IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14962-d970507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking New Value from Urban Biowaste: LCA of the VALUEWASTE Biobased Products

Author

Listed:
  • David Fernández-Gutiérrez

    (Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Alejandra Argüelles

    (Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Gemma Castejón Martínez

    (Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • José M. Soriano Disla

    (Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Andrés J. Lara-Guillén

    (Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

The VALUEWASTE project can offer a sustainable solution to transform biowaste into added-value bioproducts, such as proteins from microorganisms and insects and biofertilizers. The present study focused on the environmental impacts linked to obtaining these bioproducts, which was performed by the standardized Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, using the Environmental Footprint methodology to evaluate the midpoint impact categories considered. At the same time, the bioproducts coming from biowaste were compared to regular ones: other protein sources and mineral fertilizers. The study results show that these new protein sources are firm candidates to reach the market from an environmental point of view. Furthermore, their environmental impacts could be improved by reducing the energy use (the main contributor) within some impact categories, such as ecotoxicity and global warming. In case of the biofertilizers, their environmental performance was overall worse compared to mineral fertilizers, except for the following impact categories: mineral and metal use and water scarcity. Nevertheless, these biofertilizers come from biowaste, extending the circularity concept, and from local places, reducing the dependency on other actors. Hence, the study showed that the obtained bioproducts are real alternatives to implement in a circular economy. However, continuous improvement of the solution should be performed.

Suggested Citation

  • David Fernández-Gutiérrez & Alejandra Argüelles & Gemma Castejón Martínez & José M. Soriano Disla & Andrés J. Lara-Guillén, 2022. "Unlocking New Value from Urban Biowaste: LCA of the VALUEWASTE Biobased Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14962-:d:970507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Rafiee, Shahin & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lindeneg, Susanne & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Ionut Minea, 2021. "Sustainable Alternative Routes versus Linear Economy and Resources Degradation in Eastern Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Fiala, Marco & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Lema, Juan M. & Moreira, María Teresa, 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 625-635.
    4. Tian, Hailin & Wang, Xiaonan & Lim, Ee Yang & Lee, Jonathan T.E. & Ee, Alvin W.L. & Zhang, Jingxin & Tong, Yen Wah, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of food waste to energy and resources: Centralized and decentralized anaerobic digestion with different downstream biogas utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    3. Gurunathan Manikandan & P. Rajesh Kanna & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota, 2023. "Review of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as a Feedstock for Biofuel—Indian Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Michele Moretti & Enrico Bocci, 2018. "Life Cycle Performance of Hydrogen Production via Agro-Industrial Residue Gasification—A Small Scale Power Plant Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Klara Ramm & Marzena Smol, 2023. "Water Reuse—Analysis of the Possibility of Using Reclaimed Water Depending on the Quality Class in the European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Auburger, Sebastian & Jacobs, Anna & Märländer, Bernward & Bahrs, Enno, 2016. "Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Tian, Hailin & Wang, Xiaonan & Lim, Ee Yang & Lee, Jonathan T.E. & Ee, Alvin W.L. & Zhang, Jingxin & Tong, Yen Wah, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of food waste to energy and resources: Centralized and decentralized anaerobic digestion with different downstream biogas utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Deng, Yawen & Ng Tsan Sheng, Adam & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "Authority-enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for the value-added treatment of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Amina Mohamed Ali & Md Alam Zahangir & Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif & Mohammed Saedi Jami & Jalludin Mohamed & Tarik Ainane, 2023. "Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Shakira R. Hobbs & Tyler M. Harris & William J. Barr & Amy E. Landis, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioplastics and Food Waste Disposal Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Fallahi, Alireza & Farzad, Somayeh & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Lam, Su Shiung & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Yujun Yuan & Tong Li & Qiang Zhai, 2020. "Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Garbage-Classification Based Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Comparative Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Abdelsalam, E. & Hijazi, O. & Samer, M. & Yacoub, I.H. & Ali, A.S. & Ahmed, R.H. & Bernhardt, H., 2019. "Life cycle assessment of the use of laser radiation in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 130-136.
    16. Poblete, Israel Bernardo S. & Araujo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic analysis of sustainable biogas-combined-cycle plant: Time-varying demand and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Yee Van Fan & Zorka Novak Pintarič & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2020. "Emerging Tools for Energy System Design Increasing Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Grosser, A. & Neczaj, E. & Jasinska, Anna & Celary, P., 2020. "The influence of grease trap sludge sterilization on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-997.
    20. Andreas Kiesel & Moritz Wagner & Iris Lewandowski, 2016. "Environmental Performance of Miscanthus, Switchgrass and Maize: Can C4 Perennials Increase the Sustainability of Biogas Production?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14962-:d:970507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.