IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p3089-d1371933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Providing Feedback during the Online Phase of a Flipped Classroom Design: Fostering Sustainable Learning Performance While Considering Study Time Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoc Thuy Thi Thai

    (Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    School of Education, Can Tho University, Can Tho City 900000, Vietnam)

  • Bram De Wever

    (Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Martin Valcke

    (Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

This study concentrates on the effects of teacher feedback (FB) on students’ learning performance when students are tackling guiding questions (GQ) during the online session in a flipped classroom environment. Next to students’ performance, this research evaluates the sustainability in students’ self-efficacy beliefs and their appreciation of the feedback. Participants were second year college students ( n = 90) taking the “Environmental Technology” course at Can Tho College (Vietnam). They were assigned randomly to one of two research conditions: (1) with extra feedback (WEF, n = 45) and (2) no extra feedback (NEF, n = 45) during the online phase of the flipped classroom design. In both conditions, students spent the same amount of time in the online environment as well as in the face-to-face environment. The findings indicate that students studying in the WEF condition achieve higher learning outcomes as compared to students in the NEF condition. With respect to student variables, we observe no significant differences between the two research conditions in terms of self-efficacy beliefs at various occasions. However, we explore significant differences between the two research conditions in terms of feedback appreciation during the posttest assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoc Thuy Thi Thai & Bram De Wever & Martin Valcke, 2024. "Providing Feedback during the Online Phase of a Flipped Classroom Design: Fostering Sustainable Learning Performance While Considering Study Time Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3089-:d:1371933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anseel, Frederik & Lievens, Filip & Schollaert, Eveline, 2009. "Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 23-35, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christiane Hinerasky & Rene Fahr, 2014. "Learning Outcomes, Feedback, and the Performance Effects of a Training Program," Working Papers Dissertations 16, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    2. Maxim Egorov & Armin Pircher Verdorfer & Claudia Peus, 2019. "Taming the Emotional Dog: Moral Intuition and Ethically-Oriented Leader Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 817-834, December.
    3. Gérard Koenig & Isabelle Vandangeon-Derumez & Marie-Claire Marty & Yves Auroy & Jean-Paul Dumond, 2016. "Compliance with basic rules: the challenge of dialogical, enabling and disciplinary management [Le respect des règles élémentaires : enjeu d'un management dialogique, habilitant et disciplinant]," Post-Print hal-01377087, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3089-:d:1371933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.