IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16006-d989286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Cao

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510257, China)

  • Yanlan Mei

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 480081, China
    Center for Service Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 480081, China)

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of a supply chain manufacturer’s fairness concern and risk aversion on the green supply chain and constructs a two-level green supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. It compares three models: the manufacturer is a risk-neutral and fair-neutral, the manufacturer is a risk-averse and fair-neutral, and the manufacturer is a risk-averse and fair-concerned decision maker. In three cases, this paper examines how the manufacturer’s risk aversion and fairness concerns the impact product green level, retail price, and the wholesale price in the green supply chain. Consumers are sensitive to pricing strategies and product green level. The results are as follows: the manufacturer’s risk aversion leads to an increase in the retailer’s profit, and the manufacturer’s profit decreases with the increase in the risk aversion coefficient. Second, when demand meets certain conditions and the manufacturer has advantageous fairness concerns, the manufacturer benefits from fairness concerns, the retailer’s profit decreases with the manufacturer’s fairness concerns coefficient, and the manufacturer’s risk aversion will lead to a decline in the product green level. Third, when the manufacturer believes that the risk is relatively large, they reduce the technology investment of green products; thus, the fairness concerns of the manufacturer will affect the investment of green products and increase the green level of products. For enterprises: When supply chain members face various risks, they need to consider the specific needs of consumers and other members’ behavioral preferences. They can put forward a more scientific prediction of market demand and rational decision making. For customers: they should not only pay attention to changes in market prices, but should also pay attention to changes in the behavioral preferences of supply chain members, as customers are in line with their own interests based on the choice of high-quality green production.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Cao & Yanlan Mei, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16006-:d:989286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Wenge & He, Yuanjie, 2017. "Green product design in supply chains under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 165-180.
    2. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    3. Wu, Meng & Zhu, Stuart X. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2014. "A risk-averse competitive newsvendor problem under the CVaR criterion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 13-23.
    4. Trkman, Peter & McCormack, Kevin, 2009. "Supply chain risk in turbulent environments--A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 247-258, June.
    5. Chunlin Luo & Xin Tian & Xiaobing Mao & Qiang Cai, 2018. "Coordinating Supply Chain with Buy-Back Contracts in the Presence of Risk Aversion," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(02), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Wenli Wang & Ruizhen Zhang, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Operations Decision and Government Subsidy Strategies under R & D Failure Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Di & Shen, Xinran & Yan, Xiaoyu & Wei, Wanying, 2018. "The impacts of distributional and peer-induced fairness concerns on the decision-making of order allocation in logistics service supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-122.
    8. Russo, Marianna & Kraft, Emil & Bertsch, Valentin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Short-term risk management of electricity retailers under rising shares of decentralized solar generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2007. "Fairness and Channel Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1303-1314, August.
    10. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Ma, Cheng & Shen, Bin & Sun, Qi, 2019. "Optimal pricing in mass customization supply chains with risk-averse agents and retail competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 150-161.
    11. Guan, Zhimin & Ye, Tong & Yin, Rui, 2020. "Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 916-930.
    12. Peng Ma & Kevin W. Li & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Pricing decisions in closed-loop supply chains with marketing effort and fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6710-6731, November.
    13. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Li, Jicai & Zhong, Yuanguang, 2018. "Cooperative advertising and ordering policies in a two-echelon supply chain with risk-averse agents," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 97-117.
    14. Wang, Limin & Song, Qiankun, 2020. "Pricing policies for dual-channel supply chain with green investment and sales effort under uncertain demand," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 79-93.
    15. Messinger, Paul R., 2016. "The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships: An experimental studyAuthor-Name: Choi, Sungchul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 798-813.
    16. Yu, Yugang & Han, Xiaoya & Hu, Guiping, 2016. "Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 397-408.
    17. Zhou, P. & Wen, Wen, 2020. "Carbon-constrained firm decisions: From business strategies to operations modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 1-15.
    18. Linghong Zhang & Hao Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Rui Lu, 2018. "The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Liu, Zhi & Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liao, Chen-Nan & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "A novel cooperative game-based method to coordinate a sustainable supply chain under psychological uncertainty in fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    4. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Shuiwang Zhang & Qianlan Ding & Jingcheng Ding, 2023. "Return Strategy of E-Commerce Platform Based on Green and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Qi Wang & Kebing Chen & Shengbin Wang & Xiaogang Cao, 2022. "Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 277-304, February.
    7. Dixit, Aasheesh & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kumar, Patanjal & Jakhar, Suresh K., 2024. "Roles of reciprocity and fairness concerns in airline-airport systems with environmental considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1011-1023.
    8. Wu, Jie & Xu, Guangcheng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhang, Chaochao, 2021. "Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Chen, Jianxin & Hou, Rui & Xiao, Lu & Zhang, Tonghua & Zhou, Yongwu, 2023. "Dynamic corporate social responsibility adjustment strategies of a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns and supply chain financing," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun & Perera, Sandun & Shi, Jim (Junmin), 2022. "Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Yan Ge & Jing Li, 2018. "Different Dominant Models and Fairness Concern of E-Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, December.
    12. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liu, Zhi & Jia, Fu & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Coordinating a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns through variable-weighted Shapley values," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 227-253.
    13. Hu, Xiaojian & Wang, Guanxiong & Li, Xiaozheng & Zhang, Yue & Feng, Shuai & Yang, Aifeng, 2018. "Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-95.
    14. Liu, Chao & Chen, Weidong, 2019. "Decision making in green supply chains under the impact of the stochastic and multiple-variable dependent reference point," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 443-469.
    15. Guan, Zhimin & Ye, Tong & Yin, Rui, 2020. "Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 916-930.
    16. Sarkar, Sumit, 2019. "Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: Models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 633-642.
    17. Zhi Liu & Xiao-Xue Zheng & Ben-Gang Gong & Yun-Miao Gui, 2017. "Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Huanyong Zhang & Zhen Zhang & Xujin Pu & Yuhang Li, 2019. "Green Manufacturing Strategy Considering Retailers’ Fairness Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Xiaogang Ma & Chunyu Bao & Jizi Li & Wandong Lou, 2022. "The impact of dual fairness concerns on bargaining game and its dynamic system stability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 357-382, November.
    20. Jia Liu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Dynamic Game Analysis on Cooperative Advertising Strategy in a Manufacturer-Led Supply Chain with Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16006-:d:989286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.