IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2788-d1056894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Implementation of Photovoltaic Integrated Multi-Skin Façade (PV-MSF) Design Based on Geometrical Concepts to Improve Building Energy Efficiency Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Tien Nhat Tran

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

  • Gu Seomun

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

  • Ruda Lee

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyomun Lee

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

  • Jongho Yoon

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

  • Dongsu Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study presents the influence of multi-skin façade (MSF) design with photovoltaic (PV) systems on the thermal behaviors and power generation potential when installed on the entire southern façade of an office building model. This study considers various flexible changes in MSF system design based on geometrical concepts. For the simulation model development, this study uses the medium-sized prototype office building model, developed based on the ASHRAE 90.1-2019. A total of 24 different patterns are created based on a pyramid configuration: triangular pyramid (TP) and rectangular pyramid (RP). Changing the tilt angle for PV integrated surfaces is the main method used to compare the power generation efficiency of different MSF configurations. Results from this analysis indicate that the proposed PV-integrated MSF system with generated patterns tends to reduce cooling and heating demands. The system also presents increased PV power generation performance compared to vertically installed PV systems (i.e., the base case). The designed pattern has the highest performance in the RP configuration, 49.4% and 46.6% higher than the base case when compared based on energy yield and energy yield per unit area parameter, respectively. Increasing the cavity depth and installing the PV-integrated roof surface angle to coincide with the local latitude can achieve efficient power generation for the TP configuration, provided that only one unit is required for a pattern. As for the RP configuration, reducing the cavity depth and combining the number of units (up to nine units) on the pattern surface can achieve the best-performing power generation, while the heating and cooling demands of the perimeter zone are not significantly impacted. The results show the influence of geometrical design aspects of MSF systems on energy efficiency and the potential to generate energy from PV systems. This study is a part of developing an energy-efficient design method for multi-skin façade systems for commercial buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Tien Nhat Tran & Gu Seomun & Ruda Lee & Hyomun Lee & Jongho Yoon & Dongsu Kim, 2023. "Development and Implementation of Photovoltaic Integrated Multi-Skin Façade (PV-MSF) Design Based on Geometrical Concepts to Improve Building Energy Efficiency Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2788-:d:1056894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saber, Esmail M. & Lee, Siew Eang & Manthapuri, Sumanth & Yi, Wang & Deb, Chirag, 2014. "PV (photovoltaics) performance evaluation and simulation-based energy yield prediction for tropical buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 588-595.
    2. Stevanović, Sanja, 2013. "Optimization of passive solar design strategies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 177-196.
    3. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Babatunde, A.A. & Abbasoglu, S. & Senol, M., 2018. "Analysis of the impact of dust, tilt angle and orientation on performance of PV Plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1017-1026.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lobaccaro, G. & Croce, S. & Lindkvist, C. & Munari Probst, M.C. & Scognamiglio, A. & Dahlberg, J. & Lundgren, M. & Wall, M., 2019. "A cross-country perspective on solar energy in urban planning: Lessons learned from international case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 209-237.
    2. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    3. Conceição, Ricardo & González-Aguilar, José & Merrouni, Ahmed Alami & Romero, Manuel, 2022. "Soiling effect in solar energy conversion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Zhang, Tiantian & Yang, Hongxing, 2019. "Flow and heat transfer characteristics of natural convection in vertical air channels of double-skin solar façades," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 107-120.
    5. Xiaoliang Wang & Bo Lei & Haiquan Bi & Tao Yu, 2019. "Study on the Thermal Performance of a Hybrid Heat Collecting Facade Used for Passive Solar Buildings in Cold Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Savvides, Andreas & Vassiliades, Constantinos & Michael, Aimilios & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2019. "Siting and building-massing considerations for the urban integration of active solar energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 963-974.
    7. Kumar Ganti, Praful & Naik, Hrushikesh & Kanungo Barada, Mohanty, 2022. "Environmental impact analysis and enhancement of factors affecting the photovoltaic (PV) energy utilization in mining industry by sparrow search optimization based gradient boosting decision tree appr," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    8. Deepak Jain Veerendra Kumar & Lelia Deville & Kenneth A. Ritter & Johnathan Richard Raush & Farzad Ferdowsi & Raju Gottumukkala & Terrence Lynn Chambers, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of 1.1 MW Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant in Louisiana," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    10. Kajetan Sadowski, 2021. "Implementation of the New European Bauhaus Principles as a Context for Teaching Sustainable Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Mustapha Mukhtar & Sandra Obiora & Nasser Yimen & Zhang Quixin & Olusola Bamisile & Pauline Jidele & Young I. Irivboje, 2021. "Effect of Inadequate Electrification on Nigeria’s Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Bushra, Nayab, 2022. "A comprehensive analysis of parametric design approaches for solar integration with buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Elaouzy, Y. & El Fadar, A., 2022. "Energy, economic and environmental benefits of integrating passive design strategies into buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Mohamed Mohana & Abdelaziz Salah Saidi & Salem Alelyani & Mohammed J. Alshayeb & Suhail Basha & Ali Eisa Anqi, 2021. "Small-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Power Prediction for Residential Load in Saudi Arabia Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    15. López, Marlén & Rubio, Ramón & Martín, Santiago & Ben Croxford,, 2017. "How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 692-703.
    16. Chi, Fang'ai & Xu, Ying & Wang, Xueru, 2022. "Transparent part design optimizations in buildings towards energy saving based on customized radiation sky dome model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    17. Gu, Bo & Shen, Huiqiang & Lei, Xiaohui & Hu, Hao & Liu, Xinyu, 2021. "Forecasting and uncertainty analysis of day-ahead photovoltaic power using a novel forecasting method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    18. Rahbari, Omid & Vafaeipour, Majid & Omar, Noshin & Rosen, Marc A. & Hegazy, Omar & Timmermans, Jean-Marc & Heibati, Seyedmohammadreza & Bossche, Peter Van Den, 2017. "An optimal versatile control approach for plug-in electric vehicles to integrate renewable energy sources and smart grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1053-1067.
    19. Méndez Echenagucia, Tomás & Capozzoli, Alfonso & Cascone, Ylenia & Sassone, Mario, 2015. "The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 577-591.
    20. Yadav, Anurag Singh & Mukherjee, V., 2021. "Conventional and advanced PV array configurations to extract maximum power under partial shading conditions: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 977-1005.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2788-:d:1056894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.