IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6233-d819988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Approach to the Stakeholder Mapping of Energy Lab in Poor Urban Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Xue-Qing Chen

    (School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, 7535 Bellville, South Africa)

  • Josephine K. Musango

    (School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, 7535 Bellville, South Africa)

Abstract

Various efforts are presently being undertaken to set up and maintain open, inclusive, participatory, and transparent processes, whilst at the same time, strengthening stakeholder partnerships in implementing SDGs remains a challenge. This paper enriched the discussion of multi-stakeholder approaches through a dynamic multi-level system view of stakeholder mapping, along with important theoretical frameworks and key empirical results to tackle the lack of security of energy services in poor urban settings. The study attempted to develop comprehensive cases for Africa-based experiences of the pilot project launched through a set-up of an energy living lab in the Groenheuwel community, as well as achieve an improved understanding of social-technical benefits of gendered energy security and innovative solutions at the household level. The contents are two-fold. The first part assesses the theoretical models available for stakeholders and outcome mapping. The second part focuses on the preliminary identification of stakeholders and their primary interests at all levels. The results of this study found that the energy living lab in poor urban settings recognised the importance of stakeholder mapping and the development of new solutions. Findings indicated that all stakeholders should support the government in the development of policies and strategies. Findings also suggested that key players should proactively agree and negotiate with the local government on energy outcome measures. It was also found that multi-stakeholder involvement improved transparency and accountability for decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue-Qing Chen & Josephine K. Musango, 2022. "A Conceptual Approach to the Stakeholder Mapping of Energy Lab in Poor Urban Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6233-:d:819988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kovacic, Zora & Giampietro, Mario, 2017. "Between theory and quantification: An integrated analysis of metabolic patterns of informal urban settlements," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 377-386.
    2. Eva van Genuchten & Alicia Calderón González & Ingrid Mulder, 2019. "Open Innovation Strategies for Sustainable Urban Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Rodríguez-Huerta, Edgar & Rosas-Casals, Martí & Sorman, Alevgul H., 2017. "A societal metabolism approach to job creation and renewable energy transitions in Catalonia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 551-564.
    3. Diaz-Maurin, François & Chiguvare, Zivayi & Gope, Gideon, 2018. "Scarcity in abundance: The challenges of promoting energy access in the Southern African region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 110-120.
    4. Viput Ongsakul & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Low Carbon Energy Symbiosis for Sustainability: Review of Shared Value-based Policy Metabolism to Enhance the Implementability of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 24-30.
    5. Ariadna Reyes, 2021. "Revealing the Contribution of Informal Settlements to Climate Change Mitigation in Latin America: A Case Study of Isidro Fabela, Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Chiara Marradi & Ingrid Mulder, 2022. "Scaling Local Bottom-Up Innovations through Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Gianluca Elia & Alessandro Margherita & Claudio Petti, 2020. "Building responses to sustainable development challenges: A multistakeholder collaboration framework and application to climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2465-2478, September.
    8. Kovacic, Zora & Musango, Josephine Kaviti & Ambole, Lorraine Amollo & Buyana, Kareem & Smit, Suzanne & Anditi, Christer & Mwau, Baraka & Ogot, Madara & Lwasa, Shuaib & Brent, Alan C. & Nsangi, Gloria , 2019. "Interrogating differences: A comparative analysis of Africa’s informal settlements," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 614-627.
    9. Han, Wenyi & Geng, Yong & Lu, Yangsiyu & Wilson, Jeffrey & Sun, Lu & Satoshi, Onishi & Geldron, Alain & Qian, Yiying, 2018. "Urban metabolism of megacities: A comparative analysis of Shanghai, Tokyo, London and Paris to inform low carbon and sustainable development pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 887-898.
    10. Kang Pan & Feng He & Rong Liu, 2022. "Does High-Tech Industry Agglomeration Promote Its Export Product Upgrading?—Based on the Perspective of Innovation and Openness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6233-:d:819988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.