IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2919-d1368082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Analyzing Co-Creation Value Chain Mechanisms in Community-Based Approaches: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Ohnishi

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Masahiro Osako

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Shogo Nakamura

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Takuya Togawa

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Kosuke Kawai

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Kaoru Suzuki

    (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan)

  • Aya Yoshida

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Kei Gomi

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

  • Takashi Tsuji

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan)

Abstract

Community co-creation is critical for tackling complex challenges and building a sustainable future, and necessitates collaboration between public and private sectors to co-create value chains. This paper highlights existing frameworks and proposes a heuristic approach that integrates Collective Impact (CI), Social Impact Assessment (SIA), and Community Capital (CC). Through a narrative review, the paper explores how SIA and CC can empower CI by aligning objective data with community context, ensuring solutions that resonate with local needs, promoting equity by fostering inclusive participation and understanding diverse perspectives, and revealing valuable resources within communities and leveraging their strengths for sustainable development. Although the paper delves into roles and responsibilities for each sector involved in co-creation, it acknowledges limitations in areas such as leadership-capacity building for effective collaboration and long-term commitment, impact measurement methodologies that capture nuanced social change over time, and inclusion of diverse participation methods to ensure all voices are heard and represented. By addressing these limitations, the paper calls for further research and development to strengthen community-driven social change.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Ohnishi & Masahiro Osako & Shogo Nakamura & Takuya Togawa & Kosuke Kawai & Kaoru Suzuki & Aya Yoshida & Kei Gomi & Takashi Tsuji, 2024. "A Framework for Analyzing Co-Creation Value Chain Mechanisms in Community-Based Approaches: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2919-:d:1368082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Eleonora Lisi, 2018. "Determinants and Performance Effects of Social Performance Measurement Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 225-251, September.
    2. Uzawa,Hirofumi, 2008. "Economic Analysis of Social Common Capital," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521066495.
    3. Nicholas Ind & Nick Coates & Katrina Lerman, 2020. "The gift of co-creation: what motivates customers to participate," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 181-194, March.
    4. Stefania Veltri & Antonella Silvestri, 2020. "The value relevance of corporate financial and nonfinancial information provided by the integrated report: A systematic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3038-3054, December.
    5. Norman Walzer & Liz Weaver & Catherine McGuire, 2016. "Collective impact approaches and community development issues," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 156-166, May.
    6. Liliana B. Andonova, 2010. "Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-53, May.
    7. Brian D. Christens & Paula Tran Inzeo, 2015. "Widening the view: situating collective impact among frameworks for community-led change," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 420-435, October.
    8. Bedggood, Rowan & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & McAndrew, Ryan & Glavas, Charmaine & Dulleck, Uwe, 2023. "Challenging the social-power paradigm: Moving beyond consumer empowerment to an energy ecosystem of shared value," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Helena Leino & Eeva Puumala, 2021. "What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 781-799, June.
    10. Tello, Mario A., 2020. "Conceptualizing social impact: A geographic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 562-571.
    11. Iriti, Jennifer & Page, Lindsay C. & Bickel, William E., 2018. "Place-based scholarships: Catalysts for systems reform to improve postsecondary attainment," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 137-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kimberly Pugel & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann & Shawn Peabody & Karl Linden, 2020. "Adapting Collaborative Approaches for Service Provision to Low-Income Countries: Expert Panel Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Pourjahanshahi, Fatemeh & Mollahosseini, Ali & Dehyadegari, Saeid, 2023. "Website quality and users' intention to use digital libraries: Examining users’ attitudes, online co-creation experiences, and eWOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    4. Halyna Mishenina & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2022. "Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan & Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    7. Roberto Scazzieri & Lilia Costabile, 2006. "Social Models, Growth and the International Monetary System: Implications for Europe and the United States," Working Papers wp117, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    8. Huihui Liu & Pim Martens, 2023. "Stakeholder Participation for Nature-Based Solutions: Inspiration for Rural Area’s Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2015. "Oscillations in a Growth Model with Endogenous Wealth, Resource, Housing, and Elastic Labour Supply," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(9), pages 458-472, September.
    10. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    11. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2017. "Growth with Endogenous Capital, Knowledge, and Renewable Resources," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(1), pages 19-37, March.
    12. Kenneth Abbott & Duncan Snidal, 2010. "International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 315-344, September.
    13. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    14. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Erin R. Graham, 2017. "Follow the Money: How Trends in Financing Are Changing Governance at International Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s5), pages 15-25, August.
    15. Hartarska, Valentina M. & Zhang, Jingfang & Nadolnyak, Denis A., 2023. "Scope Economies from Rural and Urban Microfinance Services," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335439, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Hiroshi Nishi & Kazuhiro Okuma, 2023. "Social common capital accumulation and fiscal sustainability in a wage-led growth economy," Working Papers PKWP2305, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    17. Haslam Alyson & Nesbit Rebecca & Christensen Robert K., 2019. "The Dynamic Impact of Nonprofit Organizations: Are Health-Related Nonprofit Organizations Associated with Improvements in Obesity at the Community Level?," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni, 2022. "Stakeholders' engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies' performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders' practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1488-1503, May.
    19. Zhang Wei-Bin, 2011. "Economic Growth And Dynamics Of Renewable Resource With Housing, Agricultural And Resource Land Use," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 151-174, August.
    20. Sanderink, Lisa & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, 2020. "How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2919-:d:1368082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.