IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p1971-d745510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Traditional and Indigenous Horse Breeds for Wider Intended Use: Case Study from Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Jernej Prišenk

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia)

  • Nina Filipič

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia)

  • Črtomir Rozman

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia)

  • Karmen Pažek

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia)

  • Jernej Turk

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia)

Abstract

In this work, a new multi-criteria model for the evaluation of traditional and indigenous horse breeds, the HORQUAL model, was developed by applying the DEX (Decision Expert) method. The idea for this study culminated from brainstorming among researchers who had the importance of conserving traditional and indigenous horse breeds in Slovenia and their universal uses (recreative and sport) in mind. The conservation of native domestic animal breeds is one of the important indicators of sustainable agricultural development in particular countries. Here, the assessment process considered the horse breeds in terms of lifestyle, expectations, requirements and experiences. The development process was based on the multi-criteria decision analysis approach, and it was applied to seven traditional and indigenous Slovenian horse breeds. The horse breeds were classified into four groups of breed ratings according to the chosen criteria. The horse breeds were categorised as follows: “does not correspond to the criteria”, “less correspondence with the criteria”, “corresponds to the criteria” and “completely corresponds to the criteria”. The results of the HORQUAL model clearly show that it is easier and more effective to choose the most suitable breeds for specific purposes (i.e., recreative/sport horses with the potential for breeding along with acceptable costs, favourable temperament and suitable price) as they can easily be analysed or compared with each other, according to the criteria chosen in this paper. The rating by group takes the criteria for the multi-attribute evaluation that were identified by an expert group into account and balances between the assessment of recreational and sports needs for riders and the life expectancy for breeders. Additionally, incorporating the Plus-minus-1 analysis proved to be a useful support tool to analyse the assessments and to further improve horse breeding plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Jernej Prišenk & Nina Filipič & Črtomir Rozman & Karmen Pažek & Jernej Turk, 2022. "Evaluation of Traditional and Indigenous Horse Breeds for Wider Intended Use: Case Study from Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1971-:d:745510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/1971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galli, Francesca & Carbone, Anna & Caswell, Julie A. & Sorrentino, Alessandro, 2011. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Assessing PDOs/PGIs: An Italian Pilot Study," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Hingley, Martin & Boone, Julie & Haley, Simon, 2010. "Local Food Marketing as a Development Opportunity for Small UK Agri-Food Businesses," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(3), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Mendelsohn, Robert, 2003. "The challenge of conserving indigenous domesticated animals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 501-510, July.
    4. Karmen Pažek & Jernej Prišenk & Simon Bukovski & Boris Prevolšek & Črtomir Rozman, 2020. "Multicriteria Assessment of the Quality of Waste Sorting Centers—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jernej Prišenk & Jernej Turk, 2022. "Assessment of Concept between Rural Development Challenges and Local Food Systems: A Combination between Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Econometric Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Visser, Jurriaan & Trienekens, Jacques & van Beek, Paul, 2013. "Opportunities for Local for Local Food Production: A case in the Dutch Fruit and Vegetables," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164758, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Borec, Andreja & Prišenk, Jernej, 2013. "Models Of Partnerships And Organisational Forms In Short Food Supply Chains In The Slovenian Mountains," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 60(2).
    4. Kyriakos Drivas & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation in the Relationship Between PDOs/PGIs and Trademarks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 585-595, June.
    5. Anderson, Simon & Centonze, Roberta, 2007. "Property Rights and the Management of Animal Genetic Resources," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1529-1541, September.
    6. Anna Kasprzyk & Alina Walenia, 2023. "Native Pig Breeds as a Source of Biodiversity—Breeding and Economic Aspects," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Visser, Jurriaan & Trienekens, Jacques & van Beek, Paul, 2013. "Opportunities for Local for Local Food Production A Case in the Dutch Fruit and Vegetables," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Halimani, T.E. & Muchadeyi, F.C. & Chimonyo, M. & Dzama, K., 2010. "Pig genetic resource conservation: The Southern African perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 944-951, March.
    9. Elena Vigan? & Gervasio Antonelli & Gian Italo Bischi & Fabio Tramontana, 2015. "Consumo e consumatori di prodotti alimentari nella societ? postmoderna," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 17(1), pages 59-80.
    10. Tobias Chilla & Benedikt Fink & Richard Balling & Simon Reitmeier & Karola Schober, 2020. "The EU Food Label ‘Protected Geographical Indication’: Economic Implications and Their Spatial Dimension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Deselnicu, Oana C. & Costanigro, Marco & Souza-Monteiro, Diogo M. & McFadden, Dawn Thilmany, 2013. "A Meta-Analysis of Geographical Indication Food Valuation Studies: What Drives the Premium for Origin-Based Labels?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Menger, Anna Katharina & Hamm, Ulrich, 2021. "Consumers' knowledge and perceptions of endangered livestock breeds: How wording influences conservation efforts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Zsófia Benedek & Imre Fertő & Viktória Szente, 2020. "The Multiplier Effects of Food Relocalization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Anderson, Simon & Centose, Roberta, 2006. "Property rights and the management of animal genetic resources: how to secure access to drylands resources for multiple users," CAPRi working papers 48, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Santucci, Fabio M. & Callieris, Roberta & Debs, Philippe, 2012. "International Fairs in the Modern Food Systems," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Rafael Celaya & Luis M. M. Ferreira & José M. Lorenzo & Noemí Echegaray & Santiago Crecente & Emma Serrano & Juan Busqué, 2022. "Livestock Management for the Delivery of Ecosystem Services in Fire-Prone Shrublands of Atlantic Iberia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2018. "Un?alternativa alla retorica della dimensione aziendale e degli IDE: sistemi agro-alimentari sostenibili di PMI ed internazionalizzazione endogena per mezzo delle indicazioni geografiche," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 27-42.
    18. Dele Raheem & Anu Holopainen & Jana Koegst & Maija Tulimaa & Moaadh Benkherouf, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability within the Nordic-Arctic Region’s Food System: Challenges and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Gervasio Antonelli & Gian Italo Bischi & Fabio Tramontana & Elena Vigan?, 2014. "Beyond a neoclassical consumer analysis in food choices," Working Papers 1410, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2014.
    20. Cătălin-Ioan CLIPA & Magdalena DANILEȚ & Anca-Maria CLIPA, 2017. "Country Of Origin Effect And Perception Of Romanian Consumers," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 3(1), pages 19-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1971-:d:745510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.