IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11566-d1203179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Cooperative Model Choices in the Socially Unsustainable Environment: Evidence from Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Remigijus Civinskas

    (Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University, V. Putvinskio str. 23, 44243 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Rimantas Stašys

    (Departament of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipeda University, S. Nėries str. 5, 92227 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Asta Pancerovienė

    (Department of Business and Administration, Faculty of Business, Klaipėda Valstybinė Kolegija, Jaunystės str. 1, 91274 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Aušra Anužienė

    (Department of Business and Administration, Faculty of Business, Klaipėda Valstybinė Kolegija, Jaunystės str. 1, 91274 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Abstract

This research analyses the establishment and development of social cooperatives exposed to adverse factors in socially unsustainable contexts. The study focuses on a Lithuanian case study, with participants having limited experience creating a socially resilient enterprise ecosystem. The study employed a qualitative approach using case study and comparative analysis methods. The study found that Lithuania’s opportunities to leverage the benefits of social cooperatives are held back by a weak cooperative movement, a socially unsustainable environment, and limited understanding among professionals. The involvement of public policy actors in debates on legalising social business models is also limited. The study participants had mixed opinions about the social cooperative model for business development. Some favoured its cooperative principles and profit-sharing advantages, while others preferred non-profit organisations or smaller communities. The study also found a contradiction in the concepts of social business. The researchers suggest that the conditions for establishing social cooperatives could be more favourable in Lithuania, but social business founders require help understanding cooperative companies’ organisation and finances, for which the current public and private resources available are insufficient. Lithuania’s current policy of support and regulation for social business prioritises several social business models, which complicates the decision-making process for prospective social cooperative founders.

Suggested Citation

  • Remigijus Civinskas & Rimantas Stašys & Asta Pancerovienė & Aušra Anužienė, 2023. "Social Cooperative Model Choices in the Socially Unsustainable Environment: Evidence from Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11566-:d:1203179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ignacio Bretos & Marie J. Bouchard & Alberto Zevi, 2020. "Institutional and organizational trajectories in social economy enterprises: Resilience, transformation and regeneration," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 351-358, September.
    2. Erika Ribašauskienė & Diana Šumylė & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Mangirdas Morkunas, 2019. "Evaluating Public Policy Support for Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Anna Grignani & Michela Gozzellino & Alessandro Sciullo & Dario Padovan, 2021. "Community Cooperative: A New Legal Form for Enhancing Social Capital for the Development of Renewable Energy Communities in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Sonja Novkovic, 2022. "Cooperative identity as a yardstick for transformative change," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 313-336, June.
    5. Barbara Richter & Jon H. Hanf, 2021. "Sustainability as “Value of Cooperatives”—Can (Wine) Cooperatives Use Sustainability as a Driver for a Brand Concept?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Antonio Fici, 2015. "Recognition and legal Forms of Social Enterprises in Europe: A Critical Analysis from a Comparative Law Perspective," Euricse Working Papers 1582, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    7. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Thomas BAUWENS & Jacques DEFOURNY, 2017. "Social Capital And Mutual Versus Public Benefit: The Case Of Renewable Energy Cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 203-232, June.
    8. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Antonio PICCIOTTI, 2017. "Towards Sustainability: The Innovation Paths Of Social Enterprise," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 233-256, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cemil Ozan Soydemir & Mehmet Erçek, 2023. "The resurrection of earlier imprints post mortem: Explaining the Turkish agricultural cooperative movement with an imprinting theory lens, 1888–1937," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1199-1232, December.
    2. Michael Krug & Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Matteo Caldera & Elena De Luca, 2022. "Mainstreaming Community Energy: Is the Renewable Energy Directive a Driver for Renewable Energy Communities in Germany and Italy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    4. Frans H. J. M. Coenen & Thomas Hoppe, 2022. "Renewable Energy Communities as a New Actor in Home Energy Savings," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 108-122.
    5. Friedrich Schneider & Mangirdas Morkunas & Erika Quendler, 2021. "Measuring the Immeasurable: The Evolution of the Size of Informal Economy in the Agricultural Sector in the EU-15 up to 2019," CESifo Working Paper Series 8937, CESifo.
    6. Katherine Sugar & Janette Webb, 2022. "Value for Money: Local Authority Action on Clean Energy for Net Zero," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Antonio Rafael Peña-Sánchez & José Ruiz-Chico & Mercedes Jiménez-García & José Antonio López-Sánchez, 2020. "Tourism and the SDGs: An Analysis of Economic Growth, Decent Employment, and Gender Equality in the European Union (2009–2018)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Marian Oliński & Jarosław Mioduszewski, 2022. "Determinants of Development of Social Enterprises according to the Theory of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Isabel Saz-Gil & Ignacio Bretos & Millán Díaz-Foncea, 2021. "Cooperatives and Social Capital: A Narrative Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Bianchi, F.R. & Bosio, B. & Conte, F. & Massucco, S. & Mosaico, G. & Natrella, G. & Saviozzi, M., 2023. "Modelling and optimal management of renewable energy communities using reversible solid oxide cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    11. repec:thr:techub:10021:y:2021:i:1:p:661-674 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ahmed Herab & Ahmad Al-Ghamdi & Khodran Alzahrani & Khalid M. Elhindi & Muhammad Muddassir & Hazem S. Kassem, 2022. "A Framework for Quantifying the Strength of Partnerships between Agricultural Cooperatives and Development Actors: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Budi Harsanto & Asep Mulyana & Yudi Ahmad Faisal & Venny Mellandhia Shandy & Muntasir Alam, 2022. "A Systematic Review on Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in the Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Innocent BAYAI & Sylvanus IKHIDE, 2018. "FINANCING STRUCTURE AND FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF SELECTED SADC MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS (MFIs)," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 665-696, December.
    15. Musolino, Monica & Maggio, Gaetano & D'Aleo, Erika & Nicita, Agatino, 2023. "Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 540-555.
    16. Marco De Nigris & Francesca Giuliano, 2023. "The Role of Organised Civil Society in the Implementation of the Renewable Energy Transition and Renewable Energy Communities: A Qualitative Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    17. Vrain, E. & Wilson, C. & Kerr, L. & Wilson, M., 2022. "Social influence in the adoption of digital consumer innovations for climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. S. Chinju Chandran & S. Rajitha Kumar, 2024. "Industrial cooperatives: A sustainable business model for promoting social entrepreneurship," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Phallapa Petison & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "A Quest for a Sustainable Social Enterprise Model: The Case of Amphawa Chaipattananurak, the Kingdom of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Rafael Ziegler & Cynthia Poirier & Marie Lacasse & Evan Murray, 2023. "Circular Economy and Cooperatives—An Exploratory Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    21. Confidence Ndlovu & Mfundo M. Masuku, 2021. "The Efficacy of Agricultural Cooperatives Towards Enhancing Food Security in Rural Areas: Mbombela Local Municipality, Mpumalanga Province," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 21(1), pages 661-674, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11566-:d:1203179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.