IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9119-d1164313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities for Improving Herbicide Resistance Management Strategies across New Zealand’s Arable Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Espig

    (AgResearch, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand
    M.E. Consulting, Christchurch 8022, New Zealand)

  • Suzanne Vallance

    (AgResearch, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand
    Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand)

  • Roxanne Henwood

    (AgResearch, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand)

Abstract

Herbicide resistance is increasingly recognised as a challenge for agricultural producers worldwide. International scholarship and practical experiences suggest that collective efforts by diverse agricultural stakeholders are crucial for effective resistance management. In New Zealand, such sector-wide initiatives and strategies remain fragmented, partly due to a lack of state coordination and national extension services. This article synthesises insights from three complementary social research methods involving actors across the country’s arable-crop-growing sector (focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and an industry workshop) to identify pathways to foster collaboration and more strategic resistance management. The presented findings detail challenges, opportunities, and potential actions across four domains: strengths and weaknesses of New Zealand’s farming context, better information and knowledge exchange, improved collaboration and coordination, and targeted education and training. Our analysis highlights that most opportunities described within these domains involve purposely strengthening existing, or forming new, social and institutional relationships as part of establishing resistance management as a shared sector responsibility. A portfolio of multipronged initiatives and programmes is then required for effective whole-industry strategies. We discuss potential next steps to collectively realise identified opportunities, from more immediately feasible steps to long-term activities. These insights conceptually contribute to the international scholarship on herbicide resistance by reinforcing the notion that industry leadership and meaningful farmer involvement are indispensable for more collaborative approaches aimed at strategically managing resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Espig & Suzanne Vallance & Roxanne Henwood, 2023. "Opportunities for Improving Herbicide Resistance Management Strategies across New Zealand’s Arable Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9119-:d:1164313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chrysanthi Charatsari & Evagelos D. Lioutas & Alex Koutsouris, 2020. "Farmer field schools and the co-creation of knowledge and innovation: the mediating role of social capital," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1139-1154, December.
    2. Kaitlyn Height & Sonia Graham & Rebecca Campbell & Gina Hawkes & Silja Schrader & Louise Blessington & Scott McKinnon, 2022. "Opportunities to Manage Herbicide Resistance through Area-Wide Management: Lessons from Australian Cropping Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Ervin, David E. & Breshears, Elise H. & Frisvold, George B. & Hurley, Terrance & Dentzman, Katherine E. & Gunsolus, Jeffrey L. & Jussaume, Raymond A. & Owen, Micheal D.K. & Norsworthy, Jason K. & Al M, 2019. "Farmer Attitudes Toward Cooperative Approaches to Herbicide Resistance Management: A Common Pool Ecosystem Service Challenge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 237-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine Dentzman, 2022. "Academics and the ‘easy button’: lessons from pesticide resistance management," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1179-1183, December.
    2. Chikwalila, Eric & Willinger, Marc & Farolfi, Stefano & Mungatana, Eric & Jourdain, Damien, 2023. "The impact of a scholarship programme on social capital formation among university students: An economic experiment at the University of Pretoria, South Africa," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(1), April.
    3. MICHAILIDIS Anastasios & LIVADIOTIS Anastasios & NIKOULI Smaragda & LAZARIDOU Dimitra & TSOUKALIDIS Ioannis & DALAMPIRA Evropi-Sofia, 2022. "Investigating Technology Transfer Gaps Through Farmers Field School," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    4. Katherine Dentzman & Ian Cristofer Burke, 2021. "Herbicide Resistance, Tillage, and Community Management in the Pacific Northwest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Zain, Majdah Muhyiddin & Ibrahim, Helda & Musdalifah, Musdalifah, 2022. "Knowledge sharing behavior among farmers in Indonesia: Does social capital matter?," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(10).
    7. Bakker, Teatske & Dugué, Patrick & de Tourdonnet, Stéphane, 2022. "How do farmers change their practices at the farm level after co-design processes in Farmer Field Schools?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Herbicide Resistance Tests in German Agriculture," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329587, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    9. Jennifer H. Allen & David E. Ervin & George B. Frisvold & James T. Brosnan & James D. McCurdy & Rebecca G. Bowling & Aaron J. Patton & Matthew T. Elmore & Travis W. Gannon & Lambert B. McCarty & Patri, 2022. "Herbicide-Resistance in Turf Systems: Insights and Options for Managing Complexity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Hennessy, David A. & Rault, Arnaud, 2023. "On systematically insufficient biosecurity actions and policies to manage infectious animal disease," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9119-:d:1164313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.