IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3150-d1372962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving Factors in Carbon Emission Reduction in Prefabricated Building Supply Chains Based on Structural Equation Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Guohao Fan

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zixuan Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

As one of the development paths of construction industrialization, prefabricated buildings (PBs) are an important means for China’s construction industry to achieve the “double carbon” goal. To better leverage the energy-saving and emission-reduction benefits of prefabricated buildings, we have analyzed the driving factors and driving paths of carbon emission reduction in prefabricated buildings from the perspective of the supply chain. The carbon emission-reduction driving index system of prefabricated building supply chains (PBSCs) was constructed through the literature review method and the questionnaire investigation method. The structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the relationship of each driving factor. The importance of each driving factor was quantitatively analyzed on account of the model’s operation results. The results showed: the order of importance of driver levels is technology-driven > economic-driven > market-driven > government-driven > supply chain coordination-driven. The key driving factors are summarized based on the ranking of driving factor indicators in each dimension, providing a reference for participants in PBSCs to adopt low-carbon measures and providing a basis for government departments to formulate carbon emission-reduction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Guohao Fan & Zixuan Liu, 2024. "Driving Factors in Carbon Emission Reduction in Prefabricated Building Supply Chains Based on Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3150-:d:1372962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waltho, Cynthia & Elhedhli, Samir & Gzara, Fatma, 2019. "Green supply chain network design: A review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 305-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Salehian, Farhad & Kian, Hadi & Hosseini, Seyed Teimoor & Mina, Hassan, 2023. "A location-inventory-routing problem to design a circular closed-loop supply chain network with carbon tax policy for achieving circular economy: An augmented epsilon-constraint approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria, 2020. "Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 168-190.
    3. V. Sathiya & M. Chinnadurai & S. Ramabalan & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Mobile robots and evolutionary optimization algorithms for green supply chain management in a used-car resale company," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9110-9138, June.
    4. Majid Eskandarpour & Pierre Dejax & Olivier Péton, 2019. "Multi-Directional Local Search for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design," Post-Print hal-02407741, HAL.
    5. Roy Setiawan & Rabia Salman & Bari Galimovich Khairov & Valeriy Vasilyevich Karpov & Svetlana Dmitrievna Danshina & Lidia Vladimirovna Vasyutkina & Natalia Alekseevna Prodanova & Viacheslav Zhenzhebir, 2021. "Sustainable Closed-Loop Mask Supply Chain Network Design Using Mathematical Modeling and a Fuzzy Multi-Objective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Tao, Yi & Wu, Jianhuang & Lai, Xiaofan & Wang, Fan, 2020. "Network planning and operation of sustainable closed-loop supply chains in emerging markets: Retail market configurations and carbon policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Atashi Khoei, Arsham & Süral, Haldun & Tural, Mustafa Kemal, 2023. "Energy minimizing order picker forklift routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 604-626.
    8. Panitas Sureeyatanapas & Kanittha Yodprang & Viganda Varabuntoonvit, 2021. "Drivers, Barriers and Benefits of Product Carbon Footprinting: A State-of-the-Art Survey of Thai Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Nathalia Wolf & Pablo Escalona & Mónica López-Campos & Alejandro Angulo & Jorge Weston, 2023. "On Carbon Tax Effectiveness in Inducing a Clean Technology Transition: An Evaluation Based on Optimal Strategic Capacity Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Milad Mohammadi & Alibakhsh Nikzad, 2023. "Sustainable and reliable closed-loop supply chain network design during pandemic outbreaks and disruptions," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 969-991, June.
    11. Gaigné, C. & Hovelaque, V. & Mechouar, Y., 2020. "Carbon tax and sustainable facility location: The role of production technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. Hongtao Ren & Wenji Zhou & Hangzhou Wang & Bo Zhang & Tieju Ma, 2022. "An energy system optimization model accounting for the interrelations of multiple stochastic energy prices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 555-579, September.
    13. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Impact of carbon pricing policies on the cost and emission of the biomass supply chain: Optimization models and a case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Lia Nersesian & Ashkan Hafezalkotob & Raziyeh Reza-Gharehbagh, 2023. "Alternative governmental carbon policies on populations of green and non-green supply chains in a competitive market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4139-4172, May.
    15. Ruozhen Qiu & Shunpeng Shi & Yue Sun, 2019. "A p -Robust Green Supply Chain Network Design Model under Uncertain Carbon Price and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Yuki Kinoshita & Takaki Nagao & Hiromasa Ijuin & Keisuke Nagasawa & Tetsuo Yamada & Surendra M. Gupta, 2023. "Utilization of Free Trade Agreements to Minimize Costs and Carbon Emissions in the Global Supply Chain for Sustainable Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Bi-objective optimization of biomass supply chains considering carbon pricing policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. M. Boronoos & M. Mousazadeh & S. Ali Torabi, 2021. "A robust mixed flexible-possibilistic programming approach for multi-objective closed-loop green supply chain network design," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3368-3395, March.
    20. Qiang Du & Jiajie Zhou, 2022. "Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3150-:d:1372962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.