IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4662-d793183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Barriers of Green Innovation Implementation: Evidence from the Vietnamese Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Yung-Fu Huang

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

  • Abbott Po-Shun Chen

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

  • Manh-Hoang Do

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan
    Faculty of Economics, Tay Nguyen University, Buon Ma Thuot 63000, Vietnam)

  • Jen-Chieh Chung

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

Abstract

Sustainability concerns are rising as an interesting topic in both academia and industry. Many scholars revealed that green innovation is an excellent solution to enable organizations to achieve various benefits, such as enhancing their reputation and competitive advantages. Thus, this is the first study in Vietnam to consider the barriers to implementing green innovation. The research aims to identify the obstacles to green innovation practices in the Vietnamese manufacturing sector. The interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach has been conducted to provide the interactions among the green innovation implementation barriers. The authors ground this study to bridge the theoretical and practical for green innovation practices in the Vietnam situation. Based on the experts’ perspectives, they proposed that Vietnamese manufacturers must deal with thirteen essential barriers to green innovation adoption. Further, six interaction levels and the MICMAC analysis clarified cross-relationships among challenges by evaluating the driving and dependence power. Indeed, the empirical results emphasized that financial capability constraints and lack of government support are the most decisive challenges. In contrast, market competition and uncertainty concern is the easiest obstacle to address by the Vietnamese manufacturers. Therefore, this study has provided some insightful contributions for the top managers and other scholars to consider.

Suggested Citation

  • Yung-Fu Huang & Abbott Po-Shun Chen & Manh-Hoang Do & Jen-Chieh Chung, 2022. "Assessing the Barriers of Green Innovation Implementation: Evidence from the Vietnamese Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4662-:d:793183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4662/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4662/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasileios Rizos & Arno Behrens & Wytze Van der Gaast & Erwin Hofman & Anastasia Ioannou & Terri Kafyeke & Alexandros Flamos & Roberto Rinaldi & Sotiris Papadelis & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Corrado , 2016. "Implementation of Circular Economy Business Models by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Chien, Fengsheng & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Chau, Ka Yin & Iram, Robina, 2021. "Assessing the mechanism of barriers towards green finance and public spending in small and medium enterprises from developed countries," MPRA Paper 109668, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Qiang Xu & Lian Xu & Zaiyang Xie & Mufan Jin, 2021. "Does Business Group Matter for the Relationship between Green Innovation and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Jeremy Hall & Stelvia Matos & Vernon Bachor, 2019. "From green technology development to green innovation: inducing regulatory adoption of pathogen detection technology for sustainable forestry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 877-889, April.
    6. Dalia Fadly, 2020. "Greening Industry in Vietnam: Environmental Management Standards and Resource Efficiency in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Fengsheng Chien & Hafiz Waqas Kamran & Muhammad Atif Nawaz & Nguyen Ngoc Thach & Pham Dinh Long & Zulfiqar Ali Baloch, 2022. "Assessing the prioritization of barriers toward green innovation: small and medium enterprises Nexus," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1897-1927, February.
    8. Tobias Stucki, 2019. "What hampers green product innovation: the effect of experience," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 1242-1270, November.
    9. Lin, Woon Leong & Ho, Jo Ann & Sambasivan, Murali & Yip, Nick & Mohamed, Azali Bin, 2021. "Influence of green innovation strategy on brand value: The role of marketing capability and R&D intensity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Naim Ahmad & Ayman Qahmash, 2021. "SmartISM: Implementation and Assessment of Interpretive Structural Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Yung‐Fu Huang & Manh‐Hoang Do & Vimal Kumar, 2019. "Consumers' perception on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Vietnam," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1272-1284, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingyuan Yang & Shaorong Xu, 2022. "The Relationship between the Political Connections and Green Innovation Development of Chinese Enterprises—Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Chinese A-Share Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Abbott Po Shun Chen & Yung-Fu Huang & Manh-Hoang Do, 2022. "Exploring the Challenges to Adopt Green Initiatives to Supply Chain Management for Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yurong & Zhou, Pengfei & Zhang, Yiting & Shen, Yang, 2023. "Natural resources extraction and sustainable environment: COP26 perspective for China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Steffen Foldager Jensen & Jesper Hemdrup Kristensen & Jonas Nygaard Uhrenholt & Maria Camila Rincón & Sofie Adamsen & Brian Vejrum Waehrens, 2022. "Unlocking Barriers to Circular Economy: An ISM-Based Approach to Contextualizing Dependencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Analysing the roadblocks of circular economy adoption in the automobile sector: Reducing waste and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1051-1066, February.
    4. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    6. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2020. "A Hybrid Methodology to Study Stakeholder Cooperation in Circular Economy Waste Management of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    8. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jingru Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2023. "Mechanism of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the green development behavior of construction enterprises," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Howard, Mickey & Böhm, Steffen & Eatherley, Dan, 2022. "Systems resilience and SME multilevel challenges: A place-based conceptualization of the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 757-768.
    10. Leonidas Milios, 2021. "Towards a Circular Economy Taxation Framework: Expectations and Challenges of Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    11. Nguyen Thi Phuong Thu & Le Mai Huong & Vu Ngoc Xuan, 2022. "Factors Affecting Environmental Pollution for Sustainable Development Goals—Evidence from Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Jing Shao, 2019. "Sustainable consumption in China: New trends and research interests," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1507-1517, December.
    13. Shi Yin & Nan Zhang & Baizhou Li, 2020. "Improving the Effectiveness of Multi-Agent Cooperation for Green Manufacturing in China: A Theoretical Framework to Measure the Performance of Green Technology Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva & Francisco J. Sáez‐Martínez, 2022. "Closing the loop through eco‐innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2337-2350, July.
    15. Percy Marquina & Vincent Charles, 2021. "A Bayesian resampling approach to estimate the difference in effect sizes in consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1680-1699, November.
    16. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    17. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2022. "Leveraging Blockchain and Smart Contract Technologies to Overcome Circular Economy Implementation Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    18. McDougall, Natalie & Wagner, Beverly & MacBryde, Jill, 2022. "Competitive benefits & incentivisation at internal, supply chain & societal level circular operations in UK agri-food SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1149-1162.
    19. Gilbert Silvius & Aydan Ismayilova & Vicente Sales-Vivó & Micol Costi, 2021. "Exploring Barriers for Circularity in the EU Furniture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Gabi Försterling & Ronald Orth & Benjamin Gellert, 2023. "Transition to a Circular Economy in Europe through New Business Models: Barriers, Drivers, and Policy Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-40, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4662-:d:793183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.