IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14017-d955463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Thu Doan Ngoc Vuong

    (Becamex School of Business, Eastern International University, Binh Duong New City 75114, Binh Duong, Vietnam)

  • Loi Tan Nguyen

    (Becamex School of Business, Eastern International University, Binh Duong New City 75114, Binh Duong, Vietnam)

Abstract

Businesses must maintain their ability to adapt in order to remain competitive in today’s ever-evolving industry. They must collect and evaluate data continuously to make educated decisions and take appropriate measures. As a result, since the turn of the 20th century, managers’ preferred areas of interest have been connected to the achievement of their companies. This systematic review aimed to assess the most important methodologies for measuring employee performance in organizations. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) technique, the researchers carried out a systematic review on a specific topic. A thorough review of the literature was carried out, with a particular emphasis on articles, research papers, and other materials deemed relevant to the primary approaches for staff performance measurement and their associated factors and other relevant resources. The systematic review findings revealed that collaboration initiatives had positive and statistically significant standard-size effects on employee performance. The use of performance measurement attempts to identify the strengths and weaknesses of employees and to motivate them to improve their performance. Employee performance measurement demonstrates a favorable relationship between performance evaluation and employee inspiration. Performance evaluation schemes should be designed to provide a good treatment perspective of other teammates and the worker’s own aims.

Suggested Citation

  • Thu Doan Ngoc Vuong & Loi Tan Nguyen, 2022. "The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14017-:d:955463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shih‐Fang Lo, 2010. "Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 311-319, November.
    2. Chung-Fah Huang & Ho-Chi Lien, 2012. "An empirical analysis of the influences of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance of Taiwan’s construction industry: using corporate image as a mediator," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 263-275, February.
    3. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2019. "The Corporate Sustainability Strategy in Organisations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    5. Ipek Kazancoglu & Muhittin Sagnak & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu, 2021. "Circular economy and the policy: A framework for improving the corporate environmental management in supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 590-608, January.
    6. John Seddon & Carlton Brand, 2008. "Debate: Systems Thinking and Public Sector Performance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 7-9, February.
    7. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Christian Grund & Judith Przemeck, 2012. "Subjective performance appraisal and inequality aversion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(17), pages 2149-2155, June.
    9. Deborah de Lange & Timo Busch & Javier Delgado-Ceballos, 2012. "Sustaining Sustainability in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 151-156, October.
    10. Stefano Biazzo & Patrizia Garengo, 2012. "Performance Measurement with the Balanced Scorecard," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-24761-3, October.
    11. Huang, Kuo-En & Wu, Jih-Hwa & Lu, Shiau-Yun & Lin, Yi-Chia, 2016. "Innovation and technology creation effects on organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2187-2192.
    12. Kazi Nazmul Huda, Rashed Mahmud Shakil, Tamgid Ahmed Chowdhury, 2020. "Exploring the Significant Factors of Employee Performance Management System in Commercial Banks: A Multivariate Analysis," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 68-83, October.
    13. van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Schepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy: Part I: lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & David Zapletal, 2020. "The Role of Corporate Culture in Performance Measurement and Management Systems," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frida Betto & Alberto Sardi & Patrizia Garengo & Enrico Sorano, 2022. "The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Robin Hogrefe & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2023. "The Social Dimension of Corporate Sustainability: Review of an Evolving Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & David Zapletal, 2020. "The Role of Corporate Culture in Performance Measurement and Management Systems," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Marcel R. Sieber & Milan Malý & Radek Liška, 2022. "Conceptualizing organizational culture and business-IT alignment: a systematic literature review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Esneider Gutierrez-Rivera & Manuela Escobar-Sierra & Jorge-Andrés Polanco, 2023. "Characterizing Organizational Sustainability in Catholic Schools: A Cross-National Study Applying Text Mining," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    6. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    7. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    11. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    12. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    13. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    14. Xue-Ying Xu & Hong Kong & Rui-Xiang Song & Yu-Han Zhai & Xiao-Fei Wu & Wen-Si Ai & Hong-Bo Liu, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Biomarkers to Predict Hepatitis B-Related Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Vicente Miñana-Signes & Manuel Monfort-Pañego & Javier Valiente, 2021. "Teaching Back Health in the School Setting: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Nebojša Janićijević, 2013. "Matching Compensation System With The Type Of Organizational Culture," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 309-324, September.
    17. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    19. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    20. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14017-:d:955463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.