and vernacular philosophies, technologies and strategies that are very adequate to their geographical and cultural settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Porras Álvarez & Kyungsun Lee & Jiyoung Park & Sun-Young Rieh, 2016. "A Comparative Study on Sustainability in Architectural Education in Asia—With a Focus on Professional Degree Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:290-:d:66270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert B. Gibson, 2006. "Beyond The Pillars: Sustainability Assessment As A Framework For Effective Integration Of Social, Economic And Ecological Considerations In Significant Decision-Making," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 259-280.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Sandra Wilhelm Hamiti & Hans Wydler, 2014. "Supporting the Integration of Sustainability into Higher Education Curricula—A Case Study from Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyu Shi & Xue Fang & Zhoufan Chen & Tyson Keen Phillips & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2020. "A Didactic Pedagogical Approach toward Sustainable Architectural Education through Robotic Tectonics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Maycon Sedrez & Jing Xie & Ali Cheshmehzangi, 2021. "Integrating Water Sensitive Design in the Architectural Design Studio in China: Challenges and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Summers & Melissa McCullough & Elizabeth Smith & Maureen Gwinn & Fran Kremer & Mya Sjogren & Andrew Geller & Michael Slimak, 2014. "The Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Research Approach to Assisting Community Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Uta Schirpke & Lukas Egarter Vigl & Erich Tasser & Ulrike Tappeiner, 2019. "Analyzing Spatial Congruencies and Mismatches between Supply, Demand and Flow of Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Rabee Rustum & Anu Mary John Kurichiyanil & Shaun Forrest & Corrado Sommariva & Adebayo J. Adeloye & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani & Miklas Scholz, 2020. "Sustainability Ranking of Desalination Plants Using Mamdani Fuzzy Logic Inference Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Justyna Maliszewska-Nienartowicz, 2020. "Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities as an Important Element of Economic and Social Development: The European Union Case," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1084-1099.
    5. Rocio A., Diaz-Chavez, 2011. "Assessing biofuels: Aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 5763-5769, October.
    6. Durgham Darwazeh & Amelia Clarke & Jeffrey Wilson, 2021. "Framework for Establishing a Sustainable Medical Facility: A Case Study of Medical Tourism in Jordan," World, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    8. Philipp Haessler, 2020. "Strategic Decisions between Short-Term Profit and Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Ju Liu & Bo Bengtsson & Helena Bohman & Karin Staffansson Pauli, 2020. "A System Model and An Innovation Approach toward Sustainable Housing Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Paolo Prosperi & Iuri Peri, 2014. "Concepts and methods for sustainability assessment: Insights from food security," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 23-34.
    11. Ditty, J.M. & Rezende, C.E., 2014. "Unjust and unsustainable: A case study of the Açu port industrial complex," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 82-88.
    12. Van Schoubroeck, Sophie & Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven & Malina, Robert, 2018. "A review of sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 115-126.
    13. Kushwanth Koya & Gobinda Chowdhury, 2020. "Cultural Heritage Information Practices and iSchools Education for Achieving Sustainable Development," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 696-710, June.
    14. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    15. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    16. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    17. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    19. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    20. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:290-:d:66270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.