IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5947-d815175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Kwangheon Park

    (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Seunghyun Son

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Jinhyuk Oh

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Sunkuk Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

Abstract

The decommissioning of nuclear power plants (NPPs) is rapidly increasing because NPPs are not only no longer profitable in many cases but are also being decommissioned due to a lack of public acceptance or political reasons in many countries, particularly in Europe, following the explosion of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP. Accordingly, a significant body of research has focused on achieving safe, environmentally sound, and sustainable decommissioning in many countries where there is demand for NPP decommissioning. In order to achieve sustainable decommissioning that restores the NPP site to its pre-NPP environmental state, it is necessary to understand the safety, technology, and cost aspects as well as having the process and strategy to systematically promote them. Although there are a limited number of countries with experience and knowledge in the management of decommissioning multiple NPPs, researchers in countries just starting NPP decommissioning need diverse research information on how to formulate a sustainable decommissioning strategy as well as related factors. In particular, a systematic review of decommissioning strategies, such as DD, ID, and ET, and the influencing factors associated with each strategy is needed from the researcher’s point of view. In this regard, this study reviews the research literature on decommissioning strategies for nuclear power plants with a sustainable perspective. A systematic method involving a meta-analysis is used. The results of this study confirm that many researchers are most interested in DD and are dealing with ID and ET at the same level, but in reality, DD and ID are being adopted at similar rates. Thus far, only three ETs have been adopted in the United States. Most countries that have adopted ID are deemed to have been influenced by political decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwangheon Park & Seunghyun Son & Jinhyuk Oh & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5947-:d:815175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volk, Rebekka & Hübner, Felix & Hünlich, Tobias & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "The future of nuclear decommissioning – A worldwide market potential study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 226-261.
    2. Li, Fei & Wang, Jing & Li, Hui & Hu, Qian & Dan, Wenxuan & Ge, Liangquan & Cohen, David, 2021. "Evaluation on nuclear emergency response strategies in the Asia-Pacific region," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    3. Lough, W. Timothy & White, K. Preston, 1990. "A critical review of nuclear power plant decommissioning planning studies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 471-479, June.
    4. Hoti, Ferdiana & Perko, Tanja & Thijssen, Peter & Renn, Ortwin, 2021. "Who is willing to participate? Examining public participation intention concerning decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. repec:kap:iaecre:v:11:y:2005:i:4:p:449-458 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Richard Schroeder & Suzanne Sevin & Kathryn Yarbrough, 2005. "Reporting Effects of SFAS 143 on Nuclear Decommissioning Costs," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 11(4), pages 449-458, November.
    7. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Sloan, Robert D. & Rosner, Robert, 2021. "Decommissioning the U.S. nuclear fleet: Financial assurance, corporate structures, and bankruptcy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Alex W. J. Cheng & Harry F. Lee, 2022. "Energy Transition towards Sustainable Development: Perspective of Individuals’ Engagement Amid Transition Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Bärenbold, Rebekka & Weigt, Hannes & Rosner, Robert, 2023. "An ex-ante method to verify commercial U.S. nuclear power plant decommissioning cost estimates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    4. Ji Su Kang & Jae Hak Cheong, 2020. "Characteristics of Radioactive Effluent Releases from Pressurized Water Reactors after Permanent Shutdown," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Seyed Hadi Ghazaie & Khashayar Sadeghi & Ekaterina Sokolova & Evgeniy Fedorovich & Amirsaeed Shirani, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Desalination Technologies Powered by SMR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Felix Hübner & Patrick Gerhards & Christian Stürck & Rebekka Volk, 2021. "Solving the nuclear dismantling project scheduling problem by combining mixed-integer and constraint programming techniques and metaheuristics," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 269-290, June.
    7. Mackie, Colin & Velenturf, Anne P.M., 2021. "Trouble on the horizon: Securing the decommissioning of offshore renewable energy installations in UK waters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Koomey, Jonathan & Hultman, Nathan E., 2007. "A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970-2005," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5630-5642, November.
    9. Scherwath, Tim & Wealer, Ben & Mendelevitch, Roman, 2020. "Nuclear decommissioning after the German Nuclear Phase-Out an integrated view on new regulations and nuclear logistics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5947-:d:815175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.