Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Refocusing Seafood Sustainability as a Journey Using the Law of the Minimum

Contents:

Author Info

  • Michael Tlusty

    ()
    (John H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Heather Tausig

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Tania Taranovski

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Meghan Jeans

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Matt Thompson

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Michelle Cho

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Michael Eppling

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Jason J. Clermont

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Jennifer Goldstein

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Elizabeth Fitzsimons

    ()
    (Sustainable Seafood Program, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Globally, seafood is an important protein source because it is a nutritious food source produced with relative efficiency compared to other proteins. Because of problems related to overfishing and deleterious environmental impacts, over the last decade, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have increased their focus on seafood sustainability while businesses have incorporated this issue into their corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Sustainability is a concept that can be addressed in terms of scale of issues considered (narrow vs . broad) as well as the scope of how they are measured (undemanding or demanding). Currently, the message of seafood sustainability is becoming complicated in that the journey toward sustainability is being referred to as having achieved a state of sustainability. In addition, companies making a “sustainable” declaration are often at different points in the “scale/scope” arena. As a result, buyers, retailers and consumers have difficulty differentiating between these products. Furthermore, they often assume that a “sustainable” product has no further need for improvement, when in fact this is rarely the case. This change in reference from a continual process (a journey) to a static point (it is sustainable) limits further advances in seafood sustainability and the drive for continual improvement. Herein, the “Law of the Minimum”, growth toward an end goal will occur until one factor becomes limiting, is adopted as an analogy for sustainability. By refocusing the sustainability discussion on a progressive series of challenges to be met, the discussion will return to the journey as the central point. Doing so will help refresh the dialogue around seafood, and to create new opportunities for improvement.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/9/2038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/9/2038/
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by MDPI, Open Access Journal in its journal Sustainability.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 9 (August)
    Pages: 2038-2050

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:9:p:2038-2050:d:19815

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.mdpi.com/

    Related research

    Keywords: aquaculture; continual improvement; ecolabel; fisheries; law of the minimum; Liebig; phenomenology; seafood; sustainability;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Hueting, Roefie & Reijnders, Lucas, 2004. "Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3-4), pages 249-260, October.
    2. Jacquet, Jennifer L. & Pauly, Daniel, 2007. "The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 308-313, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:9:p:2038-2050:d:19815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.