IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1923-d1041271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CRITIC-TOPSIS Based Evaluation of Smart Community Governance: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyao Yin

    (Technology and Information Center, Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China)

  • Jueqi Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Chenyang Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Linxiu Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhangyu Chang

    (Technology and Information Center, Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China)

Abstract

As the basic unit of a smart city, the smart community has received considerable attention and problems in community governance have appeared simultaneously. Previous studies of smart community governance have failed to encompass all aspects, especially the evaluation tools for ensuring its outcomes. Therefore, this paper developed a comprehensive evaluation framework based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS method combined with the identified evaluation indicators. Seven smart communities from four cities in China were selected as cases to show how this evaluation framework could be applied to decision-making. The results indicated that the evaluation indicator ”Mediation of Conflict” had the highest weight while ”The participation of social enterprises in governance” had the lowest weight. Furthermore, the Yucun community presented the highest governance performance among these seven smart communities. Several strategies are proposed for improving the level of smart community governance, such as devoting significant resources to develop infrastructure in smart communities, facilitating communication among multiple participants, and increasing funding for the implementation of smart communities. This research contributes both to the innovation of community governance evaluation and to the improvement of smart communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyao Yin & Jueqi Wang & Chenyang Wang & Linxiu Wang & Zhangyu Chang, 2023. "CRITIC-TOPSIS Based Evaluation of Smart Community Governance: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1923-:d:1041271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Yi & Wang, Ke & Huang, Zhimin, 2017. "Environment-adjusted operational performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic power plants: A three stage efficiency analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1153-1162.
    2. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2017. "Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 698-710.
    3. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    4. Wang, Zhaohua & Wang, Xiaomeng & Guo, Dongxue, 2017. "Policy implications of the purchasing intentions towards energy-efficient appliances among China’s urban residents: Do subsidies work?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 430-439.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Han-Xin & Chen, Xiaojie, 2018. "Promoting cooperation by punishing minority," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 316(C), pages 460-466.
    2. Zha, Donglan & Yang, Guanglei & Wang, Wenzhong & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Appliance energy labels and consumer heterogeneity: A latent class approach based on a discrete choice experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Li, Jiaxin & Wang, Zihan & Cheng, Xin & Shuai, Jing & Shuai, Chuanmin & Liu, Jing, 2020. "Has solar PV achieved the national poverty alleviation goals? Empirical evidence from the performances of 52 villages in rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Bahbouhi, Jalal Eddine & Moussa, Najem, 2019. "A graph-based model for public goods with leaderships," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 53-61.
    5. Ronewa Collen Nemalili & Lordwell Jhamba & Joseph Kiprono Kirui & Caston Sigauke, 2023. "Nowcasting Hourly-Averaged Tilt Angles of Acceptance for Solar Collector Applications Using Machine Learning Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Xu Lei & Tang Shiyun & Deng Yanfei & Yuan Yuan, 2020. "Sustainable operation-oriented investment risk evaluation and optimization for renewable energy project: a case study of wind power in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 223-241, July.
    7. Zha, Jiajing & Li, Cong & Fan, Suohai, 2022. "The effect of stability-based strategy updating on cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    8. Kamran Ali & Laiq Khan & Qudrat Khan & Shafaat Ullah & Saghir Ahmad & Sidra Mumtaz & Fazal Wahab Karam & Naghmash, 2019. "Robust Integral Backstepping Based Nonlinear MPPT Control for a PV System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2020. "Rewards based on public loyalty program promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    10. Woojae Kim & Sungmin Ko & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2019. "Is an Incentive Policy for Energy Efficient Products Effective for Air Purifiers? The Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Chen, Ya-Shan & Yang, Han-Xin & Guo, Wen-Zhong & Liu, Geng-Geng, 2018. "Promotion of cooperation based on swarm intelligence in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 614-620.
    12. Jonathan R B Fisher & Jensen Montambault & Kyle P Burford & Trisha Gopalakrishna & Yuta J Masuda & Sheila M W Reddy & Kaitlin Torphy & Andrea I Salcedo, 2018. "Knowledge diffusion within a large conservation organization and beyond," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    14. Zhao, Congyu & Jia, Rongwen & Dong, Kangyin, 2023. "Does financial inclusion achieve the dual dividends of narrowing carbon inequality within cities and between cities? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    16. Mingliang Zhao & Fangyi Liu & Yingjie Song & Jiangbo Geng, 2020. "Impact of Air Pollution Regulation and Technological Investment on Sustainable Development of Green Economy in Eastern China: Empirical Analysis with Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    18. Deng, Zheng-Hong & Huang, Yi-Jie & Gu, Zhi-Yang & Li-Gao,, 2018. "Multigames with social punishment and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 164-170.
    19. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Chen, Zengqiang & Liu, Qun, 2023. "Aspiration drives adaptive switching between two different payoff matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    20. Cheng, Shulei & Fan, Wei & Zhang, Jian & Wang, Ning & Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan, 2021. "Multi-sectoral determinants of carbon emission inequality in Chinese clustering cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1923-:d:1041271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.