IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13266-d1232753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transect Method for Promoting Landscape Conservation in the Climate Change Context: A Case-Study in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Vassiliki Vlami

    (ELLINIKI ETAIRIA Society for the Environment and Cultural Heritage, 10558 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioannis P. Kokkoris

    (Laboratory of Botany, Department of Biology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece)

  • Ioannis Charalampopoulos

    (Laboratory of General and Agricultural Meteorology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Thomas Doxiadis

    (Doxiadis+ Architects Landscape Architects, 10557 Athens, Greece)

  • Christos Giannakopoulos

    (Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece)

  • Miltiades Lazoglou

    (ELLINIKI ETAIRIA Society for the Environment and Cultural Heritage, 10558 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Within an EU Life project aiming to boost climate change adaptation in Greece, this study develops a transect method for rapid landscape-scale assessment. The procedure applies a holistic assessment of terrestrial landscapes at three spatial scales: a broad cross-section transect zone through the Peloponnese peninsula (240 km long, 1.416.6 km 2 ) and successively the delineation of 35 selected landscape areas and the associated landscape views. Climate change scenarios and relevant indices were incorporated to screen for climate and anthropogenic impacts, including phytoclimatic, erosion and wildfire analyses. The climatic and bioclimatic conditions were examined in three time periods (reference period: 1970–2000 and in the future periods 2031–2060 and 2071–2100). Based on the above framework, the climate change adaptation planning process is reviewed including the Regional Adaptation Action Plan (RAAP) of the Peloponnese Region. The results of this method application effectively assess both the “territorial” and “perceptual” aspects of the selected landscapes; mapping the potential threats, interpreting problems, identifying knowledge gaps and prioritizing vulnerable areas. Analyses show that combined land-use pressures and climatic shifts will cause landscape change, particularly evident in an increase of wildfires, in the near future. Currently, poor conservation measures do not adequately protect landscapes in most areas of the study from expanding anthropogenic pressures (urban sprawl, wetland draining, etc.); these conditions may further aggravate environmental safety concerns during future climate change conditions. The review also documents poor attention to landscape conservation within the current RAAP report. The proposed transect method may assist in promoting landscape appreciation by setting an “enabling framework” for landscape-scale conservation planning during the climate change adaptation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Vassiliki Vlami & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & Ioannis Charalampopoulos & Thomas Doxiadis & Christos Giannakopoulos & Miltiades Lazoglou, 2023. "A Transect Method for Promoting Landscape Conservation in the Climate Change Context: A Case-Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13266-:d:1232753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13266/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13266/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Raymond & Gregory Brown, 2011. "Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 653-678, February.
    2. Theano S. Terkenli, 2022. "Landscape and justice: the case of Greeks, space and law," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 797-810, August.
    3. Livia Bizikova & Erica Crawford & Maria Nijnik & Rob Swart, 2014. "Climate change adaptation planning in agriculture: processes, experiences and lessons learned from early adapters," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 411-430, April.
    4. Marcela Prokopová & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Radek Plch & Pavel Cudlín, 2019. "Envisioning Present and Future Land-Use Change under Varying Ecological Regimes and Their Influence on Landscape Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Kalliope Pediaditi & Patrick Moquay, 2022. "Landscape injustices in polarised communities: unearthing perceptions at Sitia UNESCO Geopark, Greece," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 767-782, August.
    6. Anna Marson, 2023. "Landscape in Spatial Planning: Some Evidence on Methodological Issues and Political Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Zhonghao Zhang & Yaojen Tu & Xin Li, 2016. "Quantifying the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Urbanization along Urban-Rural Gradient with a Roadscape Transect Approach: A Case Study in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Yu-Pin Lin & Chi-Ju Chen & Wan-Yu Lien & Wen-Hao Chang & Joy R. Petway & Li-Chi Chiang, 2019. "Landscape Conservation Planning to Sustain Ecosystem Services under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Vassiliki Vlami & Stamatis Zogaris & Hakan Djuma & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2019. "A Field Method for Landscape Conservation Surveying: The Landscape Assessment Protocol (LAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Julian Manning & Catriona Macleod & Vanessa Lucieer, 2023. "Seascape Visual Characterization: Combining Viewing Geometry and Physical Features to Quantify the Perception of Seascape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Richard Smardon, 2021. "Ecosystem Services for Scenic Quality Landscape Management: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Edward Maltby, 2022. "The Wetlands Paradigm Shift in Response to Changing Societal Priorities: A Reflective Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-42, September.
