IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p12953-d938393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexus between Environmental Consciousness and Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Circular Textile Products in India: A Moderated-Mediation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mushahid Ali Shamsi

    (Department of Commerce, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India)

  • Asiya Chaudhary

    (Department of Commerce, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India)

  • Imran Anwar

    (University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India)

  • Rajarshi Dasgupta

    (Integrated Sustainability Centre (ISC), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Minato City 240-0115, Japan)

  • Sachin Sharma

    (IPE Global Ltd New Delhi, New Delhi 110024, India)

Abstract

The textile industry has witnessed rapid growth due to fast fashion and the growing use of textile products, resulting in terribly increasing textile waste and biodiversity and humans. Therefore, a shift from a linear paradigm (take-make-use-discard) to a circular model of textiles production (take-make-use-recycle-remanufacture-reuse) is urgently required. Still, it can only be successful if consumers accept circular textile products (CTP). Hence, the study assesses the direct and indirect (via perceived risks and perceived benefits) influence of environmental consciousness on purchase intention. Moreover, the study also attempts to check the moderating role of product knowledge on the direct links between perceived risks, perceived benefits, and purchase intention such that the indirect effects of environmental consciousness (via perceived risks and perceived benefits) on purchase intention are conditioned at low/high levels of product knowledge. Collecting a sample of 409 respondents from the National Capital Region (NCR) and Aligarh in India, we used SEM to test the direct and indirect effects, while model-14 in Process Macro was used to measure conditional indirect effects. The results show that environmental consciousness directly influences purchase intention and perceived risks, and perceived benefits partially mediate the direct link between environmental consciousness and purchase intention. Further, product knowledge conditionally moderates the indirect effect of EC on PI (via perceived risks and perceived benefits) such that the mediating effects of perceived risks and perceived benefits significantly vary at low/high levels of product knowledge. The findings direct retail managers and decision-making bodies in the Indian textile industry to frame focused strategies for reducing textile waste and protecting the environment by developing bylaws in favor of circular economy and CTP.

