IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6255-d820307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Improving the Quality of the Port’s Infrastructure on the Shippers’ Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Wagner

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, H. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Izabela Kotowska

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, H. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Michał Pluciński

    (Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Important attributes of a transportation chain are the costs of their operation, the security of supply they provide, and reducing carbon emissions throughout the chain. When making managerial decisions about the chain configuration, shippers consider the optimal choice of means of transport, carriers, or ports. Seaports, as transport nodes, determine the functioning of supply chains they serve. A constant process observed in the world shipping is the consistent increase in the average size of ships. Adapting the port and port access infrastructure to the changes observed in the world shipping is a prerequisite for maintaining the competitive position of the port, and consequently of the entire transport chain. Adequate hydrological conditions ensuring safe access to ports for increasingly larger ships are necessary for the stable functioning and development of a port and the entire region. For shippers, the certainty that the handling of larger vessels is assured regardless of any fluctuating hydro-meteorological conditions and temporary vessel entry permits is a guarantee of security of supply. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of fairway deepening on port-oriented supply chain costs and security of supply, as well as verification of the importance of these factors for cargo shippers’ decision-making. The article used the case study method based on the port of Szczecin, for which the investment of deepening the fairway to 12.5 m is being implemented. The article estimates the transport costs of five transport chains served by the port of Szczecin. Our research showed that a 2.5 m increase in the permissible draught of ships results in a decrease of up to 25% in transport costs resulting mainly from the reduction in specific fuel consumption throughout the chain. The analysis of the results showed that a secondary benefit of deepening the fairway can change the structure of the port’s foreland. This conclusion was validated by means of in-depth interviews held with selected shippers cooperating with the port of Szczecin. An additional outcome of the interviews was identification of the remaining conditions that should be met to take full advantage of improved port accessibility. The research is the first step to broader studies assessing whether improving quality of port infrastructure can contribute to a reduction in emissions from ships in a port and thus facilitate the transition to zero-emission ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Wagner & Izabela Kotowska & Michał Pluciński, 2022. "The Impact of Improving the Quality of the Port’s Infrastructure on the Shippers’ Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6255-:d:820307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    2. Sang-Yoon Lee & Hyunwoo Lim & Hwa-Joong Kim, 2017. "Forecasting container port volume: implications for dredging," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 296-314, June.
    3. C. Izaguirre & I. J. Losada & P. Camus & J. L. Vigh & V. Stenek, 2021. "Climate change risk to global port operations," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 14-20, January.
    4. Marcella De Martino & Alfonso Morvillo, 2008. "Activities, resources and inter-organizational relationships: key factors in port competitiveness," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 571-589, December.
    5. Jiannan, Cheng & feng, Lian & Zhongzhen, Yang, 2020. "Impacts of the choice habits of port users on the effects and efficiencies of port investment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 203-214.
    6. Mateusz Piwowarski & Uma Shankar Singh & Kesra Nermend, 2020. "Application of EEG Metrics in the Decision-Making Process," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Kesra Nermend & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska (ed.), Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics, chapter 0, pages 187-199, Springer.
    7. Marzieh Nazemzadeh & Thierry Vanelslander, 2015. "The container transport system: Selection criteria and business attractiveness for North-European ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 17(2), pages 221-245, June.
    8. Yang, Yi-Chih & Ge, Ying-En, 2020. "Adaptation strategies for port infrastructure and facilities under climate change at the Kaohsiung port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 232-244.
    9. Tongzon, Jose & Heng, Wu, 2005. "Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 405-424, June.
    10. Mateus Magala & Adrian Sammons, 2008. "A New Approach to Port Choice Modelling," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 9-34, March.
    11. Mittal, Neha & McClung, Dale, 2016. "Shippers’ Changing Priorities in Port Selection Decision - A Survey Analysis Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 55(3), December.
    12. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Feo-Valero, María, 2022. "Do shippers’ characteristics influence port choice criteria? Capturing heterogeneity by using latent class models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 96-105.
    13. Francesco Parola & Marcello Risitano & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 2017. "The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 116-138, January.
    14. Xia, Wenyi & Lindsey, Robin, 2021. "Port adaptation to climate change and capacity investments under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 180-204.
