IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11003-d1193489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Corporate Resource Abundance on the Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Whole Process Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Tang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Chun-Ai Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Heng-Yu Lv

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Fu-Ying Hao

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

Exploiting a comparative advantage through resource endowment is a way to promote the transformation and upgrading of enterprises and high-quality economic development. Based on resource-based theory, this paper takes the listed companies of China’s manufacturing industry as a sample and classifies them into leading, potential, catching-up, and exiting enterprises according to the abundance of financial and human resources. In terms of the research perspective, this paper adopts resource abundance as the starting point to explore its impact on enterprise transformation and upgrading and incorporates technological innovation into the framework to investigate its transmission mechanism. The results indicate that the resource abundance of enterprises directly promotes the transformation and upgrading of enterprises. Notably, the mechanism identification test suggests the following. (1) From the perspective of innovation investment, innovation investment intensity is an important channel for manufacturing companies to transform and upgrade. (2) From the perspective of innovation direction, higher levels of resources allow leading enterprises to accelerate transformation and upgrading through product and process innovation. In contrast, catching-up enterprises tend to foster product innovation rather than process innovation to transform and update, while potential enterprises are likely to foster process innovation to transform and update rather than product innovation. On the other hand, the path of transformation and upgrading through product or process innovation is obstructed for the exiting enterprises. (3) From the perspective of innovation output, all but the exiting enterprises can be transformed and upgraded by increasing their innovation output. Overall, considering the impact of corporate innovation behavior, this research offers new insights into the relationship between resource abundance and transformation and upgrading, and it provides inspiration for promoting transformation and upgrading in Chinese manufacturing enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Tang & Chun-Ai Ma & Heng-Yu Lv & Fu-Ying Hao, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Resource Abundance on the Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Whole Process Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11003-:d:1193489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anqi Wang & Lianmei Zhu & Huanan Sun & Shali Wang & Haijing Ma, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Enterprise Digital Transformation and Enterprise Green Innovation—The Case of 11 Years A-Share Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Josef Zweimüller & Johann K. Brunner, 2005. "Innovation And Growth With Rich And Poor Consumers," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 233-262, May.
    3. Varadarajan, Rajan, 2023. "Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: Does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource Advantages?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Hoegl, Martin & Gibbert, Michael & Mazursky, David, 2008. "Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1382-1391, September.
    5. Fang-Yi Lo & Kun-Huang Huarng & Andrea Rey-Martí, 2019. "Entrepreneur subsidiary of business groups from emerging markets: a multi-level perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 471-483, June.
    6. T. Vanacker & V. Collewaert & I. Paeleman, 2013. "The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/837, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Cuthbertson, Richard W. & Furseth, Peder Inge, 2022. "Digital services and competitive advantage: Strengthening the links between RBV, KBV, and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 168-176.
    8. Daron Acemoglu, 2003. "Patterns of Skill Premia," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 199-230.
    9. Ad Jong & Nicolas A. Zacharias & Edwin J. Nijssen, 2021. "How young companies can effectively manage their slack resources over time to ensure sales growth: the contingent role of value-based selling," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 304-326, March.
    10. Mengqi Gong & Zhe You & Linting Wang & Jinhua Cheng, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Trade Comparative Advantage, and the Manufacturing Industry’s Green Transformation and Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Florina Pinzaru & Alina Mihaela Dima & Alexandra Zbuchea & Zoltan Veres, 2022. "Adopting Sustainability and Digital Transformation in Business in Romania: A Multifaceted Approach in the Context of the Just Transition," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 1-28.
    12. Renjing Hu & Yanyang Yan & Daqing Gong, 2021. "Effects of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Manufacturing Structural Upgrading: Evidence from China," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-8, August.
    13. Maochun Zhou & Rui Fan, 2023. "The Impact of Green Capital Structure on Enterprise Development and the Regulation of Technological Innovation under Carbon Peaking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Tom Vanacker & Veroniek Collewaert & Ine Paeleman, 2013. "The Relationship between Slack Resources and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of Venture Capital and Angel Investors," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 1070-1096, September.
    15. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Yi-Fen, 2010. "Creative workforce density, organizational slack, and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 411-417, April.
    16. Zongguo Ma & Xueai Fan & Yanli Zhang & Beibei Hu, 2023. "Understanding the Influencing Factors of Enterprise Transformation and Upgrading Capability: A Case Study of the National Innovation Demonstration Zones, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Justin Tan & Mike W. Peng, 2003. "Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(13), pages 1249-1263, December.