Suggested Citation

  • Mushahid Ali Shamsi & Asiya Chaudhary & Imran Anwar & Rajarshi Dasgupta & Sachin Sharma, 2022. "Nexus between Environmental Consciousness and Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Circular Textile Products in India: A Moderated-Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:12953-:d:938393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/12953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/12953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jena, Sarat Kumar & Sarmah, S.P., 2016. "Price and service co-opetiton under uncertain demand and condition of used items in a remanufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-21.
    2. Kumar, Anil & Prakash, Gyan & Kumar, Gaurav, 2021. "Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Céline Michaud & Daniel Llerena, 2011. "Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 408-420, September.
    4. Mitsutaka Matsumoto & Kenichiro Chinen & Hideki Endo, 2017. "Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Consumers’ Perceptions of Remanufactured Auto Parts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(4), pages 966-979, August.
    5. Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Feng Yang & Jun Li & Jian Song, 2020. "Determinants of consumers’ remanufactured products purchase intentions: Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 2368-2383, April.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 489-500, May.
    7. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Green Consumers in the 1990s: Profile and Implications for Advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 217-231, July.
    8. Chang, En-Chi & Tseng, Ya-Fen, 2013. "Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 864-870.
    9. Céline Michaud & Daniel Llerena, 2011. "Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products," Post-Print hal-01809083, HAL.
    10. Melissa Monika Wagner & Tincuta Heinzel, 2020. "Human Perceptions of Recycled Textiles and Circular Fashion: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Bolton, Ruth N & Drew, James H, 1991. "A Multistage Model of Customers' Assessments of Service Quality and Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 375-384, March.
    12. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    13. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Overstreet, Robert E. & Jones-Farmer, L. Allison & Field, Hubert S., 2012. "The role of ambiguity tolerance in consumer perception of remanufactured products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 781-790.
    14. Guiso, Luigi & Pagel, Michaela, 2004. "The Role of Risk Aversion in Predicting Individual Behaviours," CEPR Discussion Papers 4591, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Deepak Singhal & Sarat Kumar Jena & Sushanta Tripathy, 2019. "Factors influencing the purchase intention of consumers towards remanufactured products: a systematic review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(23), pages 7289-7299, December.
    16. Krittinee Nuttavuthisit & John Thøgersen, 2017. "The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 323-337, January.
    17. Grewal, Dhruv & Gotlieb, Jerry & Marmorstein, Howard, 1994. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 145-153, June.
    18. Inhwa Kim & Hye Jung Jung & Yuri Lee, 2021. "Consumers’ Value and Risk Perceptions of Circular Fashion: Comparison between Secondhand, Upcycled, and Recycled Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Wei Zhang & Linhui Sun & Xinping Wang & Anbo Wu, 2022. "The influence of AI word‐of‐mouth system on consumers' purchase behaviour: The mediating effect of risk perception," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 516-530, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iacopo Odoardi & Chiara Burlina & Alessandro Crociata, 2023. "Pro-Environmental Determinants of Waste Separation: Does the Interaction of Human and Social Capital Matter? Evidence from Italian Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Rajesh Bahl & Tarun Panwar & Rajiv Padhye & Rajkishore Nayak, 2023. "Are Australian Consumers Ready to Wear Recycled Clothing to Practice Sustainable Consumption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Budiana Ruslan & Erna Maulina & Rusdin Tahir & Rivani & R. Anang Muftiadi, 2023. "Sustainable Consumer Behavior: Bibliometric Analysis for Future Research Direction in Muslim Fashion Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Mushahid Ali Shamsi & Imran Anwar & Asiya Chaudhary & Samreen Akhtar & Alam Ahmad, 2023. "Sustainable Transition through Circular Textile Products: An Empirical Study of Consumers’ Acceptance in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Florin Vaduva & Luiela Magdalena Csorba & Dan-Cristian Dabija & George Lăzăroiu, 2024. "The Impact of Public Policies and Civil Society on the Sustainable Behavior of Romanian Consumers of Electrical and Electronic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mushahid Ali Shamsi & Imran Anwar & Asiya Chaudhary & Samreen Akhtar & Alam Ahmad, 2023. "Sustainable Transition through Circular Textile Products: An Empirical Study of Consumers’ Acceptance in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Wang, Yacan & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2016. "Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 460-469.
    3. Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Dutordoir, Marie, 2020. "Mapping the market for remanufacturing: An application of “Big Data” analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Wang, Yacan & Zhu, Quan & Krikke, Harold & Hazen, Benjamin, 2020. "How product and process knowledge enable consumer switching to remanufactured laptop computers in circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Seoyoon Lee & Minjung Kwak, 2020. "Consumer Valuation of Remanufactured Products: A Comparative Study of Product Categories and Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Alencar Bravo & Darli Vieira & Thais Ayres Rebello, 2022. "The Origins, Evolution, Current State, and Future of Green Products and Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Feng Yang & Yu Wang & Jun Li, 2018. "Consumer familiarity, ambiguity tolerance, and purchase behavior toward remanufactured products: The implications for remanufacturers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1741-1750, December.
    8. Leonidas Milios & Mitsutaka Matsumoto, 2019. "Consumer Perception of Remanufactured Automotive Parts and Policy Implications for Transitioning to a Circular Economy in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Du, Hang & Wei, Lai & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Competition of consumables’ original brand manufacturers and remanufacturers considering the entry of compatible manufacturers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 679-692.
    10. Kadri G Yilmaz & Sedat Belbag, 2016. "Prediction of Consumer Behavior Regarding Purchasing Remanufactured Products: A Logistics Regression Model," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, February.
    11. Barbara Bigliardi & Domenico Campisi & Giovanna Ferraro & Serena Filippelli & Francesco Galati & Alberto Petroni, 2020. "The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    12. I. Gåvertsson & L. Milios & C. Dalhammar, 2020. "Quality Labelling for Re-used ICT Equipment to Support Consumer Choice in the Circular Economy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 353-377, June.
    13. Kenichiro Chinen & Mitsutaka Matsumoto, 2021. "Indonesians’ Perceptions of Auto Parts Remanufactured in China: Implications for Global Remanufacturing Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Nitika Sharma & Raiswa Saha & V. Raja Sreedharan & Justin Paul, 2020. "Relating the role of green self‐concepts and identity on green purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3203-3219, December.
    15. Cristina Calvo-Porral & Jean-Pierre Lévy-Mangin, 2020. "The Circular Economy Business Model: Examining Consumers’ Acceptance of Recycled Goods," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Nika Hein, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Purchase Intention for Recycled Products: Integrating Perceived Risk into Value-Belief-Norm Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Daan Kabel & Mattias Elg & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Purchasing Behaviour of Remanufactured Robotic Lawn Mowers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Adnan Butt, 2017. "Determinants of the Consumers Green Purchase Intention in Developing Countries," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 4(2), pages 217-236, October.
    19. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2015. "Reprint of “Supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 94-108.
    20. Tully, Stephanie M. & Winer, Russell S., 2014. "The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 255-274.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:12953-:d:938393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.