IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6883-d1127545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology for Predicting Ground Delay Program Incidence through Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangning Dong

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China
    National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Xuhao Zhu

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China
    National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Minghua Hu

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China
    National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Jie Bao

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China
    National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 29 General Avenue, Nanjing 211106, China)

Abstract

Effective ground delay programs (GDP) are needed to intervene when there are bad weather or airport capacity issues. This paper proposes a new methodology for predicting the incidence of effective ground delay programs by utilizing machine learning techniques, which can improve the safety and economic benefits of flights. We use the combination of local weather and flight operation data along with the ATM airport performance (ATMAP) algorithm to quantify the weather and to generate an ATMAP score. We then compared the accuracy of three machine learning models, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and XGBoost, to estimate the probability of GDPs. The results of the weather analysis, performed by the ATMAP algorithm, indicated that the ceiling was the most critical weather factor. Lastly, we used two linear regression models (ridge and LASSO) and a non-linear regression model (decision tree) to predict departure flight delays during GDP. The predictive accuracy of the regression models was enhanced by an increase in ATMAP scores, with the decision tree model outperforming the other models, resulting in an improvement of 8.8% in its correlation coefficient ( R 2 ).

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangning Dong & Xuhao Zhu & Minghua Hu & Jie Bao, 2023. "A Methodology for Predicting Ground Delay Program Incidence through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6883-:d:1127545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram & Leonardo Goliatt & Ozgur Kisi & Slavisa Trajkovic & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2022. "Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Improving Machine Learning Approaches in Streamflow Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Avijit Mukherjee & Mark Hansen, 2007. "A Dynamic Stochastic Model for the Single Airport Ground Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 444-456, November.
    3. Michael O. Ball & Robert Hoffman & Amedeo R. Odoni & Ryan Rifkin, 2003. "A Stochastic Integer Program with Dual Network Structure and Its Application to the Ground-Holding Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 167-171, February.
    4. Michael O. Ball & Robert Hoffman & Avijit Mukherjee, 2010. "Ground Delay Program Planning Under Uncertainty Based on the Ration-by-Distance Principle," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Liu, Yulin & Liu, Yi & Hansen, Mark & Pozdnukhov, Alexey & Zhang, Danqing, 2019. "Using machine learning to analyze air traffic management actions: Ground delay program case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 80-95.
    6. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Michael O. Ball, 2006. "Slot Trading Opportunities in Collaborative Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 29-43, February.
    7. Manze Guo & Zhenzhou Yuan & Bruce Janson & Yongxin Peng & Yang Yang & Wencheng Wang, 2021. "Older Pedestrian Traffic Crashes Severity Analysis Based on an Emerging Machine Learning XGBoost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Aya Hasan AlKhereibi & Tadesse G. Wakjira & Murat Kucukvar & Nuri C. Onat, 2023. "Predictive Machine Learning Algorithms for Metro Ridership Based on Urban Land Use Policies in Support of Transit-Oriented Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar, 2021. "Airport capacity management: A review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Yi Liu & Mark Hansen, 2016. "Incorporating Predictability Into Cost Optimization for Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 132-149, February.
    3. Michael O. Ball & Robert Hoffman & Avijit Mukherjee, 2010. "Ground Delay Program Planning Under Uncertainty Based on the Ration-by-Distance Principle," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Avijit Mukherjee & Mark Hansen & Shon Grabbe, 2012. "Ground delay program planning under uncertainty in airport capacity," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 611-628, June.
    5. Liu, Yulin & Liu, Yi & Hansen, Mark & Pozdnukhov, Alexey & Zhang, Danqing, 2019. "Using machine learning to analyze air traffic management actions: Ground delay program case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 80-95.
    6. Alexander S. Estes & Michael O. Ball, 2021. "Monge Properties, Optimal Greedy Policies, and Policy Improvement for the Dynamic Stochastic Transportation Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 785-807, May.
    7. Mukherjee, Avijit & Hansen, Mark, 2009. "A dynamic rerouting model for air traffic flow management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 159-171, January.
    8. Alexander Estes & David J. Lovell & Michael O. Ball, 2019. "Unsupervised prototype reduction for data exploration and an application to air traffic management initiatives," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 467-510, December.
    9. Alexander S. Estes & Michael O. Ball, 2020. "Equity and Strength in Stochastic Integer Programming Models for the Dynamic Single Airport Ground-Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 944-955, July.
    10. Guo, Yechenfeng & Hu, Minghua & Zou, Bo & Hansen, Mark & Zhang, Ying & Xie, Hua, 2022. "Air Traffic Flow Management Integrating Separation Management and Ground Holding: An Efficiency-Equity Bi-objective Perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 394-423.
    11. Liu, Pei-chen Barry & Hansen, Mark & Mukherjee, Avijit, 2008. "Scenario-based air traffic flow management: From theory to practice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 685-702, August.
    12. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    13. Murça, Mayara Condé Rocha, 2018. "Collaborative air traffic flow management: Incorporating airline preferences in rerouting decisions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 97-107.
    14. Andreatta, Giovanni & Dell'Olmo, Paolo & Lulli, Guglielmo, 2011. "An aggregate stochastic programming model for air traffic flow management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 697-704, December.
    15. Zhang, Yu, 2008. "Real-time Inter-modal Strategies for Airline Schedule Perturbation Recovery and Airport Congestion Mitigation under Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2k44c9tx, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Woo, Young-Bin & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "Scenario-based stochastic programming for an airline-driven flight rescheduling problem under ground delay programs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Chunzheng Wang & Minghua Hu & Lei Yang & Zheng Zhao, 2021. "Prediction of air traffic delays: An agent-based model introducing refined parameter estimation methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Schummer, James & Abizada, Azar, 2017. "Incentives in landing slot problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 29-55.
    19. Sun, D. & Clinet, A. & Bayen, A.M., 2011. "A dual decomposition method for sector capacity constrained traffic flow optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 880-902, July.
    20. Samà, Marcella & D’Ariano, Andrea & D’Ariano, Paolo & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2017. "Scheduling models for optimal aircraft traffic control at busy airports: Tardiness, priorities, equity and violations considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 81-98.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6883-:d:1127545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.