IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p560-d718060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Bioeconomy in the Future Energy Scenario: A State-of-the-Art Review

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Perišić

    (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kraljice Marije 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ernest Barceló

    (Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Helsinki, Finland
    Omya International AG, Baslerstrasse 42, 4665 Oftringen, Switzerland)

  • Katarina Dimic-Misic

    (Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Monireh Imani

    (Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Vesna Spasojević Brkić

    (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kraljice Marije 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The bioeconomy aims at decreasing reliance on fossil fuels, preventing or reducing climate change, eliminating insecurity, and efficiently using resources; however, fierce controversy exists on conceivable pathways to accomplish these objectives. The transport sector alone, which encompasses all other industrial sectors, has grown with regard to its energy demand by 50% over the past 30 years. The aim of this paper is to promote a dialogue as to whether an economy based on biomass can be more sustainable than today’s existing economies, considering that the economy needs to expand and be boosted, while creating a cascading and recycling system. This semi-systematic review paper discusses four research questions based on findings from the last 20 years: (i) What are the crucial issues in the ongoing debate on the development of a sustainable bioeconomy concept? (ii) Where are the major conflicting points and focuses? (iii) How does the bioeconomy follow current urbanization and land-abandonment trends? (iv) How will the crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic change these previous scenarios? As it is not easy to currently predict which pathway will be the most effective, whether it be the one taken as of now or a specific novel pathway, this article recommends following a strategy that is diverse regarding its approaches to shaping the bioeconomy and further funding of renewable energy sources, along with the involvement of urban planning. In addition, conclusions are validated through a questionnaire completed by 51 experts in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Perišić & Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimic-Misic & Monireh Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić, 2022. "The Role of Bioeconomy in the Future Energy Scenario: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:560-:d:718060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Peng, Zhenwei & Feng, Yifu, 2017. "Planning community energy system in the industry 4.0 era: Achievements, challenges and a potential solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 710-721.
    2. Raphaëlle Stewart & Monia Niero, 2018. "Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast‐moving consumer goods sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1005-1022, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lubov Petrichenko & Antans Sauhats & Illia Diahovchenko & Irina Segeda, 2022. "Economic Viability of Energy Communities versus Distributed Prosumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Santos Júnior, Edvaldo Pereira & Silva, Magno Vamberto Batista da & Simioni, Flávio José & Rotella Junior, Paulo & Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar & Coelho Junior, Luiz Moreira, 2022. "Location and concentration of the forest bioelectricity supply in Brazil: A space-time analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 710-719.
    4. Fatih Selimefendigil & Ceylin Şirin & Hakan F. Öztop, 2022. "Experimental Performance Analysis of a Solar Desalination System Modified with Natural Dolomite Powder Integrated Latent Heat Thermal Storage Unit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Md Sumon Reza & Zhanar Baktybaevna Iskakova & Shammya Afroze & Kairat Kuterbekov & Asset Kabyshev & Kenzhebatyr Zh. Bekmyrza & Marzhan M. Kubenova & Muhammad Saifullah Abu Bakar & Abul K. Azad & Hrido, 2023. "Influence of Catalyst on the Yield and Quality of Bio-Oil for the Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-39, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tina Wiegand & Martin Wynn, 2023. "Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Digitalisation in the German Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Pina Puntillo & Carmela Gulluscio & Donald Huisingh & Stefania Veltri, 2021. "Reevaluating waste as a resource under a circular economy approach from a system perspective: Findings from a case study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 968-984, February.
    4. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    5. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Christof Falkenberg & Carina Schneeberger & Siegfried Pöchtrager, 2023. "Is Sustainability Reporting Promoting a Circular Economy? Analysis of Companies’ Sustainability Reports in the Agri-Food Sector in the Scope of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and EU Taxo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Castro-Lopez, Adrian & Iglesias, Victor & Santos-Vijande, María Leticia, 2023. "Organizational capabilities and institutional pressures in the adoption of circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Mariachiara Colucci & Alessandra Vecchi, 2021. "Close the loop: Evidence on the implementation of the circular economy from the Italian fashion industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 856-873, February.
    9. Sabina Scarpellini & Jesus Valero‐Gil & José M. Moneva & Michele Andreaus, 2020. "Environmental management capabilities for a “circular eco‐innovation”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1850-1864, July.
    10. Hana Trollman & James Colwill & Alan Brejnholt, 2020. "Ecologically Embedded Design in Manufacturing: Legitimation within Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Simona Fortunati & Laura Martiniello & Donato Morea, 2020. "The Strategic Role of the Corporate Social Responsibility and Circular Economy in the Cosmetic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    12. José M. Moneva & Sabina Scarpellini & Alfonso Aranda‐Usón & Igor Alvarez Etxeberria, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in view of the European sustainable finance taxonomy: Is the financial sector ready to disclose circular economy?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1336-1347, May.
    13. Sabina Scarpellini, 2022. "Social impacts of a circular business model: An approach from a sustainability accounting and reporting perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 646-656, May.
    14. Julia Romano Sanches & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Camila Gonçalves Castro & Roberta Souza Piao & Henrique Rozenfeld & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Katherine Mansilla-Obando & Fabiola Jeldes-Delgado & Nataly Guiñez-Cabrera, 2022. "Circular Economy Strategies with Social Implications: Findings from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. L'Abate, Vitiana & Raimo, Nicola & Vitolla, Filippo, 2023. "Circular Economy Disclosure through Social Media: An Empirical Analysis on Twitter," EconStor Conference Papers 279493, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Alfonso Aranda-Usón & Pilar Portillo-Tarragona & Luz María Marín-Vinuesa & Sabina Scarpellini, 2019. "Financial Resources for the Circular Economy: A Perspective from Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Raysa Geaquinto Rocha & Arminda do Paço & Helena Alves & Pedro Dinis Gaspar, 2023. "The Portuguese Circular Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Experts Advice on How to Overcome the Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Singh, Kuljeet & Hachem-Vermette, Caroline, 2021. "Economical energy resource planning to promote sustainable urban design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    20. Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Zacharis, Evan, 2019. "Optimisation framework for the design and operation of open-market urban and remote community microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:560-:d:718060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.