IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p581-d1018744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research of Glamping Tourism Based on the Aesthetics of Atmosphere

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Sun

    (Department of Tourism Management, School of Social Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Tai Huang

    (Department of Tourism Management, School of Social Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
    Academy of Culture and Tourism Research, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

Abstract

Glamping, with its pursuit of connection with nature and focus on refinement, inspires the dissemination of glamping scenes—A tourism phenomenon that has received little attention in the literature despite its popularity with travelers. This study views the aesthetics of atmosphere theory as a breakthrough, analyzing user-generated content and in-depth interviews to identify three dimensions—physical environment, situation, and context—that are complementary developments of the aesthetics of atmosphere theory. After clarifying the characteristics of the construction of glamping scenes, we further explore the path of sustainable development of glamping from online to offline communication through the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework. The results of grounded theory are used as stimulus and organism factors in the communication path and travel experience-sharing behavior and word-of-mouth recommendations are used as response factors. Research has revealed that physical environments and situational interactions play a decisive role in contextual perception and that unique organismic perception helps campers to respond positively to shared communication. The exploration of communication paths integrates atmospheric aesthetics theory and the SOR framework, contributing to the development of theory as well as suggesting ideas and references for the sustainable communication of glamping practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Sun & Tai Huang, 2022. "Research of Glamping Tourism Based on the Aesthetics of Atmosphere," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:581-:d:1018744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Yan Hong & Gangwei Cai & Zhoujin Mo & Weijun Gao & Lei Xu & Yuanxing Jiang & Jinming Jiang, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Tourist Satisfaction with B&B in Zhejiang, China: An Importance–Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Lee, Seunghyun & Ha, Sejin & Widdows, Richard, 2011. "Consumer responses to high-technology products: Product attributes, cognition, and emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1195-1200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    2. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    3. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    5. Tom Joerß & Payam Akbar & Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann, 2017. "Conceptualizing sustainability from a consumer perspective [Konzeptionalisierung der Nachhaltigkeit aus der Konsumentensicht]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 15-23, June.
    6. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    7. Monica C. LaBarge & Martin Pyle, 2020. "Staying in “the works of living”: How older adults employ marketplace resources to age successfully," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 742-774, June.
    8. Daisy Bertrand & Pierre-Yves Léo & Jean Philippe, 2019. "The New Go-Between Services: Peer-To-Peer Sharing Platforms In Hospitality Services," Post-Print hal-02299130, HAL.
    9. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter & Phillips, Richard, 2017. "‘Branching scenarios’ seeking articulated action for regional regeneration – A case study of limited success," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 189-202.
    10. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    11. Cooper, Holly B. & Ewing, Michael T. & Campbell, Colin & Treen, Emily, 2023. "Hero brands, brand heroes: How R.M. Williams inspired a cult following and created a shared sense of meaning," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 405-414.
    12. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-50.
    13. Shiqi Zhang & Tianwei Sun & Yuan Lu, 2023. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Tourists’ Risk Perceptions: Tourism Policies’ Mediating Role in Sustainable and Resilient Recovery in the New Normal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Jon Reast & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme & François Maon, 2010. "The Manchester Super Casino: Experience and Learning in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 197-218, July.
    15. Su, Lujun & Swanson, Scott R., 2017. "The effect of destination social responsibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: Compared analysis of first-time and repeat tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 308-321.
    16. Ziyed Guelmami & Lionel Sitz, 2015. "Combining phenomenology and sociology : the use of « consumer careers » as an objectivation tool for interpretive consumer research," Post-Print hal-03574801, HAL.
    17. Travis Tae Oh & Michel Tuan Pham, 2022. "A Liberating-Engagement Theory of Consumer Fun [Pleasure Principles: A Review of Research on Hedonic Consumption]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 46-73.
    18. Farquhar, Jillian Dawes & Panther, Tracy, 2008. "Acquiring and retaining customers in UK banks: An exploratory study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 9-21.
    19. Sami Jabarkhail, 2020. "Servant Leadership in the Context of Mosque: A Qualitative Case Study of Muslim Women’s Perspectives," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Serene Ho & Joep Crompvoets & Jantien Stoter, 2018. "3D Geo-Information Innovation in Europe’s Public Mapping Agencies: A Public Value Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    21. Shyh-Ming Huang & Shyh-Rong Fang & Shih-Chieh Fang & Chao-Chin Huang, 2016. "The influences of brand benefits on brand loyalty: Intermediate mechanisms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 141-160, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:581-:d:1018744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.