IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p4025-d530268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Blockchain-Enabled Solutions as SDG Accelerators in the International Development Space

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Faruk Aysan

    (College of Islamic Studies, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar)

  • Fouad Bergigui

    (SDI Global Consult, Dover, DE 19901, USA)

  • Mustafa Disli

    (College of Islamic Studies, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar)

Abstract

As the world is striving to recover from the shockwaves triggered by the COVID-19 crisis, all hands are needed on deck to transition towards green recovery and make peace with nature as prerequisites of a global sustainable development pathway. In this paper, we examine the blockchain hype, the gaps in the knowledge, and the tools needed to build promising use cases for blockchain technology to accelerate global efforts in this decade of action towards achieving the SDGs. We attempt to break the “hype cycle” portraying blockchain’s superiority by navigating a rational blockchain use case development approach. By prototyping an SDG Acceleration Scorecard to use blockchain-enabled solutions as SDG accelerators, we aim to provide useful insights towards developing an integrated approach that is fit-for-purpose to guide organizations and practitioners in their quest to make informed decisions to design and implement blockchain-backed solutions as SDG accelerators. Acknowledging the limitations in prototyping such tools, we believe these are minimally viable products and should be considered as living tools that can further evolve as the blockchain technology matures, its pace of adoption increases, lessons are learned, and good practices and standards are widely shared and internalized by teams and organizations working on innovation for development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Fouad Bergigui & Mustafa Disli, 2021. "Using Blockchain-Enabled Solutions as SDG Accelerators in the International Development Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:4025-:d:530268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/4025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/4025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Abrahamson & Lori Rosenkopf, 1997. "Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 289-309, June.
    2. Christian Catalini & Joshua S. Gans, 2016. "Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain," NBER Working Papers 22952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Zhu, Shuai & Song, Malin & Lim, Ming Kim & Wang, Jianlin & Zhao, Jiajia, 2020. "The development of energy blockchain and its implications for China's energy sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Luis Carlos Castillo-Téllez & Dilek Demirbas & Mustafa Disli, 2021. "Foreign Trade, Education, And Innovative Performance: A Multilevel Analysis," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 24(3), pages 413-440, September.
    2. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Unal, Ibrahim Musa, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Fintech and Blockchain in Islamic Finance," MPRA Paper 109712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Btool H. Mohamed & Mustafa Disli & Mohammed bin Saleh Al-Sada & Muammer Koç, 2022. "Investigation on Human Development Needs, Challenges, and Drivers for Transition to Sustainable Development: The Case of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Bryane Michael & Nataliya Koroleska & Andy Tai & David Wai Ho Wong, 2022. "A critical look at using financial technology policy to promote the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1911-1920, December.
    5. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Bergigui, Fouad, 2021. "Sustainability, Trust and Blockchain Applications: Best Practices and Fintech Prospects," MPRA Paper 110023, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Disli, Mustafa & Nagayev, Ruslan & Salim, Kinan & Rizkiah, Siti K. & Aysan, Ahmet F., 2021. "In search of safe haven assets during COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical analysis of different investor types," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Ali Yavuz Polat & Hasan Tekin & Ahmet Semih Tunali, 2021. "Bitcoin-specific fear sentiment and bitcoin returns in the COVID-19 outbreak," Working Papers hal-03354930, HAL.
    8. Tamy Al-Binali & Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Hasan Dinçer & Ibrahim Musa Unal & Serhat Yüksel, 2023. "New Horizons in Bank Mergers: A Quantum Spherical Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Analyzing Islamic and Conventional Bank Mergers and Enhancing Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-37, May.
    9. Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Ibrahim Musa Unal, 2021. "Is Islamic Finance Evolving Into Fintech and Blockchain: A Bibliometric Analysis," Post-Print hal-03351153, HAL.
    10. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Aleksandar Šević & Milena P. Ilić & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Nevenka Popović Šević & Larisa Mihoreanu, 2021. "Untapped Aspects of Innovation and Competition within a European Resilient Circular Economy. A Dual Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiang (John) Lin & James A. Kitts & Haibin Yang & J. Richard Harrison, 2008. "Elucidating strategic network dynamics through computational modeling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 175-208, September.
    2. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Cappetta, Rossella & Cillo, Paola & Ponti, Anna, 2006. "Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1273-1290, November.
    4. Wang Guizhou & Zhang Si & Yu Tao & Ning Yu, 2021. "A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 205-238, June.
    5. Christoph Safferling & Aaron Lowen, 2011. "Economics in the Kingdom of Loathing: Analysis of Virtual Market Data," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2011-30, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    6. Cai, Yuzhuo, 2023. "Towards a new model of EU-China innovation cooperation: Bridging missing links between international university collaboration and international industry collaboration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Anil Donmez & Alexander Karaivanov, 2022. "Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 265-292, January.
    8. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    9. Xue, Chaokai & Jiang, Ping & Dang, Xinghua, 2019. "The dynamics of network communities and venture capital performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 6-10.
    10. Wang, Qiyu & Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, 2021. "Factor pricing of cryptocurrencies," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Xiong, Hang & Payne, Diane & Kinsella, Stephen, 2016. "Peer effects in the diffusion of innovations: Theory and simulation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-13.
    12. Heejung Byun & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Identity Claims and Diffusion of Sustainability Report: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies, 2003–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 551-565, February.
    13. Ajoy Ketan Sarangi & Rudra Prakash Pradhan, 2020. "ICT infrastructure and economic growth: a critical assessment and some policy implications," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 363-383, December.
    14. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Hinz, Oliver & Schulze, Christian & Takac, Carsten, 2014. "New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2836-2844.
    16. Darcy W E Allen & Alastair Berg & Chris Berg & Brendan Markey-Towler & Jason Potts, 2019. "Some economic consequences of the GDPR," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 785-797.
    17. Huberman, Gur & Leshno, Jacob D. & Moallemi, Ciamac, 2017. "Monopoly without a monopolist: An economic analysis of the bitcoin payment system," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 27/2017, Bank of Finland.
    18. Martin Cimiterra & Jackie Krafft & Lionel Nesta, 2021. "Blockchain as Schumpeter Mark 1 or Mark 2? An empirical analysis of blockchain job offers in France and Germany [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1388-1402.
    19. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    20. Christoph H. Loch & Bernardo A. Huberman, 1999. "A Punctuated-Equilibrium Model of Technology Diffusion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 160-177, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:4025-:d:530268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.