IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i12p1310-d85031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Cultures of Sustainability through Community-Engaged Museums: The History and Re-Emergence of Ecomuseums in Canada and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn C. Sutter

    (Royal Saskatchewan Museum, 2340 Albert St, Regina, SK S4P 2V7, Canada)

  • Tobias Sperlich

    (Department of Anthropology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Pkwy, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Douglas Worts

    (WorldViews Consulting, 4 Earl St., Toronto, ON M4Y 1M3, Canada)

  • René Rivard

    (Cultura Consulting, 1070 avenue Lajoie, porte 12, Outremont, PQ H2V 1N6, Canada)

  • Lynne Teather

    (Department of Museum Studies, University of Toronto, 140 St. George St., Toronto, ON M5S 3G6, Canada)

Abstract

In recent decades, communities around the world have been reacting to the forces of globalization by re-focusing on the local, leading to the democratization of culture, heritage, and related concepts. By attempting to reconnect locals with their own sense of belonging, to reinvigorate a pride of place, and to foster wellbeing, communities have increasingly and successfully turned to features that make their local history, heritage, and environment unique or distinctive. In turn, democratization processes have led to sustainable forms of economic and community development through ecomuseums and other examples of community-engaged museums. This paper aims to deepen our understanding of relevant community-based culture and heritage initiatives by reflecting on the development of ecomuseums in Canada and the USA. As part of the larger museum community, ecomuseums tend to be accessible entities that are not affiliated with political or other convictions or viewpoints. This makes them uniquely positioned to foster creative change and adaptation aimed at sustainability, yet their evolution in North America has not been examined from this perspective. To address this gap, this paper will highlight the Haute-Beauce Ecomuseum in Québec and the Ak-Chin Him Dak Ecomuseum in Arizona, which have long histories as North American ecomuseums and represent two very different cultural and geographic contexts. We also reflect on the history of ecomuseums in Canada, and their recent emergence in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn C. Sutter & Tobias Sperlich & Douglas Worts & René Rivard & Lynne Teather, 2016. "Fostering Cultures of Sustainability through Community-Engaged Museums: The History and Re-Emergence of Ecomuseums in Canada and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:1310-:d:85031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annie Tubadji & Brian Osoba & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Culture-based development in the USA: culture as a factor for economic welfare and social well-being at a county level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 277-303, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Belén San Pedro Veledo & Inés López Manrique & Inés Fombella Coto & Yolanda Del Cura González & Beatriz Sánchez Martínez & Ana Isabel Álvarez González, 2018. "Social Sciences, Art and Physical Activity in Leisure Environments. An Inter-Disciplinary Project for Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Giusy Pappalardo, 2020. "Community-Based Processes for Revitalizing Heritage: Questioning Justice in the Experimental Practice of Ecomuseums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Francesca Simeoni & Veronica De Crescenzo, 2018. "Ecomuseums (on Clean Energy), Cycle Tourism and Civic Crowdfunding: A New Match for Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Jirawan Sirivanichkul & Koompong Noobanjong & Supornchai Saengratwatchara & Weeranan Damrongsakul & Chaturong Louhapensang, 2018. "Interpretation of a Local Museum in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Eduard Cristobal-Fransi & Natalia Daries & Eva Martin-Fuentes & Yolanda Montegut-Salla, 2020. "Industrial Heritage 2.0: Internet Presence and Development of the Electronic Commerce of Industrial Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Mara Cerquetti & Concetta Ferrara, 2018. "Marketing Research for Cultural Heritage Conservation and Sustainability: Lessons from the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Izabela Luiza Pop & Anca Borza & Anuța Buiga & Diana Ighian & Rita Toader, 2019. "Achieving Cultural Sustainability in Museums: A Step Toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Roberto Pierdicca & Marina Paolanti & Roberto Bacchiani & Roberto de Leo & Bruno Bisceglia & Emanuele Frontoni, 2019. "Accurate Modeling of the Microwave Treatment of Works of Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Revisiting the Balassa–Samuelson effect: International tourism and cultural proximity," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(8), pages 915-944, December.
    2. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & He Zhu & Zhe Cheng, 2016. "Culture Sustainability: Culture Quotient (CQ) and Its Quantitative Empirical Application to Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Marco Bellandi & Daniela Campus & Alessandro Carraro & Erica Santini, 2020. "Accumulation of cultural capital at the intersection of socio-demographic features and productive specializations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(1), pages 1-34, March.
    4. Craig Wesley Carpenter & Anders Van Sandt & Scott Loveridge, 2022. "Measurement error in US regional economic data," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 57-80, January.
    5. Yue Dai, 2021. "A Behavioral Cultural-Based Development Analysis of Entrepreneurship in China," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Annie Tubadji & Vassilis Angelis & Peter Nijkamp, 2016. "Endogenous intangible resources and their place in the institutional hierarchy," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 36(1), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Douglas S. Noonan & Shiri M. Breznitz & Sana Maqbool, 2021. "Flocking to the crowd: Cultural entrepreneur mobility guided by homophily, market size, or amenities?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 577-611, December.
    8. Luisa Iachan & François Moreau & Paul Heritage & Leandro Valiati & Eliana Sousa Silva, 2023. "How does urban violence impact choices of cultural participation? The case of the Maré favela complex in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(4), pages 609-641, December.
    9. Giovanis, Eleftherios, 2023. "Cultural Participation and Extra Disability and Health Costs of Syrian Migrants in Turkey," MPRA Paper 116299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Tubadji, Annie & Nijkamp, Peter, 2017. "Green Online vs Green Offline preferences on local public goods trade-offs and house prices," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 72-86.
    11. Iveta Vrabková & Jiří BeÄ ica, 2021. "The Technical and Allocative Efficiency of the Regional Public Galleries in the Czech Republic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    12. Juan Lucio & Marco Palomeque, 2023. "Music preferences as an instrument of emotional self-regulation along the business cycle," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(2), pages 181-204, June.
    13. Lingling Ju & Dong Yan & Xiaoyan Wang & Shouzhong Hu, 2016. "Influence Model Research of Brand Culture on Home Textile Consumption Behavior," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 34-41, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:1310-:d:85031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.