IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13255-d942973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Multi-Port Empty Container Repositioning under Uncertain Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyao Song

    (School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Xin Tang

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Chuanxu Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Changyan Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Junyi Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Empty container repositioning has always been an important problem faced by ports. In this paper, we study the multi-port empty container repositioning problem with the uncertainty of the demand and supply of empty containers in ports. First, we established an optimization model for empty container reposition strategies and calculated every port’s proportion, depending on its own empty container storage, on the operation of other ports and on the leasing company, in meeting the demand. Next, we established an optimization model for the empty container non-repositioning strategy, calculated the same proportions and compared their performance under two strategies. A two-stage particle swarm optimization (TS-PSO) algorithm was designed to solve the two models, and an example was used to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm and the rationality of the two models. Our research showed that the total cost of empty containers, storage costs, lease costs and the optimal storage of empty containers in ports under the repositioning strategy are all lower than those of the non-repositioning strategy. The proportion of the empty container demand met by inventory under the repositioning strategy is higher than that under the non-repositioning strategy, while the proportion of the empty container demand met by leasing is lower. The costs of leasing cost and repositioning empty containers are higher than those under the non-repositioning strategy. The increase in transportation time between ports per empty container mainly leads to the increase in the reposition costs of all ports. The increase in storage fees chiefly leads to the rising storage costs of all ports. The increase in leasing fees leads to the rising leasing costs of all ports. The paper provides a method for ports to decide the upper limit of empty container storage and to optimize their repositioning strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyao Song & Xin Tang & Chuanxu Wang & Changyan Xu & Junyi Wei, 2022. "Optimization of Multi-Port Empty Container Repositioning under Uncertain Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13255-:d:942973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarmadi, Kamran & Amiri-Aref, Mehdi & Dong, Jing-Xin & Hicks, Christian, 2020. "Integrated strategic and operational planning of dry port container networks in a stochastic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 132-164.
    2. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Pierre Dejax, 1993. "Dynamic and Stochastic Models for the Allocation of Empty Containers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 102-126, February.
    3. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    4. Alan L. Erera & Juan C. Morales & Martin Savelsbergh, 2009. "Robust Optimization for Empty Repositioning Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 468-483, April.
    5. Norberto Sáinz Bernat & Frederik Schulte & Stefan Voß & Jürgen Böse, 2016. "Empty Container Management at Ports Considering Pollution, Repair Options, and Street-Turns," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-13, December.
    6. Jeong, Yoonjea & Saha, Subrata & Chatterjee, Debajyoti & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2018. "Direct shipping service routes with an empty container management strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 123-142.
    7. Kim, Kap Hwan & Kim, Ki Young, 2007. "Optimal price schedules for storage of inbound containers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 892-905, October.
    8. Alfandari, Laurent & Davidović, Tatjana & Furini, Fabio & Ljubić, Ivana & Maraš, Vladislav & Martin, Sébastien, 2019. "Tighter MIP models for Barge Container Ship Routing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 38-54.
    9. Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Wencheng & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "Robust empty container repositioning considering foldable containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(3), pages 909-925.
    11. Li, Jing-An & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Wu, Yue & Liu, Ke, 2007. "Allocation of empty containers between multi-ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 400-412, October.
    12. Zhou, Yan & Chen, Shumei & Chen, Mei, 2019. "Global value chain, regional trade networks and Sino-EU FTA," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 26-38.
    13. Wennan Song & Di Liu & Wenyu Rong, 2022. "Optimization of Passenger-like Container Train Running Plan Considering Empty Container Dispatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Moon, Ilkyeong & Do Ngoc, Anh-Dung & Konings, Rob, 2013. "Foldable and standard containers in empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 107-124.
    15. Jula, Hossein & Chassiakos, Anastasios & Ioannou, Petros, 2006. "Port dynamic empty container reuse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 43-60, January.
    16. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    17. Shintani, Koichi & Konings, Rob & Imai, Akio, 2010. "The impact of foldable containers on container fleet management costs in hinterland transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 750-763, September.
    18. Choong, Sook Tying & Cole, Michael H. & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2002. "Empty container management for intermodal transportation networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-438, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaa Abdelshafie & May Salah & Tomaž Kramberger & Dejan Dragan, 2022. "Repositioning and Optimal Re-Allocation of Empty Containers: A Review of Methods, Models, and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "Empty container exchange among liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 158-169.
    3. Long, Yin & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2012. "The sample average approximation method for empty container repositioning with uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 65-75.
    4. Kuzmicz, Katarzyna Anna & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Approaches to empty container repositioning problems in the context of Eurasian intermodal transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 194-213.
    5. Jia Shu & Miao Song, 2014. "Dynamic Container Deployment: Two-Stage Robust Model, Complexity, and Computational Results," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 135-149, February.
    6. Bell, Michael G.H. & Liu, Xin & Rioult, Jeremy & Angeloudis, Panagiotis, 2013. "A cost-based maritime container assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 58-70.
    7. Yi Zhao & Qingwan Xue & Xi Zhang, 2018. "Stochastic Empty Container Repositioning Problem with CO 2 Emission Considerations for an Intermodal Transportation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Fan, Tijun & Pan, Qianlan & Pan, Fei & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Jingyi, 2020. "Intelligent logistics integration of internal and external transportation with separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Dessouky, Maged & Carvajal, Santiago & Yao, Siyuan, 2020. "Congestion Reduction Through Efficient Empty Container Movement Under Stochastic Demand," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt34c676k1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2021. "Pricing and quality setting strategy in maritime transportation: Considering empty repositioning and demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Song, Dong-Ping & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2012. "Cargo routing and empty container repositioning in multiple shipping service routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1556-1575.
    12. Hjortnaes, T. & Wiegmans, B. & Negenborn, R.R. & Zuidwijk, R.A. & Klijnhout, R., 2017. "Minimizing cost of empty container repositioning in port hinterlands, while taking repair operations into account," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 209-219.
    13. Myung, Young-Soo & Yu, Yung-Mok, 2020. "Freight transportation network model with bundling option," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Koichi Shintani & Rob Konings & Etsuko Nishimura & Akio Imai, 2020. "The impact of foldable containers on the cost of empty container relocation in the hinterland of seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 68-101, March.
    15. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Zhang, Fangjun, 2016. "Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-140.
    16. Kolar, Petr & Schramm, Hans-Joachim & Prockl, Günter, 2018. "Intermodal transport and repositioning of empty containers in Central and Eastern Europe hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 73-82.
    17. Jeong, Yoonjea & Kim, Gwang, 2023. "Reliable design of container shipping network with foldable container facility disruption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Yu, Mingzhu & Fransoo, Jan C. & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2018. "Detention decisions for empty containers in the hinterland transportation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-208.
    20. Xing, Xinjie & Drake, Paul R. & Song, Dongping & Zhou, Yang, 2019. "Tank Container Operators’ profit maximization through dynamic operations planning integrated with the quotation-booking process under multiple uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 924-946.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13255-:d:942973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.