IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p7006-d1129574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Effective Factors in Achieving Ecological City in the Direction of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Liansheng Hu

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Department of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University Zhicheng College, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yongqin Xi

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

Diverse ways have been presented for achieving urban balance and sustainability. The ecological city is one of these approaches. Consequently, the primary objective of this study is to identify and assess the effective variables in attaining an ecological city in the direction of sustainable development in the city of Jingzhou. Separating the effective criteria and variables for creating the ecological city and comparing the perspectives of professionals and citizens regarding the priority of these factors are additional objectives of this study. The current study has an applied objective and a descriptive data gathering strategy. In this study, a two-part questionnaire was developed in which Friedman’s test was used to prioritize the effective criteria for attaining an ecological city from the people’ perspective. The Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to prioritize the aforementioned variables from the experts’ perspective. The statistical population of the study consists of residents of the city of Jingzhou. A total of 384 individuals were selected as the sample. The analysis of data was performed using SPSS statistical software. According to the results, there is no substantial difference in ways in which residents and specialists prioritize the effective components for building an ecological city. Except for the sub-factors of the “physical” section (where the priorities are completely different among the groups) and the two “environmental” sections (where the priorities of the two groups are slightly different), the priority of the sub-factors is the same in the remaining sections from the perspective of both groups. According to the findings of this study, “independent and self-sufficient local economy” and “use of renewable energy” are the most beneficial components for creating an ecological city from the perspective of both inhabitants and professionals. In addition, among the indicators of Jingzhou city, the economic index is in a better position for the city to be ecological.

Suggested Citation

  • Liansheng Hu & Yongqin Xi, 2023. "Evaluation of Effective Factors in Achieving Ecological City in the Direction of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7006-:d:1129574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu Deng & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Yuanli Ma & Zhen Peng, 2021. "Promoting sustainability through governance of eco-city indicators: a multi-spatial perspective [Measuring urban sustainability]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 61-72.
    2. Geoff Boeing & Carl Higgs & Shiqin Liu & Billie Giles-Corti & James F Sallis & Ester Cerin & Melanie Lowe & Deepti Adlakha & Erica Hinckson & Anne Vernez Moudon & Deborah Salvo & Marc A Adams & Ligia , 2022. "Using Open Data and Open-Source Software to Develop Spatial Indicators of Urban Design and Transport Features for Achieving Healthy and Sustainable Cities," Papers 2205.05240, arXiv.org.
    3. Yu, Binbin, 2021. "Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. I-Chun Catherine Chang & Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2016. "A Green Leap Forward? Eco-State Restructuring and the Tianjin-Binhai Eco-City Model," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 929-943, June.
    5. Zsuzsanna Tomor & Albert Meijer & Ank Michels & Stan Geertman, 2019. "Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 3-27, October.
    6. Asanga Gunawansa, 2011. "Contractual and policy challenges to developing ecocities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 382-390, November.
    7. Marta Bottero & Caterina Caprioli & Giancarlo Cotella & Marco Santangelo, 2019. "Sustainable Cities: A Reflection on Potentialities and Limits based on Existing Eco-Districts in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changjie Zhan & Martin De Jong, 2017. "Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What Lessons Can Be Drawn for Other Large-Scale Sustainable City-Projects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Wang, Jianxiao & An, Qi & Zhao, Yue & Pan, Guangsheng & Song, Jie & Hu, Qinran & Tan, Chin-Woo, 2023. "Role of electrolytic hydrogen in smart city decarbonization in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Shaoyang Ren & Yinan Li & Zhen Peng & Mingqiang Yin & Xiao Liu, 2024. "Developing an Urban Environment Examination System by Incorporating Construction, Economic, Environmental, Cultural and Development Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    4. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    5. Federica Rotondo & Francesca Abastante & Giancarlo Cotella & Isabella Maria Lami, 2020. "Questioning Low-Carbon Transition Governance: A Comparative Analysis of European Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Eirini Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Zabaniotou, 2022. "From Theory to Praxis: ‘Go Sustainable Living’ Survey for Exploring Individuals Consciousness Level of Decision-Making and Action-Taking in Daily Life Towards a Green Citizenship," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Shao, Jun & Wang, Lianghu, 2023. "Can new-type urbanization improve the green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    8. Chien, FengSheng & Paramaiah, Ch & joseph, Robinson & Pham, Hong Chuong & Phan, Thi Thu Hien & Ngo, Thanh Quang, 2023. "The impact of eco-innovation, trade openness, financial development, green energy and government governance on sustainable development in ASEAN countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    9. Rebekka Volk & Mihir Rambhia & Elias Naber & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Jinlong Chen & Zhonglei Yu & Mengxia Li & Xiao Huang, 2023. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Coverage in Urban Built-Up Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Bin Liao, 2024. "Does New Urbanization Promote Urban Metabolic Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Ziyong Su & Zhanqi Wang & Liguo Zhang, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Values of Watershed and Ecological Compensation Scheme Considering Its Realization in Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Daxue Kan & Wenqing Yao & Xia Liu & Lianju Lyu & Weichiao Huang, 2023. "Study on the Coordination of New Urbanization and Water Ecological Civilization and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Cheng, Zhonghua & Wang, Lan, 2023. "Can new urbanization improve urban total-factor energy efficiency in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    15. Paraskevas Nikolaou & Socrates Basbas, 2023. "Urban Development and Transportation: Investigating Spatial Performance Indicators of 12 European Union Coastal Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Cristina Viano & Sowelu Avanzo & Monica Cerutti & Alex Cordero & Claudio Schifanella & Guido Boella, 2022. "Blockchain tools for socio-economic interactions in local communities [Blockchain-based smart contracts: A systematic mapping study]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 373-385.
    17. Xu, Feng & Chi, Guangqing & Zhang, Zhexi & Yang, Jianxin, 2023. "How does quality regional growth affect land resources dependence in China? Evidence based on spatial Durbin panel models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Qiangyi Li & Lan Yang & Fangxin Jiang & Yangqing Liu & Chenyang Guo & Shuya Han, 2022. "Distribution Characteristics, Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of the Water-Energy-Land-Food Nexus: A Case Study of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Tianqi Zhang & Yue Zhou & Ming Li & Haoran Zhang & Tong Wang & Yu Tian, 2022. "Impacts of Urbanization on Drainage System Health and Sustainable Drainage Recommendations for Future Scenarios—A Small City Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Zhao, Ting & Yang, Zhenshan, 2017. "Towards green growth and management: Relative efficiency and gaps of Chinese cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 481-494.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7006-:d:1129574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.