IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12657-d1221836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Heat Transfer Characteristics of Medium-Shallow Borehole Ground Heat Exchangers with Various Working Fluids

Author

Listed:
  • Kexun Wang

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Tishi Huang

    (Shandong Geology and Mineral Resources Terrestrial Heat Development Investment Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China)

  • Wenke Zhang

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Zhiqiang Zhang

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xueqing Ma

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Leyao Zhang

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

Medium-shallow borehole ground heat exchangers (BGHEs) utilize a burial depth ranging from 200 to 600 m. The heat exchange capacity of a single medium-shallow BGHE is higher than that of a single shallow BGHE. Compared to medium-deep BGHEs, the cost of medium-shallow BGHEs is lower, and both heating and cooling can be achieved, while the former can only be used for heating. However, there is a relative lack of research on the heat transfer characteristics of medium-shallow BGHEs, especially on the influence of the working fluid type on the heat transfer performance of BGHEs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of different working fluids on the performance of medium-shallow BGHEs. First, a heat transfer model for medium-shallow BGHEs was established considering the ground temperature gradient and geothermal heat flow, and its accuracy was validated using experimental test data. Second, the model was used to compare and analyze the effects of various working fluids on the heat transfer performance, pressure loss, and potential environmental benefits of BGHEs. Based on economic analysis, CO 2 was determined to be the most suitable working fluid among the organic fluids considered. Finally, the influence of the number of boreholes and the type of working fluid on the heat transfer performance of borehole clusters consisting of 2 and 4 boreholes was analyzed using the superposition principle. The results indicated that CO 2 could provide the highest heat transfer among the various working fluids selected in this study, as its heat extraction and heat dissipation were approximately 15% and 12% higher than those achieved by water. Isobutane (R600a) achieved the highest net heat and emission reduction, surpassing water by 66.7% and 73.6%, respectively. Regarding the four boreholes, the outlet temperature of the BGHEs gradually decreased at the end of each heating season. After 10 years of operation, the value decreased by approximately 2 °C. The results in this paper provide a theoretical basis and technical guidance for the rational selection of working fluids and improvements in the heat transfer performance of BGHEs, which could promote the development and application of medium-shallow geothermal energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexun Wang & Tishi Huang & Wenke Zhang & Zhiqiang Zhang & Xueqing Ma & Leyao Zhang, 2023. "An Analysis of the Heat Transfer Characteristics of Medium-Shallow Borehole Ground Heat Exchangers with Various Working Fluids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12657-:d:1221836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa Omer, Abdeen, 2008. "Ground-source heat pumps systems and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 344-371, February.
    2. Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Singh, Mrityunjay & Bär, Kristian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "Thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling of an enhanced geothermal system in a fractured reservoir using carbon dioxide as heat transmission fluid- A sensitivity investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    3. Singh, Mrityunjay & Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Ershadnia, Reza & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza & Sass, Ingo, 2023. "Comparative study on heat extraction from Soultz-sous-Forêts geothermal field using supercritical carbon dioxide and water as the working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Yildirim, Nurdan & Parmanto, Slamet & Akkurt, Gulden Gokcen, 2019. "Thermodynamic assessment of downhole heat exchangers for geothermal power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1080-1091.
    5. Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Singh, Mrityunjay & Turan, Aysegul & Bär, Kristian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "Simulations and global sensitivity analysis of the thermo-hydraulic-mechanical processes in a fractured geothermal reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Jiewen Deng & Qingpeng Wei & Shi He & Mei Liang & Hui Zhang, 2020. "Simulation Analysis on the Heat Performance of Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Medium-Depth Geothermal Heat Pump Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Zhang, Fangfang & Fang, Liang & Jia, Linrui & Man, Yi & Cui, Ping & Zhang, Wenke & Fang, Zhaohong, 2021. "A dimension reduction algorithm for numerical simulation of multi-borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2235-2245.
