IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5620-d1104978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Poultry Waste-to-Wealth: Technological Progress, Modeling and Simulation Studies, and Economic- Environmental and Social Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Long Zhang

    (School of Business, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

  • Jingzheng Ren

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnical University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Wuliyasu Bai

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China)

Abstract

The poultry industry has met more than one-third of the human demand for meat and all the demand for eggs during the past several decades, and it has also been recognized as a very efficient sector in the livestock industry. However, increasing poultry production has also led to the massive generation of various poultry wastes, which are a great threat to climate change, environmental safety, and human health. Traditionally, landfilling and burning are the most frequently used techniques for treating poultry waste. With rich contents of organic matter, nutrients, and keratin, poultry waste can be applied to produce value-added products that can be used in many sectors by using a variety of emerging technological processes. Considering the massive generation, profound environmental pollution, and wide range of applications of poultry waste, this paper categorizes poultry waste as litter and manure waste, feather waste, mortality waste, abattoir waste, and hatchery waste. This paper also reviews modeling and simulation studies on poultry waste-to-wealth, and six current or emerging technological processes for poultry waste-to-wealth are described: anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, gasification, hydrolysis, enzymatic treatment, and microbial conversion. Finally, the economic, environmental, and social impacts of the sector of poultry waste-to-wealth are discussed. For further research, we suggest a focus on the poultry waste-to-wealth projects in different regions, the behavior strategy of different stakeholders, and policymaking for the commercialized application of poultry waste-to-wealth technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Long Zhang & Jingzheng Ren & Wuliyasu Bai, 2023. "A Review of Poultry Waste-to-Wealth: Technological Progress, Modeling and Simulation Studies, and Economic- Environmental and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5620-:d:1104978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ru-Jin Huang & Yanlin Zhang & Carlo Bozzetti & Kin-Fai Ho & Jun-Ji Cao & Yongming Han & Kaspar R. Daellenbach & Jay G. Slowik & Stephen M. Platt & Francesco Canonaco & Peter Zotter & Robert Wolf & Sim, 2014. "High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7521), pages 218-222, October.
    2. Mario Herrero & Benjamin Henderson & Petr Havlík & Philip K. Thornton & Richard T. Conant & Pete Smith & Stefan Wirsenius & Alexander N. Hristov & Pierre Gerber & Margaret Gill & Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, 2016. "Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 452-461, May.
    3. Hameed, Zeeshan & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Zakir & Maqsood, Khuram & Atabani, A.E. & Ghauri, Moinuddin & Khurram, Muhammad Shahzad & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2021. "Gasification of municipal solid waste blends with biomass for energy production and resources recovery: Current status, hybrid technologies and innovative prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Christopoulou, Nicholetta & Goumenaki, Maria, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production from olive-oil mill wastewater, by codigesting with diluted poultry-manure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(6), pages 646-663, June.
    5. Yurdakul, Sema, 2016. "Determination of co-combustion properties and thermal kinetics of poultry litter/coal blends using thermogravimetry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 215-223.
    6. Andrzej Cezary Żołnowski & Tadeusz Bakuła & Elżbieta Rolka & Andrzej Klasa, 2022. "Effect of Mineral–Microbial Deodorizing Preparation on the Value of Poultry Manure as Soil Amendment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    8. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Zhang, Long & Bai, Wuliyasu, 2021. "Sustainability of crop–based biodiesel for transportation in China: Barrier analysis and life cycle ecological footprint calculations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Guiyan Zang & Jianan Zhang & Junxi Jia & Nathaniel Weger & Albert Ratner, 2019. "Clean Poultry Energy System Design Based on Biomass Gasification Technology: Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Tańczuk, M. & Junga, R. & Werle, S. & Chabiński, M. & Ziółkowski, Ł., 2019. "Experimental analysis of the fixed bed gasification process of the mixtures of the chicken manure with biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1055-1063.
