IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5595-d1104447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Nomination Committee Members—Stakeholders’ Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hildur Magnusdottir

    (Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Audur Arna Arnardottir

    (School of Business, Reykjavik University, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson

    (Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
    Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Abstract

Sustainability is a critical issue for businesses today, and corporate boards and nomination committees play a vital role in promoting sustainable practices within organizations. Nomination Committees (NCs) have become important mechanisms for what has been coined as good or sustainable governance. Stakeholders, however, have different opinions on the merits of these committees. Amongst other things, there is disagreement about whom to select for NCs and the criteria for selection. The composition of NCs can influence board nominations and determine whether the necessary knowledge and skills reside within a board to deal with sustainability and good corporate governance. The aim of this research is to provide insights into stakeholders’ perspectives on what matters when profiling nomination committees’ members. The literature on NCs is underdeveloped, and this research importantly addresses the issue by interviewing 13 individuals who are either shareholders, board members of listed companies, or members of NCs. Additionally, a questionnaire was sent to shareholders, board members, and NC members of the 300 largest companies in Iceland. A total of 138 responses were received. The results show that stakeholders believe it is important to decide upon an NC’s composition prior to electing its members. NC members should have either management or board membership experience. Diversity within the committees is also seen to be important, as it can influence diversity and inclusion overall at the board level. These research results provide important insights and understanding for shareholders and boards of directors when composing nomination committees.

Suggested Citation

  • Hildur Magnusdottir & Audur Arna Arnardottir & Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, 2023. "Selecting Nomination Committee Members—Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5595-:d:1104447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf H. Carlsson, 2007. "Swedish Corporate Governance and Value Creation: owners still in the driver's seat," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1038-1055, November.
    2. Richard Clune & Dana R. Hermanson & James G. Tompkins & Zhongxia (Shelly) Ye, 2014. "The Nominating Committee Process: A Qualitative Examination of Board Independence and Formalization," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 748-786, September.
    3. Elizabeth Carson, 2002. "Factors Associated with the Development of Board Sub–committees," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 4-18, January.
    4. Adams, Renée B. & Ragunathan, Vanitha & Tumarkin, Robert, 2021. "Death by committee? An analysis of corporate board (sub-) committees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1119-1146.
    5. Winfried Ruigrok & Simon Peck & Sabina Tacheva & Peder Greve & Yan Hu, 2006. "The Determinants and Effects of Board Nomination Committees," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 10(2), pages 119-148, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, 2019. "What have we learnt about board gender diversity as a business strategy? The appointment of board subcommittees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 301-315, February.
    2. Polovina, Nereida & Peasnell, Ken, 2020. "Do minority acquisitions transfer better corporate governance practices? An analysis of UK's cross-border minority investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    3. Walther, Axel & Morner, Michèle & Calabrò, Andrea, 2017. "The role of behaviorally integrated nominating committees in non-executive director selection processes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 351-361.
    4. Tao, Ngoc Bich & Hutchinson, Marion, 2013. "Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 83-99.
    5. Nava Subramaniam & Lisa McManus & Jiani Zhang, 2009. "Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(4), pages 316-339, April.
    6. Sara Diogo & Teresa Carvalho & Zélia Breda, 2021. "Nomination vs. election: do they influence women’s access to institutional decision-making bodies?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 879-898, September.
    7. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, June.
    8. Lee, Wei-Ming, 2020. "The determinants and effects of board committees," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Gregoric, Aleksandra & Oxelheim, Lars & Randøy, Trond & Thomsen, Steen, 2013. "Changing the Corporate Elite? Not So Easy. Female Directors’ Appointments onto Corporate Boards," Working Paper Series 978, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    10. Szymon Sacher & Laura Battaglia & Stephen Hansen, 2021. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Regression with High-Dimensional Categorical Data," Papers 2107.08112, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    11. Reggy Hooghiemstra & Jaap Manen, 2004. "Non-executive directors in the Netherlands: another expectations gap?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 25-41.
    12. Wei Wei & Yulia Muratova, 2022. "Executive power and politically connected independent directors: evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Chrysoula Morfi & Jerker Nilsson & Karin Hakelius & Kostas Karantininis, 2021. "Social networks and member participation in cooperative governance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 264-285, April.
    14. Gerhard Schnyder, 2008. "Revisiting the Party Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Evidence from Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands," Working Papers wp372, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    15. Szymon Kaczmarek & Winfried Ruigrok, 2013. "In at the Deep End of Firm Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 513-534, August.
    16. Showkat Ahmad Busru & G. Shanmugasundaram & Shariq Ahmad Bhat, 2020. "Corporate Governance an Imperative for Stakeholders Protection: Evidence from Risk Management of Indian Listed Firms," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 89-116, July.
    17. Karin Jonnergård & Anna Stafsudd, 2011. "The making of active boards in Swedish public companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(1), pages 123-155, February.
    18. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    19. Ilduara Busta & Bersant Hobdari, 2015. "Board effectiveness in the European banking industry," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 25-41.
    20. Larelle Chapple & Victoria J Clout & David Tan, 2014. "Corporate governance and securities class actions," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(4), pages 525-547, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5595-:d:1104447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.