    18. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    19. Yusheng Kong & Mary Donkor & Mohammed Musah & Joseph Akwasi Nkyi & George Oppong Appiagyei Ampong, 2023. "Capital Structure and Corporates Financial Sustainability: Evidence from Listed Non-Financial Entities in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Hongyi Zhang & Hsing Hung Chen & Kunseng Lao & Zhengyu Ren, 2022. "The Impacts of Resource Endowment, and Environmental Regulations on Sustainability—Empirical Evidence Based on Data from Renewable Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    21. Hongshan Ai & Shenglan Hu & Ke Li & Shuai Shao, 2020. "Environmental regulation, total factor productivity, and enterprise duration: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2284-2296, September.
    22. Zhang, JingJing & Guan, Jiancheng, 2018. "The time-varying impacts of government incentives on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 132-144.
    23. Jian Shen & Zhenquan Sha & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2020. "Enterprise Adaptive Marketing Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation Performance: An Opportunity–Resource Integration Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    24. Young Sik Cho & Kevin Linderman, 2020. "Resource-Based Product and Process Innovation Model: Theory Development and Empirical Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    25. Gary Dushnitsky & Michael J. Lenox, 2005. "When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(10), pages 947-965, October.
    26. Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Rongyun Tang, 2020. "Impacts of Environmental Regulation on the Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    27. Shuhao Liang & Tingting Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Enterprises? The Mediating Role of R&D Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    28. Xiaoyang Xu & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Ayaz & Sonia Lohana, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    29. Maochun Zhou & Min Zhao, 2023. "Research on the Performance Transmission of Green Technology Innovation in the Coal Industry under the Goal of Carbon Peaking and the Moderating Role of Government Macro-Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    30. Fan Yang & Yanming Sun & Yuan Zhang & Tao Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Manufacturing Industry Transformation and Upgrading: A Case Study of Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.
    31. Shangui Peng & Jian Wang & Hao Sun & Zhengning Guo, 2022. "How Does the Spatial Misallocation of Land Resources Affect Urban Industrial Transformation and Upgrading? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khoa T. Tran & Phuong V. Nguyen & Linh M. Nguyen, 2018. "The Role of Financial Slack, Employee Creative Self-Efficacy and Learning Orientation in Innovation and Organizational Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Ine Paeleman & Tom Vanacker, 2015. "Less is More, or Not? On the Interplay between Bundles of Slack Resources, Firm Performance and Firm Survival," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 819-848, September.
    3. Yun Song & Hongqu He & Caiyu Yan, 2022. "Impacts of top management team fault‐line on firm's innovation—Financial slack over‐investment and underinvestment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3348-3360, December.
    4. Sulu Zhu & Pengqun Gao & Zhen Tang & Ming Tian, 2022. "The Research Venation Analysis and Future Prospects of Organizational Slack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Josep M. Argilés-Bosch & Josep Garcia-Blandón & Diego Ravenda & Mónica Martínez-Blasco, 2018. "An empirical analysis of the curvilinear relationship between slack and firm performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 361-397, December.
    6. Ad Jong & Nicolas A. Zacharias & Edwin J. Nijssen, 2021. "How young companies can effectively manage their slack resources over time to ensure sales growth: the contingent role of value-based selling," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 304-326, March.
    7. Symeou, Pavlos C. & Zyglidopoulos, Stelios & Gardberg, Naomi A., 2019. "Corporate environmental performance: Revisiting the role of organizational slack," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 169-182.
    8. Tom Vanacker & Veroniek Collewaert & Shaker A. Zahra, 2017. "Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1305-1326, June.
    9. Zongguo Ma & Xueai Fan & Yanli Zhang & Beibei Hu, 2023. "Understanding the Influencing Factors of Enterprise Transformation and Upgrading Capability: A Case Study of the National Innovation Demonstration Zones, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Paeleman, Ine & Fuss, Catherine & Vanacker, Tom, 2017. "Untangling the multiple effects of slack resources on firms’ exporting behavior," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 769-781.
    11. Jinliang Chen & Kangkang Yu & Jiaowei Gong, 2022. "Supply chain slack and sustainable development performance: The “fit–adjust” effect of objective and perceived environmental uncertainties," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1595-1604, September.
    12. Su-In Kim & Hyejeong Shin & Heejeong Shin & Sorah Park, 2019. "Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Zhang, JingJing & Guan, Jiancheng, 2018. "The time-varying impacts of government incentives on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 132-144.
    14. Xiaoxiang Li & Shuhan Zhang, 2021. "Does Slack Buffer? Market Performance after Environmental Shock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Ling Jin & Jun Hyeok Choi & Saerona Kim & Kwanghee Cho, 2022. "Slack Resources, Corporate Performance, and COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Andreea N. Kiss & Stephanie Fernhaber & Patricia P. McDougall–Covin, 2018. "Slack, Innovation, and Export Intensity: Implications for Small– and Medium–Sized Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(5), pages 671-697, September.
    17. Saehwa Hong & Hyung-Deok Shin, 2021. "Organizational slack and innovativeness: the moderating role of institutional transition in the Asian financial crisis," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 370-389, July.
    18. Elena Antarciuc & Qinghua Zhu & Jaber Almarri & Senlin Zhao & Yunting Feng & Martin Agyemang, 2018. "Sustainable Venture Capital Investments: An Enabler Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Julien Gourdon, 2011. "Wage inequality in developing countries: South–South trade matters," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 58(4), pages 359-383, December.
    20. Bedford, Anna & Ma, Le & Ma, Nelson & Vojvoda, Kristina, 2022. "Australian innovation: Patent database construction and first evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11003-:d:1193489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.