    15. Yeo, Gi-Tae & Roe, Michael & Dinwoodie, John, 2008. "Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 910-921, July.
    16. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Joanna Kizielewicz & Katarzyna Skrzeszewska, 2021. "Identifying Actions to Prepare Electricity Infrastructure in Seaports for Future Power Supplying Cruise Ships with Energy from Land," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Acciaro, Michele & Ghiara, Hilda & Cusano, Maria Inés, 2014. "Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 4-12.
    19. Kevin Cullinane & Yahui Teng & Teng-Fei Wang, 2005. "Port competition between Shanghai and Ningbo," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 331-346, October.
    20. Ferrari, C. & Parola, F. & Gattorna, E., 2011. "Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 382-391, March.
    21. Song, Lili & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2014. "Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 173-183.
    22. Kashiha, Mona & Thill, Jean-Claude & Depken, Craig A., 2016. "Shipping route choice across geographies: Coastal vs. landlocked countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-14.
    23. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & de Sa Porto, Paulo Costacurta & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2018. "Port infrastructures and trade: Empirical evidence from Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 126-139.
    24. Mary R. Brooks & Thanos Pallis & Stephen Perkins, 2014. "Port Investment and Container Shipping Markets: Roundtable Summary and Conclusions," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/3, OECD Publishing.
    25. Lorena Garcia-Alonso & Jason Monios & José Ángel Vallejo-Pinto, 2019. "Port competition through hinterland accessibility: the case of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(2), pages 258-277, June.
    26. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    27. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    28. Yulai Wan & Anming Zhang & Kevin X Li, 2018. "Port competition with accessibility and congestion: a theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 239-259, February.
    29. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    30. Tongzon, Jose L., 2009. "Port choice and freight forwarders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 186-195, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Feo-Valero, María, 2022. "Do shippers’ characteristics influence port choice criteria? Capturing heterogeneity by using latent class models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 96-105.
    2. Feo-Valero, María & Martínez-Moya, Julián, 2022. "Shippers vs. freight forwarders: Do they differ in their port choice decisions? Evidence from the Spanish ceramic tile industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Guerrero, David & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2021. "Challenging the shipper's location problem in port studies: An analysis of French AOC wine shipments to the US," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena & del Rosal, Ignacio, 2018. "Influence of the geographical pattern of foreign trade on the inland distribution of maritime traffic," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 191-200.
    5. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Chen, Zhangliang & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2019. "Spatial interaction effects on inland distribution of maritime flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena & Salas-Olmedo, María Henar, 2017. "Delimiting the scope of the hinterland of ports: Proposal and case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 35-43.
    8. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    9. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    10. Kaliszewski, Adam & Kozłowski, Arkadiusz & Dąbrowski, Janusz & Klimek, Hanna, 2021. "LinkedIn survey reveals competitiveness factors of container terminals: Forwarders’ view," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 131-140.
    11. Javier Cantillo & Víctor Cantillo-García & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2023. "Port choice using aggregate open data: an application to Colombian port zones," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 520-548, September.
    12. Kammoun, Rabeb & Abdennadher, Chokri, 2022. "Seaport efficiency and competitiveness in European seaports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-124.
    13. Qu, Chenrui & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin X. & Lin, Kun-Chin, 2020. "Modeling incentive strategies for landside integration in multimodal transport chains," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 47-64.
    14. Castelein, R.B. & Geerlings, H. & van Duin, J.H.R., 2019. "Divergent effects of container port choice incentives on users' behavior," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 82-93.
    15. Peng, Peng & Yang, Yu & Lu, Feng & Cheng, Shifen & Mou, Naixia & Yang, Ren, 2018. "Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 852-867.
    16. Deng, Ping & Song, Lian & Xiao, Ruiqi & Huang, Chengfeng, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 249-267.
    17. Martínez-Pardo, Ana & Orro, Alfonso & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2020. "Analysis of port choice: A methodological proposal adjusted with public data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-193.
    18. Li, Shengchao & Cao, Xiaoshu & Liao, Wang & He, Yongquan, 2020. "Factors in the sea ports-of-entry and road ports-of-entry cross-border logistics route choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Steven, Adams B. & Corsi, Thomas M., 2012. "Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 881-895.
    20. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6255-:d:820307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.