    8. Lyu, Zehao & Song, Xianzhi & Li, Gensheng & Hu, Xiaodong & Shi, Yu & Xu, Zhipeng, 2017. "Numerical analysis of characteristics of a single U-tube downhole heat exchanger in the borehole for geothermal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 186-196.
    9. Chen, Siyuan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Hailong & Mclellan, Benjamin & Zhang, Tiantian & Tan, Zhizhou, 2019. "Investment decision on shallow geothermal heating & cooling based on compound options model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Tuschl & Tomislav Kurevija, 2023. "Revitalization Modelling of a Mature Oil Field with Bottom-Type Aquifer into Geothermal Resource—Reservoir Engineering and Techno-Economic Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Saeed Mahmoodpour & Mrityunjay Singh & Ramin Mahyapour & Sri Kalyan Tangirala & Kristian Bär & Ingo Sass, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Processes at Soultz-sous-Forêts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Wanli Gao & Jingtao Zhao & Suping Peng, 2022. "UNet–Based Temperature Simulation of Hot Dry Rock in the Gonghe Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. He, Yuting & Jia, Min & Li, Xiaogang & Yang, Zhaozhong & Song, Rui, 2021. "Performance analysis of coaxial heat exchanger and heat-carrier fluid in medium-deep geothermal energy development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 938-959.
    5. Muhammad Asad & Vincenzo Guida & Alessandro Mauro, 2023. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Efficacy of a Real Downhole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Hongying Tan & Hejuan Liu & Xilin Shi & Hongling Ma & Xiaosong Qiu & Yintong Guo & Shengnan Ban, 2023. "Mechanical and Acoustic Response of Low-Permeability Sandstone under Multilevel Cyclic Loading-Unloading Stress Paths," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Xiang Gao & Tailu Li & Yao Zhang & Xiangfei Kong & Nan Meng, 2022. "A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Javadi, Hossein & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfallah, Mohsen, 2019. "Performance of ground heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of recent advances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 207-233.
    9. Yuhang Wang & Mousa HosseiniMehr & Arjan Marelis & Hadi Hajibeygi, 2023. "A Generic Framework for Multiscale Simulation of High and Low Enthalpy Fractured Geothermal Reservoirs under Varying Thermodynamic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Isa Kolo & Christopher S. Brown & Gioia Falcone & David Banks, 2023. "Repurposing a Geothermal Exploration Well as a Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger: Understanding Long-Term Effects of Lithological Layering, Flow Direction, and Circulation Flow Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Archan Shah & Moncef Krarti & Joe Huang, 2022. "Energy Performance Evaluation of Shallow Ground Source Heat Pumps for Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Singh, Mrityunjay & Bär, Kristian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "Thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling of an enhanced geothermal system in a fractured reservoir using carbon dioxide as heat transmission fluid- A sensitivity investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    13. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    14. Bakirci, Kadir & Colak, Derya, 2012. "Effect of a superheating and sub-cooling heat exchanger to the performance of a ground source heat pump system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 996-1004.
    15. Nguyen, Hiep V. & Law, Ying Lam E. & Alavy, Masih & Walsh, Philip R. & Leong, Wey H. & Dworkin, Seth B., 2014. "An analysis of the factors affecting hybrid ground-source heat pump installation potential in North America," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 28-38.
    16. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    17. Luo, Jin & Zhang, Qi & Liang, Changming & Wang, Haiqi & Ma, Xinning, 2023. "An overview of the recent development of the Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 269-279.
    18. Li, Biao & Han, Zongwei & Bai, Chenguang & Hu, Honghao, 2019. "The influence of soil thermal properties on the operation performance on ground source heat pump system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 903-913.
    19. Alaie, Omid & Maddahian, Reza & Heidarinejad, Ghassem, 2021. "Investigation of thermal interaction between shallow boreholes in a GSHE using the FLS-STRCM model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1137-1150.
    20. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12657-:d:1221836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.