IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10826-d902237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Financing Efficiency and Entrepreneurial Vitality: Evidence from Chinese College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Xinming Ge

    (School of Management Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Jinbo Wang

    (School of Management Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

Entrepreneurial financing has a profound impact on young college students’ involvement in entrepreneurial practice and entrepreneurial performance. A certain amount of research literature about the relationship between financing efficiency and entrepreneurial vitality of college students has been accumulated, but the relevant analysis and research conclusions are not unified, which requires us to summarize general conclusions through the meta-analysis method. Based on 444,106 samples from 21 studies on the relationship between financing and entrepreneurship in college students from 2015 to 2022, this study conducts a meta-analysis on the relationship between their financial efficiency and entrepreneurial vitality. The moderating effects of five variables, entrepreneurial competence, entrepreneurial education level, age, entrepreneurial location environment and entrepreneur social capital are analyzed. The results of meta-analysis show that financing efficiency has a significant positive impact on the entrepreneurial vitality of college students. Entrepreneurial competence, entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial location environment have significant positive moderating effects on the relationship between financing efficiency and the entrepreneurial vitality of college students, Financing effectiveness and availability have significant positive effects on entrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial performance. On the basis of these conclusions, this study puts forward relevant suggestions from the perspective of government, universities and entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinming Ge & Jinbo Wang, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Financing Efficiency and Entrepreneurial Vitality: Evidence from Chinese College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10826-:d:902237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David B. Audretsch & Martin A. Carree & Adriaan J. Van Stel & A. Roy Thurik, 2002. "Impeded Industrial Restructuring: The Growth Penalty," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 81-98.
    2. Galindo, Miguel-Ángel & Méndez, María Teresa, 2014. "Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 825-829.
    3. Michael R. Betz & Mark D. Partridge & David S. Kraybill & Linda Lobao, 2012. "Why Do Localities Provide Economic Development Incentives? Geographic Competition, Political Constituencies, and Government Capacity," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 361-391, September.
    4. Chandler, Gaylen N. & Hanks, Steven H., 1994. "Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 331-349, July.
    5. Robichek, Alexander A. & Myers, Stewart C., 1966. "Problems in the Theory of Optimal Capital Structure," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-35, June.
    6. Eli Gimmon & Jonathan Levie, 2009. "Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 715-732.
    7. Albena Pergelova & Fernando Angulo-Ruiz, 2014. "The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9-10), pages 663-705, December.
    8. Mark Assibey‐Yeboah & Mohammed Mohsin, 2011. "Investment Tax Credit in an Open Economy with External Debt and Imperfect Capital Mobility," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 87(279), pages 629-642, December.
    9. Balaji S. Chakravarthy, 1986. "Measuring strategic performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(5), pages 437-458, September.
    10. Judith B. Kamm & Jeffrey C. Shuman & John A. Seeger & Aaron J. Nurick, 1990. "Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 14(4), pages 7-17, July.
    11. Edmund R. Thompson, 2009. "Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: Construct Clarification and Development of an Internationally Reliable Metric," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 669-694, May.
    12. Kai Du & Allan O’Connor, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and advancing national level economic efficiency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 91-111, January.
    13. Jennifer L. Woolley & Renee M. Rottner, 2008. "Innovation Policy and Nanotechnology Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(5), pages 791-811, September.
    14. Xiaohan Yan & Dongxiao Gu & Changyong Liang & Shuping Zhao & Wenxing Lu, 2018. "Fostering Sustainable Entrepreneurs: Evidence from China College Students’ “Internet Plus” Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition (CSIPC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Devi R. Gnyawali & Daniel S. Fogel, 1994. "Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 18(4), pages 43-62, July.
    16. Hogan, Teresa & Hutson, Elaine, 2005. "Capital structure in new technology-based firms: Evidence from the Irish software sector," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 369-387, February.
    17. Dean, Thomas J. & Meyer, G. Dale, 1996. "Industry environments and new venture formations in U.S. manufacturing: A conceptual and empirical analysis of demand determinants," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 107-132, March.
    18. Haifeng Qian & Kingsley Haynes, 2014. "Beyond innovation: the Small Business Innovation Research program as entrepreneurship policy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 524-543, August.
    19. Barbara Bird & Leon Schjoedt, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Behavior: Its Nature, Scope, Recent Research, and Agenda for Future Research," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Alan L. Carsrud & Malin Brännback (ed.), Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind, chapter 0, pages 327-358, Springer.
    20. James G. Combs & T. Russell Crook & Andreas Rauch, 2019. "Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deniz Ucbasaran & Paul Westhead & Mike Wright, 2001. "The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 57-80, July.
    2. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Thomas G. Johnson, 2016. "Entrepreneurship policy and economic growth: Solution or delusion? Evidence from a state initiative," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1033-1047, December.
    3. Bamford, CE & Dean, TJ & McDougall, PP, 2008. "Reconsidering the Niche Prescription for New Ventures: A Study of Initial Strategy and Growth," Discussion Paper Series 2008-04, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte.
    4. Castaño, María-Soledad & Méndez, María-Teresa & Galindo, Miguel-Ángel, 2015. "The effect of social, cultural, and economic factors on entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1496-1500.
    5. Ali, Abdul & Kelley, Donna J. & Levie, Jonathan, 2020. "Market-driven entrepreneurship and institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 117-128.
    6. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    7. Hong Joo Lee, 2019. "What Factors Are Necessary for Sustaining Entrepreneurship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Manuela Presutti & Cristina Boari & Antonio Majocchi, 2013. "Inter-organizational geographical proximity and local start-ups' knowledge acquisition: a contingency approach," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5-6), pages 446-467, June.
    9. Mario Rosique-Blasco & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2018. "The effects of personal abilities and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1025-1052, December.
    10. Castaño, María Soledad & Méndez, María Teresa & Galindo, Miguel Ángel, 2016. "The effect of public policies on entrepreneurial activity and economic growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5280-5285.
    11. Jennifer L. Woolley, 2014. "The Creation and Configuration of Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship in Emerging Domains of Activity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(4), pages 721-747, July.
    12. Carmen Lafuente & Ignacio López & Carlos Poza, 2014. "Education, Innovation, Stage of Activity and the Recent Economic Crisis as Key Factors of Internationalization: An Empirical Analysis of the Spanish Entrepreneurs Using the GEM Database," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(10), pages 54-67, October.
    13. Aki Kangasharju & Sari Pekkala, 2001. "The Role of Education in Self-Employment Success," Studies in Economics 0116, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    14. Ibrahim Al-Jubari, 2019. "College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention: Testing an Integrated Model of SDT and TPB," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    15. Carissa Tibia Walidayni & Dina Dellyana & Evy Rachmawati Chaldun, 2023. "Towards SDGs 4 and 8: How Value Co-Creation Affecting Entrepreneurship Education’s Quality and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Ingrid R. Epezagne Assamala & Wenyuan Li & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf & Nausheen Syed & He Di & Mehrab Nazir, 2022. "Mediation-Moderation Model: An Empirical Examination of Sustainable Women Entrepreneurial Performance towards Agricultural SMEs in Ivory Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Daniel A. Lerner & Richard A. Hunt & Ingrid Verheul, 2017. "Dueling Banjos: Harmony and Discord between ADHD and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 2017-07, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    18. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez & Lukasz Nazarko, 2019. "Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention among Young People: Model and Regional Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-29, December.
    19. Muhammad Anwar & Sher Zaman Khan & Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, 2018. "Big Data Capabilities and Firm’s Performance: A Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Per Davidsson & Johan Wiklund, 2001. "Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 81-100, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10826-:d:902237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.