IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11470-d913780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Framework of Public Participation Utilization for Sustainable Urban Planning in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Saleh Bouregh

    (College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

There is a growing concern for people to contribute to future developments in shaping their surroundings (town, community, and region) and, thus, their quality of life. Therefore, the study aims to propose a framework of public-participation exploitation for sustainable urban planning in Saudi Arabia. The framework proposed was developed based on analyzing the literature review and experts’ opinions through the Delphi technique. The framework covers planning levels and stages, participation methods, sustainability pillars, and the use of information communication technology (ICT). A proposed PP framework is produced, which is comprehensive, yet tailored for the urban-planning context of Saudi Arabia. The framework assists the management of PP properly. It addresses several practical elements that involve the citizens’ awareness regarding PP in the planning process, along with the accessibility of the populace to urban-planning issues. The framework shows that there is no single participatory technique that can satisfy all planning processes. The framework recognizes the importance of integrating sustainability into urban plans. It is concluded that the current framework helps to manage public participation properly and introduces the participants in the planning process, which eventually affects the urban planning of cities in Saudi Arabia.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Saleh Bouregh, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of Public Participation Utilization for Sustainable Urban Planning in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11470-:d:913780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred Saunders & Michael Gilek & Anda Ikauniece & Ralph Voma Tafon & Kira Gee & Jacek Zaucha, 2020. "Theorizing Social Sustainability and Justice in Marine Spatial Planning: Democracy, Diversity, and Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Huan Yang & Ling Qiu & Xin Fu, 2021. "Toward Cultural Heritage Sustainability through Participatory Planning Based on Investigation of the Value Perceptions and Preservation Attitudes: Qing Mu Chuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. David Le Blanc, 2020. "E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends," Working Papers 163, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    4. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Sarbast Moslem & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke & Szabolcs Duleba, 2019. "Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Naji Akbar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Adel Saleh Bouregh, 2020. "Fostering Urban Sustainability through the Ecological Wisdom of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Kevin C. Desouza & Akshay Bhagwatwar, 2014. "Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 25-50, October.
    8. Richard Cowell, 2013. "The Greenest Government Ever? Planning and Sustainability in England after the May 2010 Elections," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 27-44, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Naji Akbar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Ayesha Agha Shah & Wafa Al-Madani, 2021. "Ecological Embeddedness in the Maya Built Environment: Inspiration for Contemporary Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Faisal AlShareef & Mohammed Aljoufie, 2020. "Identification of the Proper Criteria Set for Neighborhood Walkability Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model: A Case Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Hüseyin Gökçekuş & Farhad Bolouri, 2023. "Transboundary Waters and Their Status in Today’s Water-Scarce World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Christopher Groves & Max Munday & Natalia Yakovleva, 2013. "Fighting the Pipe: Neoliberal Governance and Barriers to Effective Community Participation in Energy Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 340-356, April.
    6. Sarbast Moslem & Muhammet Gul & Danish Farooq & Erkan Celik & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Rosyi Damayanti T. Manningtyas & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge versus Ecological Wisdom: Are They Dissimilar in Cultural Landscape Research?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Agata Kobyłka & Adam Gawryluk, 2021. "Social Responsibility of Economic Units and the Well-Being of Society in the Tourism Sector: Example of Accommodation Facility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Alessia D’Andrea & Patrizia Grifoni & Fernando Ferri, 2022. "Discussing the Role of ICT in Sustainable Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Wei Yu & Xiaofei Ye & Jun Chen & Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang, 2020. "Evaluation Indexes and Correlation Analysis of Origination–Destination Travel Time of Nanjing Metro Based on Complex Network Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Carmela Cucuzzella & Morteza Hazbei & Sherif Goubran, 2021. "Activating Data through Eco-Didactic Design in the Public Realm: Enabling Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    12. Tomasz Laskowicz, 2021. "The Perception of Polish Business Stakeholders of the Local Economic Impact of Maritime Spatial Planning Promoting the Development of Offshore Wind Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Convergence toward the 2030 Agenda’s Sustainability Development Goals: Evidence from Italian Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Xiaoxu Liang & Cristina Coscia & Elena Dellapiana & John Martin & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Complex Social Value-Based Approach for Decision-Making and Valorization Process in Chinese World Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Kulangsu (China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, April.
    17. Bassel El Hajj & Georgiana Karadas & Pouya Zargar, 2023. "How E-Government Can Help Societies during a Crisis: Implications of UTAUT Model in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Aurelija Armoškaitė & Ieva Bārda & Ingrīda Andersone & Ida Maria Bonnevie & Anda Ikauniece & Jonne Kotta & Anneliis Kõivupuu & Liisi Lees & Iwona Psuty & Solvita Strāķe & Sandra Sprukta & Lena Szymane, 2021. "Considerations of Use-Use Interactions between Macroalgae Cultivation and Other Maritime Sectors: An Eastern Baltic MSP Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Miriam von Thenen & Aurelija Armoškaitė & Víctor Cordero-Penín & Sara García-Morales & Josefine B. Gottschalk & Débora Gutierrez & Malena Ripken & Pascal Thoya & Kerstin S. Schiele, 2021. "The Future of Marine Spatial Planning—Perspectives from Early Career Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Yingyu Lu & Bo Cao & Yidi Hua & Lei Ding, 2020. "Efficiency Measurement of Green Regional Development and Its Influencing Factors: An Improved Data Envelopment Analysis Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11470-:d:913780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.