    12. Phil Glatz & Zhihong Miao & Belinda Rodda, 2011. "Handling and Treatment of Poultry Hatchery Waste: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Akintayo Oluremi & Quainoo Jemimah, 2016. "Management of waste by-products in medium-scale commercial poultry facilities in peri-urban Ibadan, Nigeria," Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, CyberLeninka;Редакция журнала Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, vol. 53(5), pages 103-107.
    14. Guo, Xiang & Zhang, Yanbin & Guo, Qianqian & Zhang, Rui & Wang, Caiyu & Yan, Beibei & Lin, Fawei & Chen, Guanyi & Hou, Li'an, 2021. "Evaluation on energetic and economic benefits of the coupling anaerobic digestion and gasification from agricultural wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 494-503.
    15. Huang, Y. & Anderson, M. & McIlveen-Wright, D. & Lyons, G.A. & McRoberts, W.C. & Wang, Y.D. & Roskilly, A.P. & Hewitt, N.J., 2015. "Biochar and renewable energy generation from poultry litter waste: A technical and economic analysis based on computational simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 656-663.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariusz Tańczuk & Robert Junga & Alicja Kolasa-Więcek & Patrycja Niemiec, 2019. "Assessment of the Energy Potential of Chicken Manure in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Wojciech Rzeźnik & Ilona Rzeźnik & Paulina Mielcarek-Bocheńska & Mateusz Urbański, 2023. "Air Pollutants Emission during Co-Combustion of Animal Manure and Wood Pellets in 15 kW Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Shi, Wenxiao & Lin, Chen & Chen, Wei & Hong, Jinglan & Chang, Jingcai & Dong, Yong & Zhang, Yanlu, 2017. "Environmental effect of current desulfurization technology on fly dust emission in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Yi Yang & Jie Li & Guobin Zhu & Qiangqiang Yuan, 2019. "Spatio–Temporal Relationship and Evolvement of Socioeconomic Factors and PM 2.5 in China During 1998–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Li, Fenghai & Zhao, Chaoyue & Guo, Qianqian & Li, Yang & Fan, Hongli & Guo, Mingxi & Wu, Lishun & Huang, Jiejie & Fang, Yitian, 2020. "Exploration in ash-deposition (AD) behavior modification of low-rank coal by manure addition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    7. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Jinyang Tang & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Yu Zhang & Jiayu Wu & Chunyao Zhou & Qingyu Zhang, 2019. "Installation Planning in Regional Thermal Power Industry for Emissions Reduction Based on an Emissions Inventory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    11. Helen Harwatt & Joan Sabaté & Gidon Eshel & Sam Soret & William Ripple, 2017. "Substituting beans for beef as a contribution toward US climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 261-270, July.
    12. Šuhaj, Patrik & Husár, Jakub & Haydary, Juma & Annus, Július, 2022. "Experimental verification of a pilot pyrolysis/split product gasification (PSPG) unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    13. Elżbieta Rolka & Andrzej Cezary Żołnowski & Mirosław Wyszkowski & Weronika Zych & Anna Skorwider-Namiotko, 2023. "Wood Biomass Ash (WBA) from the Heat Production Process as a Mineral Amendment for Improving Selected Soil Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Ruiqing Ma & Yeyue Zhang & Yini Zhang & Xi Li & Zheng Ji, 2023. "The Relationship between the Transmission of Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains and Air Quality: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Li, Jiawei & Fan, Subo & Zhang, Xuyang & Chen, Zhichao & Qiao, Yanyu & Yuan, Zhenhua & Zeng, Lingyan & Li, Zhengqi, 2022. "Physicochemical structure, combustion characteristics and SiO2 properties of entrained flow gasification ash," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    16. Ozdemir, Saim & Şimşek, Aslı & Ozdemir, Serkan & Dede, Cemile, 2022. "Investigation of poultry slaughterhouse waste stream to produce bio-fuel for internal utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 274-282.
    17. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Marcin Sajdak & Artur Majewski & Francesca Di Gruttola & Grzegorz Gałko & Edyta Misztal & Michał Rejdak & Andreas Hornung & Miloud Ouadi, 2023. "Evaluation of the Feasibility of Using TCR-Derived Chars from Selected Biomass Wastes and MSW Fractions in CO 2 Sequestration on Degraded and Post-Industrial Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Tang, Kai & He, Chuantian & Ma, Chunbo & Wang, Dong, 2019. "Does carbon farming provide a cost-effective option to mitigate GHG emissions? Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.
    20. Yang Ou & Christopher Roney & Jameel Alsalam & Katherine Calvin & Jared Creason & Jae Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Page Kyle & Kanishka Narayan & Patrick O’Rourke & Pralit Patel & Shaun Ragnauth & Ste, 2021. "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5620-:d:1104978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.