IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11761-d1206895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Butterfly Algorithm for Sustainable Lot Size Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Zoubida Benmamoun

    (Faculty of Engineering, Liwa College of Technology, Abu Dhabi 41009, United Arab Emirates)

  • Widad Fethallah

    (National School for Applied Sciences, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier 93000, Morocco)

  • Mustapha Ahlaqqach

    (LARILE ENSEM, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20202, Morocco)

  • Ikhlef Jebbor

    (GS Laboratory, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco)

  • Mouad Benmamoun

    (ANISSE, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10170, Morocco)

  • Mariam Elkhechafi

    (ISCAE, Casablanca 27182, Morocco)

Abstract

The challenges faced by classical supply chain management affect efficiency with regard to business. Classical supply chain management is associated with high risks due to a lack of accountability and transparency. The use of optimization algorithms is considered decision-making support to improve the operations and processes in green manufacturing. This paper suggests a solution to the green lot size optimization problem using bio-inspired algorithms, specifically, the butterfly algorithm. For this, our methodology consisted of first collecting the real data, then the data were expressed with a simple function with several constraints to optimize the total costs while reducing the CO 2 emission, serving as input for the butterfly algorithm BA model. The BA model was then used to find the optimal lot size that balances cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Through extensive experiments, we compared the results of BA with those of other bio-inspired algorithms, showing that BA consistently outperformed the alternatives. The contribution of this work is to provide an efficient solution to the sustainable lot-size optimization problem, thereby reducing the environmental impact and optimizing the supply chain well. Conclusions: BA has shown that it can achieve the best results compared to other existing optimization methods. It is also a valuable chainsaw tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoubida Benmamoun & Widad Fethallah & Mustapha Ahlaqqach & Ikhlef Jebbor & Mouad Benmamoun & Mariam Elkhechafi, 2023. "Butterfly Algorithm for Sustainable Lot Size Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11761-:d:1206895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samia Bouazza & Zoubida Benmamoun & Hanaa Hachimi, 2023. "Maritime Bilateral Connectivity Analysis for Sustainable Maritime Growth: Case of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Gede B. Suprayoga & Patrick Witte & Tejo Spit, 2020. "Identifying barriers to implementing a sustainability assessment tool for road project planning: an institutional perspective from practitioners in Indonesia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(13), pages 2380-2401, November.
    3. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2015. "Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness: Practice-performance framework and research propositions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 216-233.
    4. Plambeck, Erica L., 2012. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S1), pages 64-74.
    5. Houda Taoudi Benchekroun & Zoubida Benmamoun & Hanaa Hachimi, 2022. "Implementation and Sustainability Assessment of a Public Procurement Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Jolanta Poplawska & Ashraf Labib & Deborah M. Reed, 2017. "From vicious to virtuous circles: problem structuring for quantified decision making in operationalization of corporate social responsibility," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(3), pages 291-307, March.
    7. Lin Sun & Suisui Chen & Jiucheng Xu & Yun Tian, 2019. "Improved Monarch Butterfly Optimization Algorithm Based on Opposition-Based Learning and Random Local Perturbation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, February.
    8. Uday Rao & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Sridhar Tayur, 2000. "Development of a Rapid-Response Supply Chain at Caterpillar," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 189-204, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoubida Benmamoun & Khaoula Khlie & Mohammad Dehghani & Youness Gherabi, 2024. "WOA: Wombat Optimization Algorithm for Solving Supply Chain Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-61, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suchitra Pattnaik & Mitali Madhusmita Nayak & Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli, 2021. "Recent Trends in Sustainable Inventory Models: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Chan, Ying Tung & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Optimal carbon tax rates in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with a supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Ji, Guojun & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Yang, Guangyong, 2014. "Constructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 211-219.
    4. Anshul Sheopuri & Ganesh Janakiraman & Sridhar Seshadri, 2010. "New Policies for the Stochastic Inventory Control Problem with Two Supply Sources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 734-745, June.
    5. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    6. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    7. Peng Liu & Ying Chen, 2022. "Differential Game Model of Shared Manufacturing Supply Chain Considering Low-Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Chen, Xi, 2018. "When does store consolidation lead to higher emissions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 109-122.
    9. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Chien-Ming Chen, 2017. "Supply Chain Strategies and Carbon Intensity: The Roles of Process Leanness, Diversification Strategy, and Outsourcing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 603-620, July.
    11. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Varvara S. Orfanidou & Nikolaos P. Rachaniotis & Giannis T. Tsoulfas & Gregory P. Chondrokoukis, 2023. "Life Cycle Costing Implementation in Green Public Procurement: A Case Study from the Greek Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Ziao Zhou & Yuan Li & Yongli Zhang, 2023. "Carbon Offsetting-Driven Multi-Actor Low-Carbon Collaborative Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2009. "Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 319-334, June.
    15. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    16. Shoufeng Ji & Dan Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng, 2018. "Joint Decisions on Emission Reduction and Inventory Replenishment with Overconfidence and Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Louise Laumann Kjaer & Niels Karim Høst-Madsen & Jannick H. Schmidt & Tim C. McAloone, 2015. "Application of Environmental Input-Output Analysis for Corporate and Product Environmental Footprints—Learnings from Three Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Gong, Mengfeng & Gao, Yuan & Koh, Lenny & Sutcliffe, Charles & Cullen, John, 2019. "The role of customer awareness in promoting firm sustainability and sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 88-96.
    19. Ülengin, Füsun & Işık, Mine & Ekici, Şule Önsel & Özaydın, Özay & Kabak, Özgür & Topçu, Y. İlker, 2018. "Policy developments for the reduction of climate change impacts by the transportation sector," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 36-50.
    20. Weihua Liu & Wanying Wei & Xiaoyu Yan & Di Wang, 2019. "Supply Contract Design with Asymmetric Corporate Social Responsibility Cost Information in Service Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11761-:d:1206895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.