IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9647-d881202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities for Ecosystem Services in the Protected Areas in the Coastal–Rural Area of the Nemunas Delta and the Curonian Lagoon (Lithuania)

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Marcinkevičiūtė

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Rasa Pranskūnienė

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Daiva Makutėnienė

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Ecosystems can provide a wide range of services that are critical to human well-being, health, subsistence, and survival. Examining the coherence between humans and ecosystems, ensuring the social and economic well-being of present and future generations in the context of ecosystem services (ES), this article seeks to present empirical research carried out on the possibilities of adapting human activities to ecosystem services in a specific area; namely, a coastal–rural area in the Lithuanian coastal zone, Nemunas Delta and Curonian Lagoon in Lithuania, seeking to offer opportunities with the rapidly declining population to operate services of ecosystems. Thus, elderships located near the Curonian Lagoon or within the protected area of the Nemunas Delta Regional Park were selected for the study. For this purpose, the empirical study involved representatives of different (public and private) sectors and stakeholders. The research was carried out in local tourism cultural centres and elderships with four group respondents (tourists, farmers, entrepreneurs, eldership employees). The research revealed that development of nature tourism could provide a lot of benefits for the region; after discovering the links between farming and nature tourism, possibilities would emerge to promote local farmers’ production by selling, not the raw materials, but already processed production, which has greater added value. The aforementioned tourist development ideas, especially in the ecologically vulnerable region, would enable the protected areas’ employees, local farmers, businesspeople, and municipal employees to seek new methods to adapt ecologically vulnerable areas for tourist needs without damaging the ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Marcinkevičiūtė & Rasa Pranskūnienė & Daiva Makutėnienė, 2022. "Opportunities for Ecosystem Services in the Protected Areas in the Coastal–Rural Area of the Nemunas Delta and the Curonian Lagoon (Lithuania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9647-:d:881202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Sandt, Anders & Low, Sarah A. & Thilmany, Dawn, 2018. "Exploring Regional Patterns of Agritourism in the U.S.: What's Driving Clusters of Enterprises?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 592-609, December.
    2. Tomas Doucha & Ivan Foltyn, 2006. "Modelling the Multifunctionality of Czech Agriculture," ENARPRI Working Papers 017, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    3. Jarmila Makovníková & Stanislav Kološta & Filip Flaška & Boris Pálka, 2022. "Regional Differentiations of the Potential of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Relation to Natural Capital—A Case Study in Selected Regions of the Slovak Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Gil Arroyo, Claudia & Barbieri, Carla & Rozier Rich, Samantha, 2013. "Defining agritourism: A comparative study of stakeholders' perceptions in Missouri and North Carolina," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Yuyu Wu & Jia Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Heterogeneity and Influencing Factors of Different Leisure Agriculture Types in the City," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Elbek Togaymurodov & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2023. "Opportunities and Directions of Development of Agritourism: Evidence from Samarkand Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    5. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2019. "Recreational Services Provision and Farm Diversification: A Technical Efficiency Analysis on Italian Agritourism," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Dubois, Charline & Cawley, Mary & Schmitz, Serge, 2017. "The tourist on the farm: A ‘muddled’ image," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 298-311.
    8. Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Hoffmann & Philipp Corradini, 2023. "The future of agritourism? A review of current trends of touristic commercialisation in rural areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 93-119, August.
    9. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2017. "When distinction does not pay off - Investigating the determinants of European agritourism prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-52.
    10. Emilio Chiodo & Héctor Luis Adriani & Fernando Pablo Navarro & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Collaborative Processes and Collective Impact in Tourist Rural Villages—Insights from a Comparative Analysis between Argentinian and Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Anders Van Sandt & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2022. "Navigating the corn maze: Customizing travel cost models to value market segments in heterogeneous industries," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(4), pages 899-919, June.
    12. M. Farzana Halim & Carla Barbieri & Duarte B. Morais & Susan Jakes & Erin Seekamp, 2020. "Beyond Economic Earnings: The Holistic Meaning of Success for Women in Agritourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Brune, Sara & Vilá, Olivia & Knollenberg, Whitney, 2023. "Family farms' resilience under the COVID-19 crisis: Challenges and opportunities with agritourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Mehdi Rezaei & Doohwan Kim & Ahad Alizadeh & Ladan Rokni, 2021. "Evaluating the Mental-Health Positive Impacts of Agritourism; A Case Study from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Deidre M. Peroff & Duarte B. Morais & Erin Sills, 2022. "The Role of Agritourism Microentrepreneurship and Collective Action in Shaping Stewardship of Farmlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Jing Li & Carla Barbieri, 2020. "Demystifying Members’ Social Capital and Networks within an Agritourism Association: A Social Network Analysis," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Nicola Livingstone & Nick Gallent & Iqbal Hamiduddin & Meri Juntti & Phoebe Stirling, 2021. "Beyond Agriculture: Alternative Geographies of Rural Land Investment and Place Effects across the United Kingdom," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Agnès Durrande-Moreau & François Courvoisier & Anne-Marie Bocquet, 2017. "The new integrated agritourism, a sustainable tourism trend [Le nouvel agritourisme intégré, une tendance du tourisme durable]," Post-Print hal-01555233, HAL.
    20. Michał Roman & Piotr Grudzień, 2021. "The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9647-:d:881202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.