IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13003-d939203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Supervisory Board Heterogeneity on Corporate Irregularity: New Insights and Management Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Jian Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

By structural equation modeling (SEM), this paper analyzes and explores the four Potential Characteristics of the supervisory board. They are: Individual Heterogeneity of the Supervisory Member (Internal Heterogeneity), Organization Size of the Supervisory Board (Organization Size), Structural Characteristics of the Supervisory Board (Structural Characteristics) and Identity Background of the Supervisory Board (Identity Background). Then, it constructs a path analysis and theoretical model of the influence of supervisory board heterogeneity on corporate irregularities, and verifies each influencing factor and observation index. The results show that individual factor Professional heterogeneity is the most effective indicator of Internal Heterogeneity, but such Internal Heterogeneity has a very limited effect on the occurrence of corporate irregularities. Organization Size has a significant impact on corporate misbehavior, and Number of people is an important factor in constructing Organization Size, yet the frequency of staff Turnover is not significant. Although the Average Age , Party Member Ratio , and Female Ratio can well conceptualize the Structural Characteristics, their effects on supervision performance are not obvious. Identity Background, including factors such as Average Education , Government / University Experience , or External Supervisors , does not improve supervisory performance and reduce the occurrence of irregularities. The above findings provide a foundation for further analysis and integration of multiple heterogeneous factors, as well as further study of the “combined effectiveness” of the supervisory board, and deeper investigation of the actual impact of the supervisory board on irregularities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Chen & Jian Xu, 2022. "The Role of Supervisory Board Heterogeneity on Corporate Irregularity: New Insights and Management Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13003-:d:939203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuming Ren & Lianqing Li & Yueqi Han & Yu Hao & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1656-1678, May.
    2. Ahmad Alkhataybeh & Safaa Adnan AlSmadi & Mohammad Ziad Shakhatreh & Mohammad A. Khataybeh, 2022. "Government Ownership and Corporate Cash Holdings: Empirical Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Fen Li & Cunyi Yang & Zhenghui Li & Pierre Failler, 2021. "Does Geopolitics Have an Impact on Energy Trade? Empirical Research on Emerging Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Runze Yang & Ruigang Zhang, 2022. "Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance and Corporate Performance: Evidence from China in the Perspective of Green Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Yu Hao & Jingwen Huang & Yunxia Guo & Haitao Wu & Siyu Ren, 2022. "Does the legacy of state planning put pressure on ecological efficiency? Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3100-3121, November.
    6. Chuck Huber, 2013. "Generalized structural equation modeling in Stata," Italian Stata Users' Group Meetings 2013 06, Stata Users Group.
    7. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu, 2020. "How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Bassen, A. & Schiereck, D. & Thamm, C., 2016. "Activist Shareholders and the Duration of Supervisory Board Membership: Evidence for the German Aufsichtsrat," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 85061, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Xiaodong Yang & Jianlong Wang & Jianhong Cao & Siyu Ren & Qiying Ran & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The spatial spillover effect of urban sprawl and fiscal decentralization on air pollution: evidence from 269 cities in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 847-875, August.
    10. Agrawal, Anup & Chadha, Sahiba, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 371-406, October.
    11. Bernard Black & Woochan Kim & Julia Nasev, 2021. "The Effect of Board Structure on Firm Disclosure and Behavior: A Case Study of Korea and a Comparison of Research Designs," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 328-376, June.
    12. Ronald C. Anderson & David M. Reeb & Arun Upadhyay & Wanli Zhao, 2011. "The Economics of Director Heterogeneity," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 40(1), pages 5-38, March.
    13. Kok, Seng Kiong & Giorgioni, Gianluigi & Farquhar, Stuart, 2022. "The trade-off between knowledge accumulation and independence: The case of the Shariah supervisory board within the Shariah governance and firm performance nexus," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Dominik Dienes & Patrick Velte, 2016. "The Impact of Supervisory Board Composition on CSR Reporting. Evidence from the German Two-Tier System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Li, Zhenghui & Yang, Cunyi & Huang, Zhehao, 2022. "How does the fintech sector react to signals from central bank digital currencies?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    16. Yaya Su & Zhenghui Li & Cunyi Yang, 2021. "Spatial Interaction Spillover Effects between Digital Financial Technology and Urban Ecological Efficiency in China: An Empirical Study Based on Spatial Simultaneous Equations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Mikko Manner, 2010. "The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 53-72, June.
    18. Charles E. Eesley & David H. Hsu & Edward B. Roberts, 2014. "The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1798-1817, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuai Wang & Cunyi Yang & Zhenghui Li, 2022. "Green Total Factor Productivity Growth: Policy-Guided or Market-Driven?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Yujian Jin & Lihong Yu & Yan Wang, 2022. "Green Total Factor Productivity and Its Saving Effect on the Green Factor in China’s Strategic Minerals Industry from 1998–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Zhuoxi Yu & Yu Wu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Patricia Crifo & Elena Escrig-Olmedo & Nicolas Mottis, 2019. "Corporate Governance as a Key Driver of Corporate Sustainability in France: The Role of Board Members and Investor Relations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1127-1146, November.
    5. Yu, Zhen & Shen, Yiran & Jiang, Shengjun, 2022. "The effects of corporate governance uncertainty on state-owned enterprises' green innovation in China: Perspective from the participation of non-state-owned shareholders," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Razzaq, Asif & Yang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Digital finance and green growth in China: Appraising inclusive digital finance using web crawler technology and big data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Limei Yin & Jia Liu, 2023. "Impact of Environmental Economic Transformation Based on Sustainable Development on Financial Eco-Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Qiangyi Li & Lan Yang & Fangxin Jiang & Yangqing Liu & Chenyang Guo & Shuya Han, 2022. "Distribution Characteristics, Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of the Water-Energy-Land-Food Nexus: A Case Study of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Huang, Haijie & Lee, Edward & Lyu, Changjiang & Zhu, Zhenmei, 2016. "The effect of accounting academics in the boardroom on the value relevance of financial reporting information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 18-30.
    10. Nemmara K. Chidambaran & Yun Liu & Nagpurnanand Prabhala, 2022. "Director diversity and inclusion: At the table but in the game?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 193-225, March.
    11. Tinghui Li & Jiehua Ma & Bin Mo, 2021. "Does Environmental Policy Affect Green Total Factor Productivity? Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s Air Pollution Control and Prevention Action Plan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Hao, Xiaoli & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2023. "How to improve environment, resources and economic efficiency in the digital era?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Berger, Allen N. & Kick, Thomas & Koetter, Michael & Schaeck, Klaus, 2013. "Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2087-2105.
    14. Adams, Mike & Jiang, Wei, 2016. "Do outside directors influence the financial performance of risk-trading firms? Evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 36-51.
    15. Sa Xu & Cunyi Yang & Zhehao Huang & Pierre Failler, 2022. "Interaction between Digital Economy and Environmental Pollution: New Evidence from a Spatial Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Fei Chen & Guotong Qiao & Na Wang & Dandan Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Influence of Population Urbanization on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Remeasuring in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Chai, Jingxia & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2022. "Planned economic growth and controlled energy demand: How do regional growth targets affect energy consumption in China?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Roberto Fernández‐Gago & Laura Cabeza‐García & Mariano Nieto, 2018. "Independent directors' background and CSR disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 991-1001, September.
    19. Runze Yang & Ruigang Zhang, 2022. "Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance and Corporate Performance: Evidence from China in the Perspective of Green Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Rania Beji & Ouidad Yousfi & Nadia Loukil & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 133-155, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13003-:d:939203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.