IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2155-d748975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ecosystem Approach in Addressing Sustainable Development Goals through Citizen Science in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Mačiulienė

    (Faculty of Social Science, Arts and Humanities, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Eglė Butkevičienė

    (Faculty of Social Science, Arts and Humanities, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the ecosystem of citizen science development in Lithuania and its potential to address United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs). As citizen science is still in the early development stage in Lithuania, this case study is an example of ecosystem analysis in the period of early citizen science adoption. This article highlights the holistic analysis of the different components of this ecosystem, focusing on the three major dimensions at different levels—content, actors and processes. A conceptual model for the analysis of the citizen science ecosystem was developed based on the theoretical assumptions of Systems Theory and Service Science. The model was tested with empirical data. The empirical findings are based on 30 interviews with representatives of different stakeholder groups. Summarizing the analysis of the citizen science ecosystem in Lithuania and its potential for SDGs achievement, it can be stated that the first signs of a co-creative processes in the citizen science ecosystem have already emerged. Currently, in Lithuania, the main potential of citizen science concentrates on contributing to Goal #15: Life on Land, with some potential also for contributing to Goals #4, #10 and #11 and others. However, in order to use citizen science for addressing SDGs more comprehensively, there is a need for greater involvement of different stakeholders in citizen science, both in promoting citizen science activities and in ensuring data quality and that these activities are implemented in accordance with research ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Mačiulienė & Eglė Butkevičienė, 2022. "The Ecosystem Approach in Addressing Sustainable Development Goals through Citizen Science in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2155-:d:748975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaetano Mario Golinelli & Mauro Gatti, 2001. "The Firm as a Viable System," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, University of Milano-Bicocca, issue 2 Market-.
    2. Daniel Dörler & Steffen Fritz & Silke Voigt-Heucke & Florian Heigl, 2021. "Citizen Science and the Role in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-5, May.
    3. Teresa M. Harrison & Theresa A. Pardo & Meghan Cook, 2012. "Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Jackson, Mike C., 2001. "Critical systems thinking and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 233-244, January.
    5. Shogo Katoh & Rick (H.L.) Aalbers & Shintaro Sengoku, 2021. "Effects and Interactions of Researcher’s Motivation and Personality in Promoting Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Efraim Hernández-Orozco & Ivonne Lobos-Alva & Mario Cardenas-Vélez & David Purkey & Måns Nilsson & Piedad Martin, 2022. "The application of soft systems thinking in SDG interaction studies: a comparison between SDG interactions at national and subnational levels in Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8930-8964, June.
    2. Mauro Romanelli & Patrizia Gazzola & Daniele Grechi & Francesca Pollice, 2021. "Towards a sustainability‐oriented religious tourism," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 386-396, May.
    3. Budiarso & Utomo Sarjono Putro & Yos Sunitiyoso & Rachma Fitriati, 2022. "Constructing the collaborative Working Relationships in one of the Big Four Firms," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 679-709, October.
    4. Novie Andri Setianto & Donald Cameron & John B. Gaughan, 2014. "Identifying Archetypes of an Enhanced System Dynamics Causal Loop Diagram in Pursuit of Strategies to Improve Smallholder Beef Farming in Java, Indonesia," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 642-654, September.
    5. Sanja Seljan & Marina Viličić & Zvonimir Nevistić & Luka Dedić & Marina Grubišić & Iva Cibilić & Karlo Kević & Bastiaan van Loenen & Frederika Welle Donker & Charalampos Alexopoulos, 2022. "Open Data as a Condition for Smart Application Development: Assessing Access to Hospitals in Croatian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    6. M C Jackson, 2003. "Deeper complementarism: a brief response to Ulrich," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(11), pages 1225-1226, November.
    7. Yi Luo & Zhiwei Tang & Peiqi Fan, 2021. "Could Government Data Openness Enhance Urban Innovation Capability? An Evaluation Based on Multistage DID Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Zlatanović, Dejana, 2015. "Combined Use of Systems Methodologies in Creative Managing the Problem Situations: Key Features, Benefits and Challenges," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2015), Kotor, Montengero, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Kotor, Montengero, 10-11 September 2015, pages 19-26, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    9. Baskaran Venkatesh & R Velkennedy, 2023. "Formulation of citizen science approach for monitoring Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation for an Indian city," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 56-66, February.
    10. White, Leroy & Bourne, Humphrey, 2007. "Voices and values: Linking values with participation in OR/MS in public policy making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 588-603, October.
    11. Luke Houghton, 2013. "Why Can't We All Just Accommodate: A Soft Systems Methodology Application on Disagreeing Stakeholders," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 430-443, July.
    12. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    13. Margherita Paola Poto, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework for Complex Systems at the Crossroads of Food, Environment, Health, and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-10, November.
    14. Carin Venter & Roelien Goede, 2017. "The Use of Critical Systems Heuristics to Surface and Reconcile Users' Conflicting Visions for a Business Intelligence System," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 407-432, August.
    15. Silvio M. Brondoni, 2009. "Market-Driven Management, Competitive Customer Value and Global Networks," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, University of Milano-Bicocca, issue 1 Market-.
    16. Luke Houghton & Heather Stewart, 2017. "Using the ‘Engagement’ Model of Problem Solving to Assist Students in Capstone Learning," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 471-485, October.
    17. Luke Houghton & Larry Crump, 2016. "Temporal Events and Problem Structuring," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 324-340, May.
    18. White, Leroy, 2009. "Understanding problem structuring methods interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 823-833, December.
    19. Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2014. "The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 932-945.
    20. Barbara Scozzi & Nicola Bellantuono & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Managing Open Innovation in Urban Labs," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 857-874, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2155-:d:748975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.