IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5824-d813253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Yujia Huo

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jiali Wang

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Xiangyu Guo

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yang Xu

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Problems such as the reduction of the added value of agricultural products and the interruption of the supply of agricultural products caused by the unstable collaborative relationship have seriously hindered the high-quality development of the agricultural product supply chain. Promoting the stable collaboration in the agricultural product supply chain is an urgent problem. Considering the characteristic demand of consumers for agricultural products, this paper takes the supply chain mainly operating characteristic agricultural products and dominated by farmer cooperatives as the research object and constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model of farmer cooperatives, manufacturers, and retailers. We study the supply chain collaboration mechanism from the main strategy choice and the specific factors affecting its strategy choice. The results show that farmer cooperatives implement a strict supervision strategy and increase the reward and punishment to promote the collaboration in the supply chain, but the increase in supervision cost is not conducive to the income of farmer cooperatives. In the case of loose supervision, the difference between the additional income and the collaboration input is higher than the “free-rider” income obtained when adopting a non-collaboration strategy, which is conducive to its evolution towards collaboration. In addition, increasing additional income, improving synergy coefficient, and reducing collaboration input and “free-rider” income will increase the probability of the system evolving to Pareto optimal, and accelerate the realization of comprehensive collaboration in the agricultural product supply chain dominated by farmer cooperatives. The research results provide a certain supplement to the related research on agricultural product supply chains in theory, and provide a reference for the comprehensive collaboration of the agricultural product supply chain dominated by farmer cooperatives in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujia Huo & Jiali Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5824-:d:813253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Shin & Sun Hyun Park & Sangwook Park, 2019. "Partnership-Based Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Commitment, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Ding, Huiping & Zhao, Qilan & An, Zhirong & Tang, Ou, 2016. "Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 191-207.
    3. Fynes, Brian & Voss, Chris & de Burca, Sean, 2005. "The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 339-354, June.
    4. Chanchan Hao & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang & Long Shao & Yunqing Yan, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Knowledge-Sharing Behavior in the Construction Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Dongjie Shen & K.K. Lai & Stephen Leung & Liang Liang, 2011. "Modelling and analysis of inventory replenishment for perishable agricultural products with buyer–seller collaboration," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1207-1217.
    6. Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez & Cynthia Giagnocavo, 2021. "Management Strategies and Collaborative Relationships for Sustainability in the Agrifood Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Wang, Lu & Luo, Jianli, 2019. "Vegetable supply chain integration: the case of a trinity cooperative in China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 22(5), June.
    8. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    9. Hui Zhang & Xin Su, 2021. "The Applications and Complexity Analysis Based on Supply Chain Enterprises’ Green Behaviors under Evolutionary Game Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    11. Rodrigo Lozano, 2007. "Collaboration as a pathway for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 370-381.
    12. Margherita Pero & Antonella Moretto & Eleonora Bottani & Barbara Bigliardi, 2017. "Environmental Collaboration for Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Exploratory Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Jue-Ping Xie & Huai-Ying Lei & Shaojian Qu, 2021. "Simulation Study on the Evolutionary Game Mechanism of Collaborative Innovation in Supply Chain Enterprises and Its Influencing Elements," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, December.
    14. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M.C. Fritz & Rupert Baumgartner, 2016. "Toward supply chain-wide sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework and an aggregation method to assess supply chain performance," Post-Print hal-02547245, HAL.
    15. Serra, Teresa & Poli, Elena, 2015. "Shadow prices of social capital in rural India, a nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 892-903.
    16. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhou, Mingmei, 2019. "Firms’ green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 118-134.
    17. Amit Arora & Anshu Arora & Julius Anyu & John R. McIntyre, 2021. "Global Value Chains’ Disaggregation through Supply Chain Collaboration, Market Turbulence, and Performance Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Laia Fayet & Walter J.V. Vermeulen, 2014. "Supporting Smallholders to Access Sustainable Supply Chains: Lessons from the Indian Cotton Supply Chain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 289-310, September.
    19. Maryam Esmaeili & Ghazaleh Allameh & Taraneh Tajvidi, 2016. "Using game theory for analysing pricing models in closed-loop supply chain from short- and long-term perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2152-2169, April.
    20. Sambasivan, Murali & Siew-Phaik, Loke & Abidin Mohamed, Zainal & Choy Leong, Yee, 2013. "Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: Role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 339-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shizhen Bai & Wenzhen Yu & Man Jiang, 2022. "Promoting the Tripartite Cooperative Mechanism of E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation: Based on the Evolutionary Game Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Jiali Wang & Yujia Huo & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Pricing Strategy of the Agricultural Product Supply Chain with Farmer Cooperatives as the Core Enterprise," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Feixiao Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Quality of Agricultural Products in Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Zhicheng Weng & Pinliang Luo, 2021. "Supervision of the Default Risk of Online Car-Hailing Platform from an Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Jichao Geng & Meiyu Ji & Li Yang, 2022. "Role of Enterprise Alliance in Carbon Emission Reduction Mechanism: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Fidel Torres & César García-Díaz, 2018. "Evolutionary dynamics of two-actor VMI-driven supply chains," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 351-377, September.
    6. Jiabao Jing & Xiaomei Deng & Rashid Maqbool & Yahya Rashid & Saleha Ashfaq, 2020. "Default Behaviors of Contractors under Surety Bond in Construction Industry Based on Evolutionary Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Yusheng Chen & Zhaofa Sun & Yanmei Wang & Ye Ma & Weili Yang, 2024. "Seeds of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Theoretical Framework Illustrated by the Breeding of Salt-Tolerant Rice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Chauhan, Chetna & Kaur, Puneet & Arrawatia, Rakesh & Ractham, Peter & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Teamwork makes achieving SDGs dream work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 290-307.
    9. Terence Fell & Johanna Mattsson, 2021. "The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Housing as a Potential Contributor to Sustainable Cities and Communities: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Rebeca B. Sánchez-Flores & Samantha E. Cruz-Sotelo & Sara Ojeda-Benitez & Ma. Elizabeth Ramírez-Barreto, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Massimiliano Ferrara & Cinzia Raso & Antonio Violi, 2021. "Collaborative Organization Models for Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Johan Larsson & Lisa Larsson, 2020. "Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Gu, Wei & Wei, Lirong & Zhang, Wenqing & Yan, Xiangbin, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis of cooperation between natural resource- and energy-intensive companies in reverse logistics operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 159-169.
    14. Chuan Zhao & Luyao Li & Hongxia Sun & Hongji Yang, 2021. "Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game of Rumor-Affected Enterprises under Demand Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Santanu Mandal, 2016. "Towards An Integrated Logistics Capabilities Model Of Supply Chain Flexibility: A Social Exchange Perspective," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(3), pages 44-67, September.
    16. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie & Qunli Zhai, 2022. "Management Policy of Farmers’ Cultivated Land Abandonment Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    19. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    20. Wang Mingbao & Du Zhiping & Duan Hong, 2017. "Study on Participant Behavior Game of Electronic Products Reverse Supply Chain Based on ECP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(5), pages 411-434, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5824-:d:813253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.