IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1058-d1326784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Carbon Emissions of Chinese Enterprises and Their Resource Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Tuan Pan

    (School of Finance, Hefei University of Economics, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Juan Zhang

    (School of Finance, Hefei University of Economics, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Yan Wang

    (School of Finance, Hefei University of Economics, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Yuping Shang

    (School of Economics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

At present, net-zero emissions have become a widely accepted goal globally. For a giant carbon emitter like China, especially after just experiencing a high-energy consumption, high-emission, and low-efficiency extensive economic model, achieving the global net-zero emissions target by the middle of this century is particularly important. The implementation of environmental regulation policies is one of the inevitable choices for achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Existing theoretical analysis shows that environmental regulation acts on pollution emissions through cost effects and technological innovation, but relevant studies mostly focus on macro effects and ignore the impact of enterprise heterogeneity. This study calculates the carbon emission data of listed enterprises in China from 2012 to 2021 and examines the impact of environmental regulation policies on the carbon emission intensity of enterprises and its transmission mechanism from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. At the same time, the heterogeneity effect of resource-based industry and non-resource-based industry is considered. The research results show that China’s environmental supervision has been increasing year by year, which can reduce the carbon emission intensity of enterprises by improving the level of environmental disclosure of enterprises, environmental management concepts, and resource allocation efficiency and accelerating the establishment of environmental systems of enterprises, but the effect of technological innovation has not been highlighted. Further heterogeneity also indicates that environmental regulation is more conducive to reducing the carbon emission intensity of non-resource-based enterprises, small enterprises, and non-state-owned enterprises. The conclusions of this paper provide a precise direction for the implementation of environmental regulation policies in China and the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuan Pan & Juan Zhang & Yan Wang & Yuping Shang, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Carbon Emissions of Chinese Enterprises and Their Resource Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1058-:d:1326784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Zhao & Kahn, Matthew E. & Liu, Yu & Wang, Zhi, 2018. "The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 468-485.
    2. Hamaguchi, Yoshihiro, 2023. "Environmental tax evasion as a determinant of the Porter and pollution haven hypotheses in a corrupt political system," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 610-633.
    3. Larelle Chapple & Peter M. Clarkson & Daniel L. Gold, 2013. "The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme ( ETS )," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(1), pages 1-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    3. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Riccardo Macchioni & Annamaria Zampella, 2018. "Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1031-1056, May.
    4. Ning Zhang & Ying Mao, 2021. "Spatial Effects of Environmental Pollution on Healthcare Services: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Evangeline O. Elijido-Ten & Peter Clarkson, 2019. "Going Beyond Climate Change Risk Management: Insights from the World’s Largest Most Sustainable Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1067-1089, July.
    6. Stefan Lewandowski, 2017. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1196-1211, December.
    7. Eunsoo Kim, 2024. "The Relationship between the Greenhouse Gas and Energy Target Management System and Foreign Ownership: Investor Sensitivity to the Implementation of the System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Sedakov, Artem & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "A model of river pollution as a dynamic game with network externalities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1136-1153.
    9. Yanyun Li & Faqin Lin & Wenxiao Wang, 2022. "Environmental regulation and inward foreign direct investment: Evidence from the eleventh Five‐Year Plan in China," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 684-707, July.
    10. Mathilde Maurel & Thomas Pernet & Zhao Ruili, 2019. "Financial Dependencies, Environmental Regulation and Pollution Intensity: Evidence From China," Post-Print halshs-02423350, HAL.
    11. Jie, Guo & Jiahui, Lv, 2023. "Media attention, green technology innovation and industrial enterprises’ sustainable development: The moderating effect of environmental regulation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 873-889.
    12. Cheng, Chen & Li, Siming & Liu, Shali & Zhang, Suge, 2022. "Origin matters: The institution imprint effect and green innovation in family businesses," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Frank Hartmann & Paolo Perego & Anna Young, 2013. "Carbon Accounting: Challenges for Research in Management Control and Performance Measurement," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 539-563, December.
    14. Tantawy Moussa & Amir Allam & Said Elbanna & Ahmed Bani‐Mustafa, 2020. "Can board environmental orientation improve U.S. firms' carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 72-86, January.
    15. Du, Kerui & Liu, Xueyue & Zhao, Cheng, 2023. "Environmental regulation mitigates energy rebound effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Dean Katselas & Baljit K. Sidhu & Chuan Yu & Tom Smith, 2016. "Merging time-series Australian data across databases: challenges and solutions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(4), pages 1071-1095, December.
    17. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Pan, Zixuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin, 2020. "Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-129.
    18. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Dong, Yan & Tian, Jinhuan & Wen, Qiang, 2022. "Environmental regulation and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Mao, Jie & Wang, Chunhua & Yin, Haitao, 2023. "Corporate responses to air quality regulation: Evidence from a regional environmental policy in China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1058-:d:1326784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.