    13. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Zhiqiang Wu & Yuankai Wang & Wei Gan & Yixuan Zou & Wen Dong & Shiqi Zhou & Mo Wang, 2023. "A Survey of the Landscape Visibility Analysis Tools and Technical Improvements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Philippe A. Ker Rault & Phoebe Koundouri & Ebun Akinsete & Ralf Ludwig & Verena Huber-Garcia & Stella Tsani & Vicenc Acuna & Eleni Kalogianni & Joke Luttik & Kasper Kok & Nikolaos Skoulikidis & Jochen, 2019. "Down scaling of climate change scenarii to river basin level: A transdisciplinary methodology applied to Evrotas river basin, Greece," DEOS Working Papers 1913, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    16. Anandhi, Aavudai, 2017. "CISTA-A: Conceptual model using indicators selected by systems thinking for adaptation strategies in a changing climate: Case study in agro-ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 345(C), pages 41-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Liu & Sihai Liu & Kun Xing, 2024. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Exploration of Trade-Offs and Synergistic Relationships in Arid Areas: A Case Study of the Kriya River Basin in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Marcela Prokopová & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Radek Plch & Pavel Cudlín, 2019. "Envisioning Present and Future Land-Use Change under Varying Ecological Regimes and Their Influence on Landscape Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Wafaa Majeed Mutashar Al-Hameedi & Jie Chen & Cheechouyang Faichia & Biswajit Nath & Bazel Al-Shaibah & Ali Al-Aizari, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis of Land Use/Cover Change and Land Surface Temperature for Landscape Risk Pattern Change Evaluation of Baghdad City, Iraq, Using CA–Markov and ANN Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-31, July.
    5. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Vizinho, André & Avelar, David & Fonseca, Ana Lúcia & Carvalho, Silvia & Sucena-Paiva, Leonor & Pinho, Pedro & Nunes, Alice & Branquinho, Cristina & Vasconcelos, Ana Cátia & Santos, Filipe Duarte & Ro, 2021. "Framing the application of Adaptation Pathways for agroforestry in Mediterranean drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Schmidt, Katja & Walz, Ariane & Martín-López, Berta & Sachse, René, 2017. "Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 270-288.
    8. Julian Manning & Catriona Macleod & Vanessa Lucieer, 2023. "Seascape Visual Characterization: Combining Viewing Geometry and Physical Features to Quantify the Perception of Seascape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Raymond, Christopher M. & Kenter, Jasper O. & Plieninger, Tobias & Turner, Nancy J. & Alexander, Karen A., 2014. "Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-156.
    10. Yan Liu & Yongjiu Feng, 2016. "Simulating the Impact of Economic and Environmental Strategies on Future Urban Growth Scenarios in Ningbo, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Liu, Zhen & Tian, Jiali & Wang, Kexin & Lan, Jing, 2023. "The impact of farmland circulation on the carbon footprint of agricultural cultivation in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 792-801.
    12. Huishu Chen & Li Yang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Experience of Tour Routes in the Humble Administrator’s Garden Based on Isovist Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: Evidence from geographically weighted regression model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 404-414.
    14. Vassiliki Vlami & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & Stamatis Zogaris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2020. "Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Natura 2000 Network: Introducing Proxy Indicators and Conflict Risk in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Serena Ciabò & Alessandro Marucci, 2017. "Sprinkling: An Approach to Describe Urbanization Dynamics in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Mortoja, Md. Golam & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Mayere, Severine, 2020. "What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas? A systematic review of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Bin, 2018. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China's agriculture sector: A quantile regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 15-27.
    18. Wiréhn, Lotten, 2018. "Nordic agriculture under climate change: A systematic review of challenges, opportunities and adaptation strategies for crop production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 63-74.
    19. Sandra Mayordomo-Maya & Jorge Hermosilla-Pla, 2022. "Evaluation of Landscape Quality in Valencia’s Agricultural Gardens—A Method Adapted to Multifunctional, Territorialized Agrifood Systems (MTAS)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Vassiliki Vlami & Jan Danek & Stamatis Zogaris & Eirini Gallou & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2020. "Residents’ Views on Landscape and Ecosystem Services during a Wind Farm Proposal in an Island Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13266-:d:1232753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.