Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Importance of Considering Product Loss Rates in Life Cycle Assessment: The Example of Closure Systems for Bottled Wine

Contents:

Author Info

  • Anna Kounina

    ()
    (Quantis, Parc Scientifique EPFL, Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
    Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Elisa Tatti

    ()
    (Quantis, Parc Scientifique EPFL, Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Sebastien Humbert

    ()
    (Quantis, Parc Scientifique EPFL, Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Richard Pfister

    ()
    (Praxis Energia, rue Verte, 1261 Le Vaud, Switzerland)

  • Amanda Pike

    ()
    (Division of Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75189, Sweden
    Quantis, 283 Franklin St. Floor 2, Boston, MA 02110, USA)

  • Jean-François Ménard

    ()
    (Quantis, 395 rue Laurier Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2V 2K3, Canada)

  • Yves Loerincik

    ()
    (Quantis, Parc Scientifique EPFL, Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Olivier Jolliet

    ()
    (Quantis, Parc Scientifique EPFL, Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Purpose: The objective of this study is to discuss the implications of product loss rates in terms of the environmental performance of bottled wine. Wine loss refers to loss occurring when the consumer does not consume the wine contained in the bottle and disposes of it because of taste alteration, which is caused by inadequate product protection rendering the wine unpalatable to a knowledgeable consumer. The decision of whether or not to drink the wine in such cases is guided by subjective consumer taste perception and wine quality expectation (drinking the bottle or disposing of the wine down the drain and replacing it with a new bottle). This study aims to illustrate the importance of accurately defining system boundaries related to wine packaging systems. Methods: The environmental impacts resulting from wine loss rates as related to two types of wine bottle closures—natural cork stoppers and screw caps—have been estimated based on literature review data and compared to the impact of the respective closure system. The system studied relates to the functional unit “a 750 mL bottle of drinkable wine” and includes bottled wine, bottle and closure production, wine production, wine loss and wine poured down the drain. Results: The range of wine alteration rates due to corked wine is estimated to be 2–5% based on interviews with wine experts. Consumer behavior was assessed through a sensitivity study on replacement rates. When the increase in loss rate with the cork stopper is higher than 1.2% (corresponding to 3.5% corked wine multiplied by a consumer replacement rate of 35%), the influence of losses on the impact results is higher than that of the closure material itself. The different closures and associated wine losses represent less than 5% of the total life cycle impact of bottled wine.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/10/2673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/10/2673/
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by MDPI, Open Access Journal in its journal Sustainability.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 10 (October)
    Pages: 2673-2706

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:10:p:2673-2706:d:20746

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.mdpi.com/

    Related research

    Keywords: life cycle assessment; losses; wine; closure; packaging; cork stopper; screw cap; system boundaries;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:10:p:2673-2706:d:20746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.