IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7070-d1130780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Neutrality Potential of Textile Products Made from Plant-Derived Fibers

Author

Listed:
  • Junran Liu

    (School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Shuyi Liu

    (School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Lisha Zhu

    (College of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Lirong Sun

    (Office for Social Responsibility of China National Textile and Apparel Council, Beijing 100027, China)

  • Ying Zhang

    (School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Xin Li

    (School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Laili Wang

    (School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Zhejiang Provincial Innovation Center of Advanced Textile Technology, Shaoxing 312000, China
    Zhejiang Academy of Ecological Civilization, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Clothing Engineering Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

During the growth of biomass, there are two carbon storage paths for plant-derived fibers. One path is to assimilate carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the atmosphere through photosynthesis and temporarily store it in textile plants. Besides, the carbon can be captured and stored in soil. The carbon storage capacity of textile products made from plant-derived fibers such as cotton, flax, hemp, kenaf and bamboo fiber, etc., is a non-negligible part of greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting and reporting. However, there is a lack of systematic methods to evaluate carbon storage and the delayed emission effect of plant-derived fibers. In this study, the carbon storage and emission times of 100% hemp T-shirt, 100% hemp slipcover, and 100% hemp fiber handicraft were evaluated by using the soil organic carbon method, dry weight biomass method, and modeling method. The results revealed that the CO 2 storage of 1 kg hemp fiber is 1.833 kg. Meanwhile, the delayed emission effects of carbon temporarily stored in the 3 kinds of hemp fiber products are 3.83%, 19.68%, and 41.12% at different lifespans (i.e., 5, 25, or 50 years), in which case the landfill option for hemp fiber products may be preferable from carbon storage effect perspective. The results suggest that plant-derived fibers have a positive impact on climate change due to CO 2 storage, and that the carbon storage effect improves with the continued lifespan of the product. By quantifying carbon storage and the delayed emission effect of plant-derived fibers, it is beneficial to understand the potential for reducing carbon emissions, which in turn helps to promote and develop more environmentally friendly and low-carbon production processes and products.

Suggested Citation

  • Junran Liu & Shuyi Liu & Lisha Zhu & Lirong Sun & Ying Zhang & Xin Li & Laili Wang, 2023. "Carbon Neutrality Potential of Textile Products Made from Plant-Derived Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7070-:d:1130780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7070/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7070/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulio Lazzerini & Jacopo Manzini & Stefano Lucchetti & Stefania Nin & Francesco Paolo Nicese, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Sequestration from Conventional and Organic Olive Tree Nurseries in Tuscany, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Luca Di Paolo & Simona Abbate & Eliseo Celani & Davide Di Battista & Giovanni Candeloro, 2022. "Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Plastic Items and Their Substitution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Liping Li & Guiyue Du & Beibei Yan & Yuan Wang & Yingxin Zhao & Jianming Su & Hongyi Li & Yanfeng Du & Yunan Sun & Guanyi Chen & Wanqing Li & Thomas Helmer Pedersen, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Analysis of Sewage Sludge Thermochemical Conversion Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Lelia Lawson & Lauren M. Degenstein & Bronwyn Bates & Wade Chute & Dan King & Patricia I. Dolez, 2022. "Cellulose Textiles from Hemp Biomass: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Miko Kirschbaum, 2006. "Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1151-1164, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Damon Matthews & Kirsten Zickfeld & Alexander Koch & Amy Luers, 2023. "Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Virin Kittithammavong & Wilawan Khanitchaidecha & Pajaree Thongsanit, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions from Plastic Consumption Behaviors in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Ajani, Judith I. & Keith, Heather & Blakers, Margaret & Mackey, Brendan G. & King, Helen P., 2013. "Comprehensive carbon stock and flow accounting: A national framework to support climate change mitigation policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 61-72.
    4. Parisa, Zack & Marland, Eric & Sohngen, Brent & Marland, Gregg & Jenkins, Jennifer, 2022. "The time value of carbon storage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Marshall, Liz & Kelly, Alexia, 2010. "The Time Value of Carbon and Carbon Storage: Clarifying the terms and the policy implications of the debate," MPRA Paper 27326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Feng, Jing-Chun & Sun, Liwei & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Carbon sequestration via shellfish farming: A potential negative emissions technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Wan-Yu Liu & Qunwei Wang, 2016. "Optimal pricing of the Taiwan carbon trading market based on a demand–supply model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 209-242, November.
    8. Paschen, Marius & Meier, Felix & Rickels, Wilfried, 2022. "Accounting for terrestrial and marine carbon sink enhancement," Kiel Working Papers 2204, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), revised 2022.
    9. Annie Levasseur & Pascal Lesage & Manuele Margni & Miguel Brandão & Réjean Samson, 2012. "Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 759-776, December.
    10. Güssow, Kerstin & Proelss, Alexander & Oschlies, Andreas & Rehdanz, Katrin & Rickels, Wilfried, 2010. "Ocean iron fertilization: Why further research is needed," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 911-918, September.
    11. Charles Breton & Pierre Blanchet & Ben Amor & Robert Beauregard & Wen-Shao Chang, 2018. "Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Philip Fearnside, 2009. "Carbon benefits from Amazonian forest reserves: leakage accounting and the value of time," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 557-567, August.
    13. Cherubini, Francesco & Strømman, Anders H. & Hertwich, Edgar, 2011. "Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO2 emissions from bioenergy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 59-66.
    14. Kurniawati, 2023. "Sustainable Textile Practices by Integrated Viscose Rayon and Yarn Producers: An Empirical Study," GATR Journals jfbr210, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Rickels, Wilfried & Rehdanz, Katrin & Oschlies, Andreas, 2010. "Methods for greenhouse gas offset accounting: A case study of ocean iron fertilization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2495-2509, October.
    16. Rickels, Wilfried & Rehdanz, Katrin & Oschlies, Andreas, 2009. "Accounting aspects of ocean iron fertilization," Kiel Working Papers 1572, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7070-:d:1130780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.