IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3091-d765596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Family Interface in the Context of Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Lúcia Marôco

    (Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-663 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Fernanda Nogueira

    (Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-663 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Sónia P. Gonçalves

    (Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-663 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Isabel C. P. Marques

    (Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-663 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The literature on internal social responsibility, in which the work-family interface can be included, already has a robust tradition in scientific research. It is, therefore, important to systematize the path that has been taken and what the future may hold. This article aims to systematize the literature that simultaneously focuses on the work-family relationship and on the context of social responsibility and sustainability, with the purpose of mapping the research that has been produced on these intersections. A systematic review of the literature was conducted between the period 1968 and 2021. The search was performed on the SCOPUS database, and the analysis was conducted using the VOSviewer software, with 333 articles having been identified and subjected to a bibliometric and content analysis. As a result, 88 articles were analyzed in depth, focusing on the Work and Life Space dimension and the work-family relationship. The results indicate that corporate social responsibility has a positive effect on the work-family relationship, where an efficient balance between personal and professional life is often measured based on the adequacy of the adjustment of factors such as working hours and social and family commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Lúcia Marôco & Fernanda Nogueira & Sónia P. Gonçalves & Isabel C. P. Marques, 2022. "Work-Family Interface in the Context of Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3091-:d:765596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3091/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3091/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron D Arndt & Anusorn Singhapakdi & Vivian Tam, 2015. "Consumers as employees: the impact of social responsibility on quality of work life among Australian engineers," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 98-108, March.
    2. Kazunori Kobayashi & Gabriel Eweje & David Tappin, 2018. "Employee wellbeing and human sustainability: Perspectives of managers in large Japanese corporations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 801-810, November.
    3. Takao Kato & Naomi Kodama, 2018. "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Gender Diversity in the Workplace: Econometric Evidence from Japan," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 99-127, March.
    4. Singhapakdi, Anusorn & Lee, Dong-Jin & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Senasu, Kalayanee, 2015. "The impact of incongruity between an organization's CSR orientation and its employees' CSR orientation on employees' quality of work life," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 60-66.
    5. Zhang, Shihang & Moeckel, Rolf & Moreno, Ana Tsui & Shuai, Bin & Gao, Jie, 2020. "A work-life conflict perspective on telework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 51-68.
    6. Leonardo Reyes-Gonzalez & Claudia N. Gonzalez-Brambila & Francisco Veloso, 2016. "Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1171-1191, September.
    7. Joan Sorribes & Dolors Celma & Esther Martínez‐Garcia, 2021. "Sustainable human resources management in crisis contexts: Interaction of socially responsible labour practices for the wellbeing of employees," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 936-952, March.
    8. Masako Darrough & Heedong Kim & Emanuel Zur, 2019. "The Impact of Corporate Welfare Policy on Firm-Level Productivity: Evidence from Unemployment Insurance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 795-815, October.
    9. Cathy Sheehan & Tse Leng Tham & Peter Holland & Brian Cooper, 2019. "Psychological contract fulfilment, engagement and nurse professional turnover intention," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 2-16, January.
    10. Sarah E. Riforgiate & Michael W. Kramer, 2021. "The Nonprofit Assimilation Process and Work-Life Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Dean, Hartley, 2007. "Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work–life balance in a low-income neighbourhood," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3452, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Evans Asante Boadi & Zheng He & Josephine Bosompem & Christian Narh Opata & Eric Kofi Boadi, 2020. "Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its effects on internal outcomes," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9-10), pages 611-632, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Yi-Ping Chang & Hsiu-Hua Hu & Chih-Ming Lin, 2021. "Consistency or Hypocrisy? The Impact of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Behrooz Gharleghi & Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi & Khaled Nawaser, 2018. "The Outcomes of Corporate Social Responsibility to Employees: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Yokoyama, Izumi & Kodama, Naomi & Higuchi, Yoshio, 2019. "Effects of state-sponsored human capital investment on the selection of training type," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 40-49.
    7. Kamalesh Kumar & Giacomo Boesso & Rishtee Batra & Jun Yao, 2019. "Explicit and implicit corporate social responsibility: Differences in the approach to stakeholder engagement activities of U.S. and Japanese companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1121-1130, September.
    8. Aniela Balacescu & Aurelia Patrascu & Loredana Maria Paunescu, 2021. "Adaptability to Teleworking in European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 683-683, August.
    9. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić & Aleksandra S. Dragin & Tamara Jovanović & Milica Solarević & Olja Munitlak Ivanović & Vladimir Stojanović & Kristina Košić & Anđelija Ivkov Džigurski & Slavica Tomić & Mirosl, 2023. "Tourism Stakeholder Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia: The Perception of Hotel Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Jorge Sinval & M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee & João Marôco, 2020. "The Quality of Work Life Scale: Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1323-1351, November.
    12. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Kelly Z. Peng & Fang Lee Cooke & Xuhua Wei, 2023. "Managing minority employees in organizations in Asia Pacific: Towards a more inclusive workplace?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 877-902, September.
    14. Saeed, Abubakr, 2021. "The impact of employee friendly practices on dividend payments: Evidence from emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 592-605.
    15. Denis E. Matytsin & Valentin A. Dzedik & Galina A. Markeeva & Saglar B. Boldyreva, 2023. "“Smart” outsourcing in support of the humanization of entrepreneurship in the artificial intelligence economy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Muhammad Nadim & Mueen Aizaz Zafar, 2021. "Evaluation of Nurses’ Job Engagement as an Outcome of Experienced Compassion in the Workplace, Using the Lens of Affective Event Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    17. Lee, O-Joun & Jeon, Hyeon-Ju & Jung, Jason J., 2021. "Learning multi-resolution representations of research patterns in bibliographic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    18. Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Gabriele Giorgi & Dante Castillo Guajardo & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Special Issue “Rethinking the Subjective Wellbeing for a New Workplace Scenario”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-6, April.
    19. Tania Burchardt, 2008. "Time and Income Poverty," CASE Reports casereport57, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    20. Minh Hieu Nguyen & Jimmy Armoogum, 2021. "Perception and Preference for Home-Based Telework in the COVID-19 Era: A Gender-Based Analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3091-:d:765596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.