IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3125-d766037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint of a Typical Neapolitan Pizzeria

Author

Listed:
  • Aniello Falciano

    (Department of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Alessio Cimini

    (Department of for Innovation in the Biological, Agrofood and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Paolo Masi

    (Department of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Mauro Moresi

    (Department of for Innovation in the Biological, Agrofood and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Neapolitan pizza is very popular worldwide and is registered on the traditional specialties guaranteed (TSG) list. This study was aimed at identifying the cradle-to-grave carbon footprint (CF) of a medium-sized pizza restaurant serving in situ or takeaway true Neapolitan pizzas conforming to the Publicly Available Specification (PAS) 2050 standard method. An average CF of ~4.69 kg CO 2e /diner was estimated, about 74% of which was due to the production of the ingredients used (with buffalo mozzarella cheese alone representing as much as 52% of CF). The contribution of beverages, packaging materials, transportation, and energy sources varied within 6.8 and 4.6% of CF. The percentage relative variation of CF with respect to its basic score was of about +26%, +4.4%, and +1.6% or +2.1%, provided that the emission factor of buffalo mozzarella, fresh cow mozzarella (fiordilatte), Grana Padano cheeses, and electricity varied by +50% with respect to each corresponding default value, respectively. The specific carbon footprint for Marinara pizza was equal to ~4 kg CO 2e /kg, while for Margherita pizza, it was up to 5.1, or 10.8 kg CO 2e /kg when topped with fresh cow or buffalo mozzarella cheese. To help pizza restaurant operators select the most rewarding mitigation strategy, we explored how CF was affected by more sustainable buffalo mozzarella cheese production, lighter and reusable containers for beer, mineral water, and main fresh vegetables, newer diesel-powered vans, less air-polluting electric ovens instead of traditional wood-fired ovens, as well as renewable electricity sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Aniello Falciano & Alessio Cimini & Paolo Masi & Mauro Moresi, 2022. "Carbon Footprint of a Typical Neapolitan Pizzeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3125-:d:766037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Demichelis & Francesco Piovano & Silvia Fiore, 2019. "Biowaste Management in Italy: Challenges and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Tricase, C. & Lombardi, M., 2009. "State of the art and prospects of Italian biogas production from animal sewage: Technical-economic considerations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 477-485.
    3. Shiv Prasad & Dhanya M S, 2011. "Air Quality and Biofuels," Chapters, in: Marco Aurelio Dos Santos Bernardes (ed.), Environmental Impact of Biofuels, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Troncoso-Pantoja & Paola Cáceres-Rodríguez & Antonio Amaya-Placencia & Claudia Lataste-Quintana & Rodrigo Valenzuela, 2023. "Exploring the Meanings of Food Sustainability: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prehoda, Emily W. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2017. "Potential lives saved by replacing coal with solar photovoltaic electricity production in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 710-715.
    2. Talibi, Midhat & Hellier, Paul & Ladommatos, Nicos, 2017. "Combustion and exhaust emission characteristics, and in-cylinder gas composition, of hydrogen enriched biogas mixtures in a diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 397-412.
    3. Mariarosaria Lombardi & Marco Costantino, 2021. "A Hierarchical Pyramid for Food Waste Based on a Social Innovation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Francis Auguste Fleury Junior Dima & Zifu Li & Heinz-Peter Mang & Lixin Zhu, 2022. "Feasibility Analysis of Biogas Production by Using GIS and Multicriteria Decision Aid Methods in the Central African Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Oniszk-Popławska, Anna & Matyka, Mariusz & Ryńska, Elżbieta Dagny, 2014. "Evaluation of a long-term potential for the development of agricultural biogas plants: A case study for the Lubelskie Province, Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 329-349.
    6. Laura Brenes-Peralta & María F. Jiménez-Morales & Rooel Campos-Rodríguez & Fabio De Menna & Matteo Vittuari, 2020. "Decision-Making Process in the Circular Economy: A Case Study on University Food Waste-to-Energy Actions in Latin America," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Fekadu Mosisa Wako & Gianmaria Pio & Ernesto Salzano, 2021. "Laminar Burning Velocity and Ignition Delay Time of Oxygenated Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Strzalka, Rafal & Schneider, Dietrich & Eicker, Ursula, 2017. "Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 801-820.
    9. Acheampong, Michael & Ertem, Funda Cansu & Kappler, Benjamin & Neubauer, Peter, 2017. "In pursuit of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 7: Will biofuels be reliable?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 927-937.
    10. Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo Camargo & de Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari & Micuanski, Viviane Cavaler & Azevedo, Ricardo Lessa, 2015. "Exploring possibilities of energy insertion from vinasse biogas in the energy matrix of Paraná State, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 300-305.
    11. Zubaryeva, Alyona & Zaccarelli, Nicola & Del Giudice, Cecilia & Zurlini, Giovanni, 2012. "Spatially explicit assessment of local biomass availability for distributed biogas production via anaerobic co-digestion – Mediterranean case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 261-270.
    12. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber & Liu, Xiaowei (Vivian), 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part I – Impacts on water, soil, and air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3140-3158.
    13. Ahmed, Tariq & Kumar, Prashant & Mottet, Laetitia, 2021. "Natural ventilation in warm climates: The challenges of thermal comfort, heatwave resilience and indoor air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Stürmer, Bernhard & Novakovits, Philipp & Luidolt, Alexander & Zweiler, Richard, 2019. "Potential of renewable methane by anaerobic digestion from existing plant stock – An economic reflection of an Austrian region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 920-929.
    15. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    16. Fabio G. Santeramo & Monica Delsignore & Enrica Imbert & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2023. "The Future of the EU Bioenergy Sector: Economic, Environmental, Social, and Legislative Challenges," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 17(1), pages 1-1–52, April.
    17. Furtado Amaral, Andre & Previtali, Daniele & Bassani, Andrea & Italiano, Cristina & Palella, Alessandra & Pino, Lidia & Vita, Antonio & Bozzano, Giulia & Pirola, Carlo & Manenti, Flavio, 2020. "Biogas beyond CHP: The HPC (heat, power & chemicals) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. P. Elaiyaraju & N. Partha, 2016. "Studies on biogas production by anaerobic process using agroindustrial wastes," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 73-82.
    19. Bartoli, Andrea & Hamelin, Lorie & Rozakis, Stelios & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Brandão, Miguel, 2019. "Coupling economic and GHG emission accounting models to evaluate the sustainability of biogas policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 133-148.
    20. Daniela Dias & António Pais Antunes & Oxana Tchepel, 2019. "Modelling of Emissions and Energy Use from Biofuel Fuelled Vehicles at Urban Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3125-:d:766037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.