IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2331-d752462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of Supply Chain Transportation Pooling Strategy for Reducing CO 2 Emissions Using a Simulation-Based Methodology: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdessalem Jerbi

    (OLID Laboratory, Higher Institute of Industrial Management of Sfax (ISGIS), University of Sfax, Sfax 3021, Tunisia)

  • Haifa Jribi

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3018, Tunisia)

  • Awad M. Aljuaid

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wafik Hachicha

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Faouzi Masmoudi

    (LA2MP Laboratory, National Engineering School of Sfax (ENIS), University of Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia)

Abstract

One of the main concepts for improving the sustainability of supply chains is the collaboration between stakeholders by increasing the efficiency of their shared resources. In the literature, there are many research papers related to vertical collaboration in the logistics industry. However, horizontal collaboration has not received the same degree of attention. In fact, horizontal collaboration such as shared freight carrier and freight consolidation can also be considered vital for low-carbon supply chain solutions. In this paper, the problem of the design of supply chain transportation pooling strategies (SCTPS) is studied, which considers both vertical and horizontal collaboration. The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of these SCTPSs to reduce CO 2 emissions using discrete-event simulation (DES)-based methodology. Using a numerical case study of two manufacturing companies and three customers, five SCTPS are studied including the following: (1) non-pooling strategy; (2) multi-pick strategy; (3) multi-drop strategy; (4) central hub strategy; and (5) combined hub and multi-drop strategy. The main result of the study is that all SCTPSs significantly reduce the CO 2 emissions compared to the non-pooled supply chain. In fact, the reduction in CO 2 emissions can reach 13% compared to the non-pooled strategy. Moreover, the best SCTPS that gives the minimum of CO 2 is the hub strategy, followed by the multi-pick strategy and the multi-drop strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdessalem Jerbi & Haifa Jribi & Awad M. Aljuaid & Wafik Hachicha & Faouzi Masmoudi, 2022. "Design of Supply Chain Transportation Pooling Strategy for Reducing CO 2 Emissions Using a Simulation-Based Methodology: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2331-:d:752462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agostino Bruzzone & Francesco Longo, 2014. "An application methodology for logistics and transportation scenarios analysis and comparison within the retail supply chain," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 112-142.
    2. Hanan Ouhader & Malika El Kyal, 2017. "Combining Facility Location and Routing Decisions in Sustainable Urban Freight Distribution under Horizontal Collaboration: How Can Shippers Be Benefited?," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-18, July.
    3. Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot & Frédéric Fontane & Driss Hakimi, 2014. "Environmental and economic issues arising from the pooling of SMEs' supply chains: case study of the food industry in Western France," Post-Print hal-00733668, HAL.
    4. Chabot, Thomas & Bouchard, Florence & Legault-Michaud, Ariane & Renaud, Jacques & Coelho, Leandro C., 2018. "Service level, cost and environmental optimization of collaborative transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Patricio Gallardo & Rua Murray & Susan Krumdieck, 2021. "A Sequential Optimization-Simulation Approach for Planning the Transition to the Low Carbon Freight System with Case Study in the North Island of New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot & Frédéric Fontane, 2013. "The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from freight transport by pooling supply chains," Post-Print hal-00733678, HAL.
    7. Qinpeng Wang & Longfei He & Daozhi Zhao & Michele Lundy, 2018. "Diverse Schemes of Cost Pooling for Carbon-Reduction Outsourcing in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Bertha Maya Sopha & Athaya Islami Triasari & Lynette Cheah, 2021. "Sustainable Humanitarian Operations: Multi-Method Simulation for Large-Scale Evacuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Linh Nguyen Khanh Duong & Josephine Chong, 2020. "Supply chain collaboration in the presence of disruptions: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3488-3507, June.
    10. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2020. "Rejoinder on: Shared resources in collaborative vehicle routing," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 32-33, April.
    11. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2021. "Simulation-Based Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Sustainable Supply Chains—Re-Design in an Approach to Supply Chain Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Pan, Shenle & Ballot, Eric & Fontane, Frédéric, 2013. "The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from freight transport by pooling supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 86-94.
    13. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl & Sarah Wieser, 2021. "Assignment constraints in shared transportation services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 513-539, October.
    14. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2020. "Shared resources in collaborative vehicle routing," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    2. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2021. "The collaborative consistent vehicle routing problem with workload balance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 955-965.
    3. Thomas Hacardiaux & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez, 2022. "Assessing the benefits of horizontal cooperation for the various stages of the supply chain," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3901-3924, September.
    4. Saberi, Sara, 2018. "Sustainable, multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carrier through reduction in pollution stock," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 421-444.
    5. Bozorgi, Ali, 2016. "Multi-product inventory model for cold items with cost and emission consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 123-142.
    6. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Yi Zheng & Huchang Liao & Xue Yang, 2016. "Stochastic Pricing and Order Model with Transportation Mode Selection for Low-Carbon Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. De Moor, Bram J. & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2023. "Breaking truck dominance in supply chains: Proactive freight consolidation and modal split transport," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Jianming Yao, 2017. "Optimisation of one-stop delivery scheduling in online shopping based on the physical Internet," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 358-376, January.
    10. Zhao, Rui & Zhou, Xiao & Han, Jiaojie & Liu, Chengliang, 2016. "For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 262-274.
    11. Meng, Xiaoge & Yao, Zhong & Nie, Jiajia & Zhao, Yingxue & Li, Zenglu, 2018. "Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 224-230.
    12. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2021. "The Prisoners’ Dilemma in collaborative carriers’ request selection," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 73-87, March.
    13. Mrabti, Nassim & Hamani, Nadia & Boulaksil, Youssef & Amine Gargouri, Mohamed & Delahoche, Laurent, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization model for the problems of sustainable collaborative hub location and cost sharing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.
    15. Nchofoung, Tii N. & Asongu, Simplice A., 2022. "Effects of infrastructures on environmental quality contingent on trade openness and governance dynamics in Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 152-163.
    16. X.J. Wang & S.H. Choi, 2016. "Impacts of carbon emission reduction mechanisms on uncertain make-to-order manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(11), pages 3311-3328, June.
    17. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Tan, Tarkan, 2017. "Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 520-533.
    18. Zahra Sadat Hasanpour Jesri & Kourosh Eshghi & Majid Rafiee & Tom Van Woensel, 2022. "The Multi-Depot Traveling Purchaser Problem with Shared Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Eshragh, Ali, 2015. "A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning:A leanness-versus-greenness analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-190.
    20. Asghari, Mohammad & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S. Mohammad J., 2021. "Green vehicle routing problem: A state-of-the-art review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2331-:d:752462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.