IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1886-d1345670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion for Olive Oil Industry Effluents in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Manthos

    (Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering & Environmental Technology (LBEET), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 1 Karatheodori Str., University Campus, 26504 Patras, Greece
    Institute of Circular Economy and Environment (ICEE), University of Patras’ Research and Development Center, 26504 Patras, Greece)

  • Dimitris Zagklis

    (Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering & Environmental Technology (LBEET), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 1 Karatheodori Str., University Campus, 26504 Patras, Greece
    Institute of Circular Economy and Environment (ICEE), University of Patras’ Research and Development Center, 26504 Patras, Greece)

  • Constantina Zafiri

    (Green Technologies Ltd., 5 Ellinos Stratiotou Str., 26223 Patras, Greece)

  • Michael Kornaros

    (Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering & Environmental Technology (LBEET), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 1 Karatheodori Str., University Campus, 26504 Patras, Greece
    Institute of Circular Economy and Environment (ICEE), University of Patras’ Research and Development Center, 26504 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

Olive mill wastes are some of the most important waste streams in Mediterranean countries, such as Greece, and their uncontrolled disposal without treatment imposes serious environmental impacts. In the last few decades, the European Union has defined the framework for a sustainable circular economy, aiming for viable waste treatment solutions. Under this scope, anaerobic digestion could be a remarkable solution for efficiently reducing waste organic matter and producing green energy, at the same time. In this study, the economic sustainability of an anaerobic digestion unit for olive mill effluents was assessed. It was found that a centralized treatment plant that can process liquid olive mill effluents during the olive harvesting season and other agro-industrial by-products (such as fruit and vegetable waste) for the rest of the year could be a viable solution, with waste capacities of 780 m 3 OMW d −1 and 245 kg FVW d −1 . The internal rate of return was estimated at 6%, the net present value was estimated to be EUR 2 million, while the payback period was calculated to be 12 years. Furthermore, through the sensitivity analysis, the selling price of the electricity produced and the productivity of the waste processed in the plant alongside the olive mill wastewater were identified as the main factors affecting the viability of the process. The findings of this study can be applied in the development of a biomass-processing facility, taking into consideration the economic feasibility and the processing of challenging-to-treat wastes to generate green energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Manthos & Dimitris Zagklis & Constantina Zafiri & Michael Kornaros, 2024. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion for Olive Oil Industry Effluents in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1886-:d:1345670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cowley, Cortney & Brorsen, B. Wade, 2018. "Anaerobic Digester Production and Cost Functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 347-357.
    2. Tsigkou, Konstantina & Tsafrakidou, Panagiota & Kopsahelis, Alexandros & Zagklis, Dimitris & Zafiri, Constantina & Kornaros, Michael, 2020. "Used disposable nappies and expired food products valorisation through one- & two-stage anaerobic co-digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 610-619.
    3. Manthos, Georgios & Dareioti, Margarita & Zagklis, Dimitris & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Using biochemical methane potential results for the economic optimization of continuous anaerobic digestion systems: the effect of substrates’ synergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 296-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Das, Devashish & Kim, Sun Chang & Cho, Byung-Kwan & Kalia, Vipin Chandra & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2021. "Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Manthos, Georgios & Dareioti, Margarita & Zagklis, Dimitris & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Using biochemical methane potential results for the economic optimization of continuous anaerobic digestion systems: the effect of substrates’ synergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 296-306.
    4. Tsigkou, Konstantina & Tsafrakidou, Panagiota & Zagklis, Dimitris & Panagiotouros, Anastasios & Sionakidis, Dimitris & Zontos, Dimitris Marios & Zafiri, Constantina & Kornaros, Michael, 2021. "Used disposable nappies and expired food products co-digestion: A pilot-scale system assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 109-117.
    5. Vincenzo Torretta & Athanasia K. Tolkou & Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis & Francesca Maria Caccamo & Marco Carnevale Miino & Marco Baldi & Maria Cristina Collivignarelli, 2021. "Enhancement of Methanogenic Activity in Volumetrically Undersized Reactor by Mesophilic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Aqueous Residue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Margarita Andreas Dareioti & Aikaterini Ioannis Vavouraki & Konstantina Tsigkou & Michael Kornaros, 2021. "Assessment of Single- vs. Two-Stage Process for the Anaerobic Digestion of Liquid Cow Manure and Cheese Whey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Tsigkou, Konstantina & Sventzouri, Eirini & Zafiri, Constantina & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Digestate recirculation rate optimization for the enhancement of hydrogen production: The case of disposable nappies and fruit/vegetable waste valorization in a mesophilic two-stage anaerobic digestio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Benavidez, Justin R. & Thayer, Anastasia W. & Anderson, David P., 2019. "Poo Power: Revisiting Biogas Generation Potential on Dairy Farms in Texas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 682-700, November.
    9. Srisowmeya, G. & Chakravarthy, M. & Nandhini Devi, G., 2020. "Critical considerations in two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Octavio Fernández-Amador & Doris A. Oberdabernig & Patrick Tomberger, 2022. "Do methane emissions converge? Evidence from global panel data on production- and consumption-based emissions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 877-900, August.
    11. He, Ke & Ye, Lihong & Li, Fanlue & Chang, Huayi & Wang, Anbang & Luo, Sixuan & Zhang, Junbiao, 2022. "Using cognition and risk to explain the intention-behavior gap on bioenergy production: Based on machine learning logistic regression method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Tsigkou, Konstantina & Zagklis, Dimitris & Tsafrakidou, Panagiota & Zapanti, Paraskevi & Manthos, Georgios & Karamitou, Konstantina & Zafiri, Constantina & Kornaros, Michael, 2021. "Expired food products and used disposable adult nappies mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion: Biochemical methane potential, feedstock pretreatment and two-stage system performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 309-318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1886-:d:1345670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.